User talk:CalumCookable

Windows Phone 7
Hello CalumCookable. There were too many changes in a single edit to sort it all out. The entire missing features section seemed to have been deleted. I don't mind people adding any facts to the article, if they're well referenced and verified accurate. But I also don't like to see well referenced facts deleted.-- Lester  12:35, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Your rearrangement of the article is not good, because you did not discuss what you were going to do before you did it, and therefore did not seek consensus on it. I suggest you revert your own edit.-- Lester  12:48, 6 September 2010 (UTC)

talkback

 * thanks-- in te la ti (Call) 18:13, 6 September 2010 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you must sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 18:18, 6 September 2010 (UTC)

WP:ANI
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Here-- in te la ti (Call) 18:44, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
 * I have taken Lester's disruptive action to this page. Hopefully the Sysops will do something about it. thanks-- in te la ti (Call) 16:10, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Careful, I would not go as far as that. It is obvious that he is disruptive. See above for conclusion of statement.-- in te la ti (Call) 16:16, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Thank you :) CalumCookable (talk) 16:20, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Your welcome, I requested action on the conflict, now all we have to do is wait.-- in te la ti (Call) 16:35, 7 September 2010 (UTC)

Edit warring at Windows Phone 7
Your comment here is basically a declaration that you intend to edit war on this article: "I will continue to maintain my improved version of the article and revert all your reverts until I am banned." You should consider removing or striking through this comment, since other people will consider it embarrassing. If you actually pursue this battle at Windows Phone 7, you may be blocked for WP:Edit warring. You are expected to patiently work for consensus on the talk page. There is a process called WP:Dispute resolution that is recommended for disputes which you can't easily resolve. See uw-3rr for an explanation of the three-revert rule. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 00:07, 8 September 2010 (UTC)