User talk:Caltas/Archive01

Vandalism
On 2nd of July at 15:39 you said that the IP address 84.70.133.184 vandalised the Talk:Mars page two times. Was that 15:39 US time or 15:39 UK time? Because at 15:39 UK time on that day I myself was using the internet and I did not make those edits. If it was 15:39 US time then that would be 8:39 UK time... when one of my brothers could have done it, although it is unlikely, as this is a shared IP address. This is just so I can have peace of mind and know who did it. I myself have my own account and don't use the anonymous 84.70.133.184 account but I would just like to make sure no-one was hacking into my internet connection.

Another weird thing: on my Internet Options it says my IP address is 192.168.1.114, yet on Wikipedia it says it is 84.70.133.184. I don't know why that is. Does that mean that Wikipedia has confused my IP address? Or that it has changed?

Thanks from 84.70.133.184.


 * 192.168.*.* are reserved IP addresses. These addresses are only used on local subnets, so what you're seeing is an intermediate IP address. Your "real" IP address is (at least occasionally) 84.70.133.184. You can find more about this by reading Wikipedia's article on Private networks. Ben Hocking (talk 13:31, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Also, the time stamps appear to correspond to US Central Time. (One hour behind US Eastern Time, and I believe 6 hours behind UK Time.) Ben Hocking (talk 13:37, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

So 6 hours behind UK time would mean 9:39pm... I don't think anyone was using the computer at 9:39pm. "i am gay and you have just made a big mistake letting me edit wikepedia " and "i will just keep on changing it so do as i say and there shall be no 'unsatifactory images' online"... NO-ONE in my family would say things like that... trust me. Puzzling. From 84.70.133.184.


 * How are you connected to the internet? It's possible that there's one "entity" that's connected (84.70.133.184) and that this entity then "serves up" the internet to nodes on its local net (giving you a local IP of 192.168.1.114). In that case, everyone on this "local net" would have the same IP address as far as everyone else on the internet is concerned. This would only be feasible, however, on a relatively small local network (less than 256 users, I believe). Of course, a cheap ISP could (I imagine) have a variety of such entries and thus "multiply" the number of users it can "support". If this is an ISP, it sounds like it might be kinda lame. :) Ben Hocking (talk 15:16, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for the advice, I have no idea how the internet is connected (as it is a family computer and my dad does all the tech-stuff)but I deeply hope yoou're right. I swear that no-one using my computer would make those edits and I don't want my computer to be banned from editing!!! From 84.70.133.184.

Reply to the "Vandalism" accusation in "Minsk"
Caltas, you cannot accuse people of "appears to be vandalism" just because you think it is. You offended me very much. I am, personaly, sick and tired of everyone spreading lies and politicized slander about the Country (and the particular city, in this case). However much I appreciate your good-faith attempts to keep this website professional (I wish there were more people like you), I think, one needs to be a little more cautious with throwing accusations left and right. In my case, I do KNOW what I am talking about for I was born in the country (even though left it many years ago and have only vague recallections of it) and studied its hystory for 4 years at school; and, to be honest, I'm sick and tired of seeing anybody who wants changing it back and forth at will. In this particualar case, you THINK that what You know is the ultimate truth, yet it is not so. My studies are (were) based on the actual historical documents and confirmed information. So, in a way, it is an imposition of YOUR will (AND authority to block those who disagree) on others by labeling them "appears to be vandalism" just because You decided that the original version is true and not the updated. And that is totally UN-democratic. (By the way, where can I see the actual strings that had been changed? You did mention that the address can be shared and that anybody can use it. - It is true though, this connection is "very much public", if I may say so.) Once again, I thank You for your effort to keep this place professional and free from skunks of different sorts. It is a noble cause to persue. However, this string:"...editing of this sort might be considered as vandalism by some people and we/I am not happy to receive their emails..." or something like this, would probably be much softer to let a person know that something is a little of keel here or there. Thank You very much again. Regards.

P.S. I am copy-pasting this message to a document on my machine. In case if it is some sort of sabotage due to the connection being public I will re-post it again or find another way of contacting you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.82.217.154 (talk • contribs)


 * Sorry for responding so late (I had no internet the last weeks), and sorry for reverting your edits. I reverted you because of this edit, which looked like vandalism to me. Vandals often insert capital letters in articles, so I did not look at your other edits... (If you revert someone, all edits of this user made in a row are reverted) --Caltas (talk) 21:35, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
 * PS: to see the changes of a page you have to click on the tab "history" next to "edit this page" on the top of an article.

Alevi
Hi, I merged to sections of the article which were both about history, I assumed it would be better to delete the old article rather than duplicate it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.100.50.190 (talk • contribs) Caltas(talk) 21:04, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Sorry, my mistake, you are right, I didn't see the two history sections and thought it was vandalism... --Caltas(talk) 21:04, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

Confused
Thanks for drawing my attention to the recent vandalism performed on this IP address. i dont no how it happened. i didnt do it and my brother swears blind it was not him. Is there any other explanation for this to happen? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.67.207.4 (talk • contribs) Caltas(talk) 16:08, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
 * The edits were made nearly ten days ago, and IP adresses change periodically. This means that another person could have done the vandalism. So just ignore the warnings or consider creating an account to avoid confusions. --Caltas(talk) 16:08, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

Apology
Thank you for your hard work in reverting vandalism. I minute ago I accidentally blocked you instead of the account whose vandalism you had reverted. I unblocked you immediately but I cannot apologise enough for my mistake. WjBscribe 19:46, 16 April 2007 (UTC)

no problem ;-)--Caltas 19:48, 16 April 2007 (UTC)

Thanks …
… for reverting on my user page. —DerHexer (Talk) 17:15, 17 April 2007 (UTC)


 * you're welcome --Caltas 17:17, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Same goes for me. You're a hero. :) J Milburn 21:00, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
 * You must be the user page king, thanks for reverting on mine. Inter16 14:27, 19 April 2007 (UTC)

Martin and Osa Johnson
Why did you revert my edit? If you read my piece in the talk page, you will see why this has no place in their article. 86.133.245.23
 * Sorry, I didn't read the talk page--Caltas 15:26, 19 April 2007 (UTC)

Reverting of vandalism
Hello, what do you use exactly to revert vandalism? It seems the same time you revert it, it posts a warning message. I would be keen to know how you do it.. Many thanks, Extranet (Talk 21:44, 21 April 2007 (UTC)

I use WP:VF to watch the recent changes in combination with WP:TW. Greetings --Caltas 21:48, 21 April 2007 (UTC)

Thanks
...for reverting my user page :-) Stephenb (Talk) 16:34, 23 April 2007 (UTC)

Thanks from me, too. =) -- Gogo Dodo 16:34, 23 April 2007 (UTC)


 * no problem ;-) --Caltas 16:35, 23 April 2007 (UTC)


 * Thanks again. =) -- Gogo Dodo 20:23, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

And to be completely original, thanks from me too. :) Garion96 (talk) 19:05, 23 April 2007 (UTC)

Hey, me too. (It's interesting that a spammer in London I reverted and warned recently has a friend in the US state of Arkansas to delete his warnings and do some other dirty work for him.) --CliffC 19:31, 26 April 2007 (UTC)

Reverting vandalism on Antonio_Vivaldi
Hi there. If I can offer some advice, I noticed you were reverting vandal edits on Antonio_Vivaldi by rolling back one version. Usually this is OK, but if the page is being heavily attacked as it was tonight it's not enough, because sometimes there are 2 or 3 vandal edits in a row - if you look at the page history for tonight you'll see what I mean.

I use WP:POP to get a quick view of the edit without having to click on each one, and I have "expand watchlist" set in my preferences, so if the article is on my watchlist I can see how much has been added and deleted by each recent edit. Anyway, it's nice to see someone else fighting them. Greetings --Stephen Burnett 20:10, 23 April 2007 (UTC)

Thanks
Caltas, Thank you for catching the vandalism to my userpage and so quickly reverting it. Your vigilance is greatly appreciated. -- Pastordavid 20:11, 23 April 2007 (UTC)

Reverts
Thanks for you reverts and bans on my userpage spam!~ Giggy!  Please leave your comments on my talk page, not yours. 00:21, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

User page vandalism
Thanks for catching some vandalism to my user page earlier on! Much appreciated. --Samtheboy (t/c) 18:52, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

My Userpage
Thanks for undoing the vandalism on my userpage. I did not even notice it until just now. ~ Enviroboy TalkContribs - 00:33, 25 April 2007 (UTC)

Apology
I'm sorry, I thought I was helping. Wikipedia seemed to have the information in the wrong location on the Domestic partnership in the United States page, and I believed I corrected it without removing or adding any content. 69.140.19.116 21:42, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Sorry, that was my mistake, I didn't see that you added the information after removing it somewhere else... --Caltas 21:45, 27 April 2007 (UTC)

Cheers...would probably help my case a bit if I signed up for an account :) 69.140.19.116 21:50, 27 April 2007 (UTC)

Another thank you
Thank you for the multiple reverts and warnings to those who were vandalizing my user page today. &mdash; O cat ecir  Talk  00:11, 28 April 2007 (UTC)

Thanks!
Thanks for the vandal reverts on my userpage! CaptainVindaloo t c e 17:59, 28 April 2007 (UTC)

Revert to my User page
Cheers! Flowerpotman talk|contribs 20:26, 28 April 2007 (UTC)

Your userpage is semi-protected
I've just semi-protected your userpage because of the massive IP vandalism. -- FayssalF  - Wiki me up®  18:50, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Thanks, often I didn't even notice the vandalism... --Caltas 18:57, 29 April 2007 (UTC)

hey there
Thanks for reverting vandalism on my userpage. Much appreciated :)

Regards, xC | ☎ 20:46, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
 * No problem --Caltas 20:47, 29 April 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for reverting vandalism on my userpage, and looking at your contribs,

wow, thanks! --Caltas 11:11, 1 May 2007 (UTC)

Kindness barnstar
thanks :-) --Caltas 13:25, 1 May 2007 (UTC)

OMG SORRY
I was trying to test out how to use wikipedia. I didn't really understand what the sandbox was. I appreciate you stopping me before I did anymore harm. In the future I'll use the sandbox.

PPS: Can I have a link to the sandbox?

Sandbox --Caltas 17:41, 3 May 2007 (UTC)

Good Bull story
Thought you would get a kick out of this joke and story. — BQZip01 — talk 21:27, 3 May 2007 (UTC)

Thanks
... for reverting the vandalism on my userpage. :) - TwoOars ( T 18:29, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
 * no problem :-) --Caltas 18:30, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
 * (edit conflict)From your talk page it looks like you are some kind of Userpage anti-vandalism specialist. :) Happy editing. - TwoOars ( T 18:33, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
 * I revert just every vandalism I can find ;-) --Caltas 18:54, 4 May 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for reverting mine, too. Linnell 19:45, 4 May 2007 (UTC) again, no problem --Caltas 19:46, 4 May 2007 (UTC)

Thank you


has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing! Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message. For reverting vandalism on my userpage. Purgatory Fubar Converse or Snafu 22:43, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
 * thanks! --Caltas 11:44, 5 May 2007 (UTC)

Please!
I didn't vandalize on the "Peach" article! :( Maybe someone is trying to hack my IP or something. I will try to get a username account if that happens again, just give me a chance! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 71.250.54.23 (talk) 01:38, 5 May 2007 (UTC).

Someone with your IP vandalized this article yesterday , if that weren't you, getting an account might be the best solution... --Caltas 11:44, 5 May 2007 (UTC)

The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
thanks :-) --Caltas 11:44, 5 May 2007 (UTC)

Cheers!
For reverting my userpage, and getting that vandal's nonsense off. :) Sicanjal 19:56, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
 * no problem --Caltas 17:29, 7 May 2007 (UTC)

Danke
Hallo Caltas

Danke für das zerstören Zerstörungswut in Benutzerseite.

Alles Gute ! -- Adailton 22:44, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
 * gern geschehen :-) --Caltas 17:29, 7 May 2007 (UTC)

Re: Thanks
You're welcome. Happy to help. Will (aka Wimt ) 20:15, 7 May 2007 (UTC)

Thank you!
Just wanted to say thanks for reverting the vandalism to my userpage! Thanks and great work! --Entoaggie09 02:37, 8 May 2007 (UTC)

uw-vandal3 directly
Hello, I saw that you reverted some vandalism action on the mars article. Please avoid using the syntax directly. Even if you are certain of the bad faith of someone using a more neutral stance with is more appropriated. Admin don't block people with only one warning it's more a "3 strike and your out" philosophy.

the uw-vandal3 is a sort of last warning and an aggressive one, begining by a neutral warning then moving to a more clear last warning show a clear escalation of the blocking threat. After a uw-3 or uw-4, the user is a desperate case and you go to aiv.


 * Usually I begin with the uw-2 warnig, but there was much vandalism on the article Mars, so I used uw-3 directly. But thanks for the hint, I will avoid it in future... --Caltas 18:26, 8 May 2007 (UTC)

Thanks
For fixing vandalism to my user page. --Guinnog 20:19, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
 * you're welcome :-) --Caltas 20:20, 8 May 2007 (UTC)

I must have upset someone...
I want to thank you for reversing the very persistent vandal on my user page. It is greatly appreciated - I just wish I knew who and why. Oh well. It seems to have stopped now. Again, thanks.--User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 22:28, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
 * No problem.--Caltas 17:20, 9 May 2007 (UTC)

Thanks
Thank you for taking care of my vandalized user page...this is getting to be a regular thing!  Jody B talk 11:15, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
 * you're welcome.--Caltas 17:20, 9 May 2007 (UTC)

Thanks vandal fighter
Thank you for reverting the vandalism to my user page. That did just happen to be the first time my user page was vandalised... Camaron1 | Chris 18:15, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
 * you're welcome, happy editing! --Caltas 18:21, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
 * My user page is under total attack now by a (now) registered user, I have a lot to revert. Camaron1 | Chris 18:26, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
 * I saw it already and warned him, if he continues he will be blocked. --Caltas 18:30, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Thanks again for your help, I have managed to revert the remaining changes that had not already been reverted by you. Hopefully this user will be deterred by the more firm warnings now been given. Camaron1 | Chris 18:36, 9 May 2007 (UTC)

please can you leave my page alone
I am having a bit of fun, please leave it be —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Llamafish (talk • contribs) 18:52, 9 May 2007 (UTC).
 * Sorry, I thought it was vandalism. --Caltas 18:58, 9 May 2007 (UTC)

No, it wasn't, but thank you for apologising Llamafish 15:28, 10 May 2007 (UTC)

Hinweis
Die letzte Warnung war aber zwei Stunden zuvor gegeben. ;) Grüße, —DerHexer (Talk) 19:23, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Was da passiert ist, weiß ich nicht... (ich habe nämlich eigentlich zuerst gewarnt) --Caltas 19:28, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
 * An jedem neuen Tag bzw. nach jeder Sperrung müssen wir ja neu die Leute hinweisen. Es könnte ja eine dynamische IP-Adresse sein, auf die mehrere Benutzer zugreifen können. Aber hattest ja Glück, dass sie gleich wieder gesperrt wurde. —DerHexer (Talk) 19:34, 9 May 2007 (UTC) P. S.: Muss mal anmerken, dass du in diesem Monat schon sehr fleißig warst. :)
 * Oh, das Datum hatte ich wohl übersehen... und wenn du nicht so schnell wärst hätte ich wohl noch ein paar Edits mehr ;-) --Caltas 19:38, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Dafür bin ich auch nur noch recht selten hier. Komm fast jeden Tag erst 19 Uhr aus der Uni. —DerHexer (Talk) 19:39, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Uni dauert bei mir noch zwei Jahre, aber bis ich aus der Schule nach Hause komme, ist eigentlich auch immer zwischen vier und halb sechs... --Caltas 19:44, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Aber dann geht's ja hier auch erst richtig los. ;) Nicht so wie auf de.wp, wo man von 8 bis 12 unterwegs sein muss. ;) —DerHexer (Talk) 20:00, 9 May 2007 (UTC)

Danke für die Revision des Artikels "Brain"
Ich habe fast gleich dieselbe gemacht, bevor ich mich bemerkt habe, dass Sie die Artikel schon repariert haben. Wie können wir jemals diese Idioten loswerden? Sie sind eben ein großes Problem, aber mit Hilfe von Leuten wie Sie, können wir mindestens das Schadensausmaß, das sie verurmachen, ein bisschen beschränken.

--J Riddy 18:43, 10 May 2007 (UTC)


 * Loswerden kann man sie leider nicht, aber vielleicht wird es ihnen ja irgendwann einmal langweilig, Artikel zu vandalieren... Der größte Teil dieser Edits wird ja zum Glück schnell rückgängig gemacht. --Caltas 18:52, 10 May 2007 (UTC)

User talk:76.197.139.8
You are being trolled. Quite successfully. I've blocked him for a few hours and will now tap him with the cluestick. Please try to avoid reverting his talk page - he's getting off on it. Thanks and happy editing.

Sheffield Springs Academy
Thanks for your assistance with reverting the persistent vandalism to this page, and also thanks for showing me the correct way to warn vandals. There have been two IP numbers vandalizing this page but from internal evidence I suspect it's the same person. Could I trouble you to keep an eye on it along with me? Many thanks. Accounting4Taste 19:24, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
 * No problem, I will add the page to my watchlist. --Caltas 19:25, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

Thank you
For reverting vandalism on my userpage. — mholland (talk) 20:15, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

User talk:87.113.66.149 re André Derain
When I log off, Wikipedia seems to be acusing me of being this unidentified user; however, I have never even looked at the article mentioned and certainly never vandalized anything on Wikipedia. Perhaps you could advise how I might verify the link between the number and my computer. Thanks—GRM 07:24, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
 * I belive you that it was not you, who vandalized the article, but I'm sorry, I have just no idea, if and how you can verify the link between the IP and your computer... --Caltas(talk) 20:49, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

hey there
I just saw a whole bunch of reverts by you. Damn you're fast!

I wanted to ask you, what tools do you use? I help out on RCP whenever I can, and I was using WP:MWT. But its newest release is unstable and VP gets slow after sometime. Just wondering if there were any modifications or scripts which you might recommend :)

regards, xC | ☎ 07:39, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
 * There are a lot of people who are faster than me ;-). I use WP:VF to watch the recent changes and revert with WP:TWINKLE. I'm very comfortable with them, but since I haven't tried any other tool, I cannot tell you, if there are better ones... --Caltas(talk) 20:49, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
 * I had tried TW once, but I think I messed up in the configuration, it never worked for me... Thanks for telling me, I'll have a go at it now! Thank you! xC | ☎ 12:03, 17 May 2007 (UTC)

Thanks
...for reverting the vandalism on my user page. I owe you one! Will2710 |Talk! 17:13, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
 * You're welcome, happy editing! --Caltas(talk) 17:14, 17 May 2007 (UTC)

And thank you again for the same thing! Girolamo Savonarola 20:25, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Thanks again for the same thing. [[Image:Smiley.svg|18px]]User:Rock2e Talk - Contribs 13:38, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
 * No problem ;-) --Caltas(talk) 13:39, 19 May 2007 (UTC)

Dear caltas
You gave me a warning that i "vandalize" on May 17, 2007 an indian reserve topic, when i was not on the computer on May 17, 2007... so can you check if you sent the warning to the right IP because i don't you have the rigth to send someone warning signs if they do not deserve a warning sig. Also the IP address intended to be mine is wrong and you might sent it to the wrong IP so please check agian because i know my computer was not on on the said date and this is making me frustrated at wikipedia so please again check. If you want proof that i did not vandalize or even edited a topic in wikipedia go to my history page and you'll that i have'nt edited a think in wiki only your warning sign is shown so please can you remove the warning --69.158.105.45 05:40, 22 May 2007 (UTC)accused
 * Well, I took the liberty of double-checking for Caltas and I can assure you that there was no mistake with the IP address. I would invite you to verify the following edit made on the Indian reserve page by the IP address in question . For further assurance, you may also check the list of contributions made by the IP address, and you'll notice that the edit Caltas was referring to was indeed made. — Dorvaq (talk) 13:44, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Sorry for responding so late, but the last two days I had a lot to do in real life... Like Dorvaq has already said above, your IP did the edit and was therefore warned correctly. But this means not necessarily that it was you who edited the page, because IP-adresses change periodically. So if this was not you, just ignore the warning or consider creating an account to avoid such confusions. --Caltas(talk) 12:43, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry
I believe the Ip 66.203.52.24 is a sockpuppet or being used by 66.203.52.37. This is clear on the history of Tom Petty as they have vandalized the same article in the same way within minutes of eachother an they have a similar IP. Can a Ip be suspected as a sockpuppet of another IP? I am not really sure as I don't get invlolved in the suspeccted sockpuppet stuff to often. Thanks and happy editing!  •F e l i x• T 13:26, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
 * yes, I had the same thought, but I also don't know much about this sockpuppet stuff... maybe it's better you ask someone else... --Caltas(talk) 13:30, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

Thanks!
Thanks for reverting vandalism on my userpage! Stwalkerster talk review 17:13, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

Thank you
Thank you so much for reverting the vandalism on my page. I've been having some vandal issues lately. I hope someday I can return the favor. Have a wonderful day! Saber girl  08  17:14, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
 * No problem, happy editing! --Caltas(talk) 17:15, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

Vandalism by 70.89.137.177
I would like you to know that the IP address 70.89.137.177 belongs to a school, and hundreds of people, many of them immature, use it every day. Repeated attempts at vandalism have been made from this address, as you can see from the associated User talk page. If you feel it prudent to completely block non-logged users from editing Wikipedia from this IP, I for one would have no objections. At the very least any changes should be tracked carefully.

Thanks for your work.

--5ir 3ntropy 21:17, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
 * I'm no administrator at wikipedia, so I can't block IPs. All I do is to revert the vandalim, warn the users and IPs, who committed the vandalism, and report them to the AIV when they continue vandalizing. --Caltas(talk) 12:13, 2 June 2007 (UTC)

A Barnstar
thanks :-) --Caltas(talk) 12:13, 2 June 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for the revert!!
Thanks for the revert on my userpage. I was just browsing through the recent changes, and didn't see it. Keep the good work up !! Patar knight 20:33, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
 * No problem, happy enditing! --Caltas(talk) 20:52, 2 June 2007 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks for picking up the vandalism on my userpage. Recurring dreams 11:18, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
 * you're welcome. --Caltas (talk) 11:18, 1 July 2007 (UTC)

Thanks from me, as well. Deor 16:02, 1 July 2007 (UTC)

STERN KOREAN NO
No. TheGhostOfPastMistakes 14:34, 1 July 2007 (UTC)

Userpage vandalism
You are totally on top of the userpage vandalism today! Thanks, and nice job! IronGargoyle 18:26, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
 * No problem, happy editing ;-) --Caltas (talk) 18:35, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Do you have my userpage on your watchlist or something? Thanks again. :-) IronGargoyle 19:26, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
 * I see everything ;-) --Caltas (talk) 19:29, 3 July 2007 (UTC)

Excellent and extremely fast
I just saw the Talk:Mars vandalism, and tried to figure out how to fix it. When I went to click on the history page (to find an older version), I saw that you had already fixed it! Just want to add my voice to the choir of appreciative people. Thanks! Ben Hocking (talk) 17:32, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
 * :-) --Caltas (talk) 17:34, 2 July 2007 (UTC)

Presidential iq hoax
I deleated this page not because i wanted to vandalize wikipedia bit i believe it is biased and not educational.
 * You can't delete a page by simply blanking it, if want an article to be deleted, you have to nomintate it for deletion. --Caltas (talk) 17:30, 2 July 2007 (UTC)

Thank you:
im offended

Howdy!!!
Hi there buddy! It's a great day for correcting spelling errors and grammer on wikipedia! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 137.240.136.81 (talk • contribs)
 * grammar and spelling errors? --Caltas (talk) 19:13, 5 July 2007 (UTC)

Thanks a bunch for restoring the Makara Jyothi article :) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.164.168.97 (talk • contribs)
 * no problem :-)--Caltas (talk) 16:55, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

userpage vandalism
Thanks for reverting that! Lugnuts 20:28, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

User talk:Robertmullen01
Too late, I'm afraid he is history now. Vandal-only account. Best wishes, --John 17:23, 9 July 2007 (UTC)