User talk:Calton/Archive25

The Wikipedia Library needs you!
We hope The Wikipedia Library has been a useful resource for your work. TWL is expanding rapidly and we need your help!

With only a couple hours per week, you can make a big difference for sharing knowledge. Please sign up and help us in one of these ways: Sign up now Send on behalf of The Wikipedia Library using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:31, 7 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Account coordinators: help distribute free research access
 * Partner coordinators: seek new donations from partners
 * Communications coordinators: share updates in blogs, social media, newsletters and notices
 * Technical coordinators: advise on building tools to support the library's work
 * Outreach coordinators: connect to university libraries, archives, and other GLAMs
 * Research coordinators: run reference services

Speedy deletion nomination of Strictly-Correlated-Electrons Density Functional Theory
Hello Calton,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Strictly-Correlated-Electrons Density Functional Theory for deletion, because it seems to be a test. Did you know that the Wikipedia Sandbox is available for testing out edits?

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. TheLongTone (talk) 16:18, 11 November 2015 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun! Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from, SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 09:51, 14 November 2015 (UTC)

Hans-Joachim Schäfers
I have reverted you in Hans-Joachim Schäfers. Please carefully read Proposed deletion of biographies of living people. Thanks. Sam Sailor Talk! 14:22, 16 November 2015 (UTC)

Regarding your deletions concerning Westgate House and Crown House
Calton, we welcome your contributions. However, it appears you have an external relationship with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Crown House Business Centre. If so, you have a conflict of interest.

People with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, see the conflict of interest guideline and frequently asked questions for organizations. In particular, please:


 * avoid editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, its competitors, or projects and products you or they are involved with;
 * instead, propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the template);
 * avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
 * exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use require disclosure of your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing, and autobiographies.

Regarding your other deletions related to terrorism
Your trail of deletions on the following articles related to terrorism have been reviewed: In many cases, you improperly deleted material that was properly cited and material to the article on which it appeared. Terrorist groups using charitable organizations to finance activity is real. It is well-documented in reputable sources. The text you deleted was factual reporting.
 * Palestinian Return Centre
 * Crown House Business Centre
 * International HIV Fund
 * Muslim Charities Forum
 * Emirates Centre for Human Rights

You are welcome to help build these articles with additional information cited to reputable sources. '''If you have counter-evidence, write it up and cite it to a reputable source. Don’t just delete text you don’t personally like.''' Fact Checkmater (talk) 15:19, 16 November 2015 (UTC)

Personal attacks
Carlton, as fellow editors, we should be respectful of each other's efforts to contribute to Wikipedia, despite our disagreements.

However, your personal attacks against my user account are a violation of Wikipedia's conduct policies. Per WP:WIAPA, "Insulting or disparaging an editor is a personal attack regardless of the manner in which it is done."

Below is a list of the personal attacks you have written about my user account:

1. On my user Talk page, you wrote: "And this based on what, exactly? Aside from the voices inside your head?" https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Fact_Checkmater#Re:_conflict_of_interest

2. On my user Talk page, you wrote: "Bullshit" and "Bottom line: if you're looking for a soapbox for your crusade, go start a blog." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Fact_Checkmater#POV

3. In an edit summary, you wrote: "Look up WP:UNDUE and WP:SYNTH before you continue your crusade." https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Emirates_Centre_for_Human_Rights&oldid=690924688

Please review WP:PERSONAL. "Do not make personal attacks anywhere in Wikipedia. Comment on content, not on the contributor. Personal attacks harm the Wikipedia community, and the collegial atmosphere needed to create a good encyclopedia. Derogatory comments about other editors may be removed by any editor. Repeated or egregious personal attacks may lead to sanctions including blocks.

Thank you. Fact Checkmater (talk) 16:38, 20 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:53, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

ANI notice
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Fact Checkmater (talk) 19:50, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

What is the purpose of the Sandbox?
Thanks Calton. I am using (or thought I was using) my sandbox to draft my article but you've flagged it for speedy deletion - is the sandbox not the place to create drafts? Have I done it incorrectly? If not the Sandbox, where can I create a draft within Wikipedia? Rebmaeneri (talk) 17:20, 24 November 2015 (UTC)


 * has answered you on your talk page. Sam Sailor Talk! 20:51, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

AWB
I have enabled your AWB access. -- Biblio worm  14:53, 25 November 2015 (UTC)

AfD
Request to revisit the discussion at Articles for deletion/Teaching clinic per sources presented therein. North America1000 19:44, 7 January 2016 (UTC)

Civility
As I mentioned on the autism list talk page, I have never seen you before and can see no reason why you would suddenly be an authority on the quality of the list's sources. You may impress yourself with your vituperative remarks, but they don't mean shit to me. Come up with some substance, or be silent. 50.185.134.48 (talk) 23:25, 24 January 2016 (UTC)

ANI
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Smartyllama (talk) 01:09, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

January 2016
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for making personal attacks towards other editors. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Drmies (talk) 02:04, 27 January 2016 (UTC)


 * Calton, you may have been right to have been exasperated to some extent, but that's not an excuse to freely dispense insults and sarcasm. Drmies (talk) 02:05, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
 * You were right elsewhere, as far as I'm concerned: in that AfD. Drmies (talk) 03:05, 28 January 2016 (UTC)

Category discussion
Categories for discussion/Log/2016 January 31 50.185.134.48 (talk) 00:47, 31 January 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 14
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Potable water diver, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Scuba. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:40, 14 July 2016 (UTC)

Alert (Donald Trump)
Dervorguilla (talk) 03:57, 8 August 2016 (UTC)

Redaction
Hi, I see that you came along long before me, back in the days when the number of active editors was doubling annually. I do not know what one edit ended that and caused it to decline by 6% per year instead. I carefully protect my anonymity and it would help me greatly if you deleted and marked as ( redacted ) the references to my primary account. I do freely tell people in private what it is but there are some who would want to know just so they can out me and that is totally forbidden and not a good idea to enable. Also I have never and will never identify myself as male or female as a means of further protecting my identity, and prefer that no one else do so either, so if you could also change it to "he or she", they, them, or anything non-gender, that would help. Also please per AGF recognize that I am no more abusing Wikipedia than you are, which in both cases is none. If you know of any charts that are needed or would be useful, please let me know (contact me on commons on either my primary account or this one - both are active there (and no they are not used inappropriately). I am always looking for interesting things to do, and the 8,000 charts cover all subjects. Thanks. Apteva (talk) 07:40, 8 October 2016 (UTC)
 * No. --Calton | Talk 09:26, 8 October 2016 (UTC)


 * Threads are easier to follow if they are not splattered all over the place. What one edit cause the colony collapse of Wikipedia in 2007? Prior to that we were gaining editors at the rate of 100% per year, after losing them at 6% each year. That was four years after you started editing, and a year before I created a user name (I was basically an IP user so I have no idea when my first edit was, nor have I been able to find it, but was given high praise for my edits in July of 2007, and registered this and my primary username - a week earlier - in 2008). So I doubt it was anything I did, but it was so sudden and so dramatic that it seems certain to have happened because of only one editor (it wasn't you). Nothing of the sort happened to any of the other wikis, just enwiki, and it was a poison that persisted until 2013. Apteva (talk) 03:53, 9 October 2016 (UTC)

No. --Calton | Talk 09:26, 8 October 2016 (UTC)

Ah, so NEW irrelevant breathless bafflegab. Please put on your reading glasses, then. Ready?


 * NO. --Calton | Talk 07:16, 9 October 2016 (UTC)


 * No reply. Apteva (talk) 14:34, 9 October 2016 (UTC)
 * @Apteva - this is a question about your behaviour, not anyone else's. Andy Dingley (talk) 16:06, 9 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Yes but as I am on Wikibreak there is no behaviour. I just do not have time for Wikipedia this week, at all. But if you look at the chart above you can see that Wikipedia went from being fun and exciting to abruptly crashing and burning around April or May of 2007, a poison that continued until 2013, and even now while we have had a stable number of active editors but are attracting fewer new editors and fewer casual editors so we are clearly still doing something wrong. If we can identify what one event caused the collapse in 2007 we can figure out how to heal it. It was likely not anyone who has posted on this talk page, but as the editor in question has been a user for four years longer than myself, they are in an excellent position to help figure out what went wrong. If your account was created say before 2006 you would be too. So this is only about getting Wikipedia back on track and nothing else. Just to clarify I do not want to know who might have contributed to the collapse, as that is completely water under the dam, and could long ago be someone who has disappeared into the void of the Internet, but only what edit, action, behaviour, pattern, whatever, that caused the collapse, and what was done in 2015, if anything, to halt the 6% decline of active editors. For the last three years we have not been losing any but have also not been gaining any. This is a collaborative project, so who does anything never matters, other than to address their action to prevent damage, and the only thing that matters is if something gets done. Looking at my backlog, on October 20, 2013 I noticed that List of countries by future gross government debt needed work, and while the outdated tag is gone it still says "estimated future gross?" with a request for clarification that can be done, and who does it never matters, only that it does get done. It should be disturbing to everyone that an edit did not get done for a year and a half when someone who knew about it could have and would have. Cheers. Apteva (talk) 18:37, 9 October 2016 (UTC)

Drumpf
I've noticed in your recent edits that you replace the name "Trump" with "Drumpf". If I assumed bad faith, I would you're purposefully vandalizing these articles. If I assumed good faith, I would assume you have this Chrome extension enabled. Either way, I'd urge you to cease and desist and fix your recent edits. FallingGravity 18:01, 14 October 2016 (UTC)

Your removal of PopMatters sourcing
Hi. Why are you removing PopMatters' sources? It seems you are removing the sources because you find the critics to be non-WP:Notable. Many of the critics we use for sourcing on this site are not notable enough for their own Wikipedia articles. What matters is whether the sources are reliable and whether the critical commentary is being given undue weight. In this case, you removed the source as unneeded, but that source was added because (if I'm remembering correctly) someone challenged that part of the sentence. I didn't add that source, but I don't see why it needed removal. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 23:59, 2 November 2016 (UTC)