User talk:Calvin999/Archive 11

DYK for Cockiness (Love It)
Casliber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 16 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks Calvin  &bull; Watch  n'  Learn 12:16, 16 December 2011 (UTC)

DYK for Red Lipstick
Orlady (talk) 22:10, 16 December 2011 (UTC) 09:02, 17 December 2011 (UTC)

You're racking up those DYK's Calv. :L — Status  &#x7B;talk contribs  20:44, 19 December 2011 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Skin (Rihanna song)
The article Skin (Rihanna song) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within seven days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:Skin (Rihanna song) for things which need to be addressed. Jona yo! Selena 4 ever  01:36, 20 December 2011 (UTC)

Song articles
Hey Aaron. First off, I wrote to you on my page :) Next, I seem to disagree with some of these newly created song articles, and would like to first discuss it with you, as you are the main RiRi guy. So, articles like "Red Lipstick" and "Fool in Love" seem to be pushing the envelope of notability. "Cockiness (Love It)" is also an issue. See, even if "WHYB" or "TTT" didn't receive much coverage yet (still far more than these three), they are most probably singles 3 & 4, so there isn't a point in messing with them. These three, however, are bonus tracks and songs that I can assure you won't ever see the light of day. Another issue, they are all around 12K of info, with most of it being a re-hash (no offense intended buddy, I did the same with Mimi albums ;)) of background info on Loud and TTT as a whole, though 'nothing directly correlated to the songs or their composition. Without the "Background and development" sections, they maybe have two paragraphs of actual info a piece. I am not going to lie to you, I would like to see these three articles deleted.-- CallMe Nathan  &bull;  Talk2Me   21:08, 19 December 2011 (UTC)
 * To be honest Nathan, they pass WP:SONGS, and have all charted on several charts. Actually, I acknowledge that there isn't a lot of info on them, because I haven't finished adding to them. Look at the Lead on Cockiness for example, not finished yet. They aren't any different to Rather Die Young, Kitty Kat (song) or Honesty (the latter of which isn't even a single). Calvin  &bull; Watch  n'  Learn 13:17, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Don't even try to bring Beyonce's articles again. Her articles are well written. Did you read their composition sections, the critical reception, etc. And "Honesty" is a cover. Jivesh 1205  (Talk) 13:26, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Jivesh, when have I ever said that Beyonce articles are not well written? Never. I'm simply using a few as examples. Why should one of the thee Nathan mentioned be deleted when Honesty is two paragraphs long? This is not going to turn into an argument, there is no need for it and it is pointless. It ends here. Calvin  &bull; Watch  n'  Learn 13:29, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
 * They cannot be used to exemplify what you want. Her articles meet both WP:GNG and WP:NSONGS. Jivesh 1205 (Talk) 13:31, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
 * So do the Rihanna ones. I can't help that there is about 10x the amount of Critical info for 4 than Talk That Talk. Mores to the point, Skin and Freakum Dress never charted, but they are here still. Calvin  &bull; Watch  n'  Learn 13:33, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Oh yes and what about the composition? So you mean that the TTT song articles meet WP:GNG? And your statement is false. There are nearly the same numbers of reviews for both albums. It just depends on how much patience you have to filter Google search results. And I don't know about "Skin" but it is an article that can be greatly improved. It does not even stand next to FD and you know that. Jivesh 1205 (Talk) 13:37, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
 * There is hardly no info, and they have all charted on multiple charts. Fine, I will re-construct them then. And about Skin, are you saying I'm shit and writing articles and you are perfect? Calvin  &bull; Watch  n'  Learn 13:41, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
 * No I never said that. Just like you never said that Beyonce articles are not well written. If you interpreted my sentence with so much negativity... I can't help it. I also never said I was perfect. If I was, I would have only supports at the FAC with no comment on the prose, etc. What I mean was that FD is not in the same vein on "Skin". Even if I remove that background section and its video, it still has a decent composition, CR and live performances. Jivesh 1205 (Talk) 13:45, 20 December 2011 (UTC)

Well that's what it sounded like by saying "It does not even stand next to FD and you know that.", which does imply that the article is not well written. Let's stop here, it's unnecessary. I'm not in a good mood now after waking up to a few messages on my talk page and this is not making it better. I think it's good I am leaving on Saturday, will give me some thinking time. Calvin  &bull; Watch n'  Learn 13:49, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
 * I am also not fighting. It just annoys me that you always bring Beyonce articles. Enjoy your leave. Try to relax. Take care. Jivesh 1205 (Talk) 13:51, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Jivesh, it's nothing against you that I use Beyonce articles as examples; next to Rihanna's, hers are the ones I am most familiar with. And I hope that we will speak between now and Saturday. Calvin  &bull; Watch  n'  Learn 13:55, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Of course, we will. We have conflicts as editors, not as friends. Jivesh 1205 (Talk) 13:59, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Good. Calvin  &bull; Watch  n'  Learn 14:01, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Let's settle down guys. Its only a discussion, no need to get flustered. I understand that there might be information still on the songs that has not been added yet, and I'm not one to look to delete stuff, but in the future, please try and maybe hold them in your sandboxes until they are more developed. That way we avoid these kind of unnecessary discussions.-- CallMe Nathan  &bull;  Talk2Me   20:16, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
 * I have stopped counting the number of times I asked Calvin to use a sandbox. Jivesh 1205 (Talk) 05:29, 21 December 2011 (UTC)

Edit warring
You seem to be edit warring on Te Amo, per and. You really haven't got a leg to stand on: the material is sourced properly to the physical magazine. That's what's demanded in WP:Record charts and supported by WP:V.&mdash;Kww(talk) 03:32, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Two reverts is not edit warring, the second of which was a mistake. I did press cancel but it did it anyway. I didn't break the three-revert rule so don't come here giving me all that. User:Decodet actually did make three reverts but you haven't warned him I see, such double standards. Calvin  &bull; Watch  n'  Learn 13:19, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Did you see a template or a big red warning sign? Just because I'm an admin doesn't mean that every comment I make is a prelude to a block or something. Decodet knows not to go past 3RR, but he's in the frustrating case of reverting edits that are going against guidelines but aren't vandalism. Your second revert (the mistake) had no summary, which was what caught my eye.&mdash;Kww(talk) 13:38, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
 * But still, he made more reverts than me, thus edit warred more with me. Yet you haven't warned him. Calvin  &bull; Watch  n'  Learn 13:42, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Because if he crosses 3RR, I will block him without warning.&mdash;Kww(talk) 13:49, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
 * I still think you should have left him a message as well, I don't think it's fair how you have only warned me even though he reverted me more. Calvin  &bull; Watch  n'  Learn 13:56, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Weren't you still involved in the conflict? | help dןǝɥ  | 05:46, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
 * I made two reverts, Decodet made three. Yet only I was warned. Not that you need to know. Calvin  &bull; Watch  n'  Learn 13:41, 21 December 2011 (UTC)

Congratulations
Hi, Calvin. How are you doing? I've just watched you're the one who edits on most of Rihanna articles and I had to come here to congratulate you for your work! I'm from Brazil and I also contribute on articles about music (my favorite singers are Kerli and Pixie Lott) on the Portuguese Wikipedia because I want to improve their quality as much as I can. Keep on doing your amazing work here on Wikipedia. I really like to read the Rihanna articles you edit. (Sorry if my English is bad). Greetings from Brazil, Lucas RdS (talk) 12:43, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks that's really nice of you to say. Calvin  &bull; Watch  n'  Learn 13:42, 21 December 2011 (UTC)

Note to talk page stalkers.
Could someone upload an audio file from We Ride which is 10% the length of 3:50 please. Calvin  &bull; Watch n'  Learn 15:12, 21 December 2011 (UTC)

My Sincere Wishes For This Festive Season

 * Thanks Jivesh. Same to you too! Calvin  &bull; Watch  n'  Learn 16:35, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
 * You are welcome and thanks. Jivesh 1205 (Talk) 16:42, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Could you glance over the Composition section of We Ride please. Calvin  &bull; Watch  n'  Learn 16:46, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Lol. Wait. Jivesh 1205 (Talk) 16:50, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Quite good attempt but the first sentence is irrelevant there. Jivesh 1205 (Talk) 17:12, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Now? Calvin  &bull; Watch  n'  Learn 17:46, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
 * WR is good now. WFL- well I have never seen an article about a video being an FA. All I can say is that the video forms pat of the article. So you better fix the article and to take it to FA first, then do the video. Jivesh 1205 (Talk) 05:09, 23 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Wow, that's huge. I am already quite busy with SL. But I will see what I can do. I don't promise a great MV section but still, I do what I can. Jivesh 1205 (Talk) 15:04, 23 December 2011 (UTC)
 * It doesn't matter, as long there is something informational for readers. I don't have much time today, but I will try and finish things I started this week. But I don't have time to write an entire music video section and look for sources today. Thanks :). Calvin  &bull; Watch  n'  Learn 15:18, 23 December 2011 (UTC)
 * You are welcome. Jivesh 1205 (Talk) 15:24, 23 December 2011 (UTC)

Re: Sorry
No problem! If you want to review it after your trip you can too! :) - Saulo  Talk to Me 23:04, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
 * No it's okay. I've already half reviewed it in the other one anyway lol. Calvin  &bull; Watch  n'  Learn 15:41, 23 December 2011 (UTC)

Goodbye Wikipedian Friends
I am leaving for America tomorrow morning for two weeks and I doubt I will be able to come online. I am taking my laptop with me though. I hope you all have a great christmas and I wish you all a Happy New Year! If people could add the Rihanna GA articles to their watchlists to make sure IPs don't get too merry over christmas that would be great. Also, my GAN of Music of the Sun hasn't been reviewed as of now, so if it does could someone carry out the necessary changes for me please? There will be a barnstar in it for you! Haha. Byeeeeeeeeeee! Calvin  &bull; Watch n'  Learn 15:23, 23 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Enjoy and take care. And barnstar? LOL LOL LOL You did not give me one when I did so much for you. :P Jivesh 1205 (Talk) 15:25, 23 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Hope you enjoy America! Lol, i have a MAJOR talk page stalking problem. Ben • Talk That Talk 2me  16:05, 23 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Lol, let me know when you make it here! The weather's great. :D — WP: PENGUIN  · [ TALK ]  18:01, 23 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Yup, in Virginia, it's 62 degrees. Ben • Talk That Talk 2me  18:24, 23 December 2011 (UTC)
 * I don't understand farenheit lol. We don't use that. Calvin  &bull; Watch  n'  Learn 18:25, 23 December 2011 (UTC)
 * 17 C. — WP: PENGUIN  · [ TALK ]  18:28, 23 December 2011 (UTC)
 * I think Orlando is about 22/23 C. Here in England it is 5 C lol. Calvin  &bull; Watch  n'  Learn 18:30, 23 December 2011 (UTC)
 * A bit higher, maybe around 25. It's minus 5 at my home. — WP: PENGUIN  · [ TALK ]  18:31, 23 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Lol, i don't understand Celsius. Ben • Talk That Talk 2me  18:34, 23 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Celsius makes sense to me because 0 is freezing point, which is logical lol. Calvin  &bull; Watch  n'  Learn 18:38, 23 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Metric is the way to go. — WP: PENGUIN  · [ TALK ]  18:40, 23 December 2011 (UTC)

December 2011
Your recent editing history at Rehab (Rihanna song) shows that you are in danger of breaking the three-revert rule, or that you may have already broken it. An editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Breaking the three-revert rule often leads to a block.

If you wish to avoid being blocked, instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to discuss the changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. You may still be blocked for edit warring even if you do not exceed the technical limit of the three-revert rule if your behavior indicates that you intend to continue to revert repeatedly. — Legolas ( talk 2 me ) 14:44, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Oh please. I, and emphasis on I, haven't crossed over it and know not to. If only you knew what was been said about people you "think" you are friends with. Calvin  &bull; Watch  n'  Learn 14:49, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Calvin, the template says on danger of breaking 3RR. Please read, and I don't fucking care what else you have to say. Got it? — Legolas ( talk 2 me ) 14:50, 26 December 2011 (UTC)

Sorry
cant find out how to edit on an iPod touch so i'll have to make a new section. Anyways I made a twitter and looked at a list people who tweet about Rihanna. Will you follow me?-- Ben • Talk That Talk 2me 22:08, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Yep, but no tweeting to me about anything Wikipedia related. At all. lol. Calvin  &bull; Watch  n'  Learn 22:09, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
 * I have a life after Wikipedia. And better things to talk about lol. Thanks! Uggh sorry about all the new sections I gotta go lol bye.

Happy holidays

 * Thanks, you too! :) Calvin  &bull; Watch  n'  Learn 06:51, 27 December 2011 (UTC)

Hmm
I will be gone by then. But I will come back in exactly 45 mins. At 15 00 UTC. Jivesh 1205 (Talk) 14:07, 28 December 2011 (UTC)
 * I might not be on, but if I am, then it will only be for 5 minutes. Calvin  &bull; Watch  n'  Learn 14:29, 28 December 2011 (UTC)
 * So let me guess, you are by Disney World? Lol, I saw MC there in December from like 15 feet away :D-- CallMe Nathan  &bull;  Talk2Me   00:52, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Lol yes. We are across the road from Downtown Disney. Christina Aguilera was here the other day. Did you get pics of Mariah? You're in Miami aren't you. Calvin  &bull; Watch  n'  Learn 01:00, 29 December 2011 (UTC)

This ...
... notttttttttt composition. Jivesh 1205 (Talk) 04:52, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
 * But it's about the lyrics? Calvin  &bull; Watch  n'  Learn 04:55, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
 * No, it is 100% critical commentary. cringey ... genuine elastic thrill, twisting into all sorts of jaw-dropping musical shapes ... we're pretty sure she's not talking about the chicken pot pie she left for dinner . < Obvious reception. Jivesh 1205 (Talk) 04:56, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
 * What about Jason Lipshutz? Calvin  &bull; Watch  n'  Learn 04:58, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Jason Lipshutz of Billboard magazine noted that Rihanna's vocals in the lyrics "I love it, I love it, I love it when you eat it," offer "coos" about wanting sex. This can remain. Jivesh 1205 (Talk) 05:03, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
 * OKay. Have a looked at the Background info I just wrote, just found such a much needed source!!! Calvin  &bull; Watch  n'  Learn 05:04, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Hmm, improve the presentation and alignment. Jivesh 1205 (Talk) 05:10, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Okay. Can you come online in about 10 minutes? Calvin  &bull; Watch  n'  Learn 05:11, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Yessssssssssssssssssssss. I would love to. Lolzzzzzzzz. Jivesh 1205 (Talk) 05:15, 30 December 2011 (UTC)

Happy New Year!

 * Thank you, you too! It's 10:10pm on Dec 31st here in Florida! lol Calvin  &bull; Watch  n'  Learn 03:09, 1 January 2012 (UTC)

My Top 20 songs/singles of 2011 (As I am still in 2011 for another hour and 5 minutes!)

 * 1) "S&M" - Rihanna
 * 2) "Run the World (Girls)" - Beyoncé
 * 3) "We Found Love" - Rihanna ft. Calvin Harris
 * 4) "Super Bass" - Nicki Minaj
 * 5) "Someone Like You - Adele
 * 6) "Fool in Love" - Rihanna
 * 7) "Rolling in the Deep" - Adele
 * 8) "The Edge of Glory" - Lady Gaga
 * 9) "Moves Like Jagger" - Maroon 5 ft. Christina Aguilera
 * 10) "The One That Got Away - Katy Perry
 * 11) "Dance for You" - Beyoncé
 * 12) "Take Care - Drake ft. Rihanna
 * 13) "You da One - Rihanna
 * 14) "Set Fire to the Rain" - Adele
 * 15) "Till the World Ends" - Britney Spears
 * 16) "On the Floor" - Jennifer Lopez ft. Pitbull
 * 17) "She Makes Me Wanna" - JLS
 * 18) "Right There" - Nicole Scherzinger ft. 50 Cent
 * 19) "Down for Whatever" - Kelly Rowland
 * 20) "Collide" - Leona Lewis & Avicii  Calvin  &bull; Watch  n'  Learn 03:51, 1 January 2012 (UTC)


 * *weeps* Where is BTINH? Jivesh 1205 (Talk) 06:45, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Lol. I got tired of it after a while. I listened to it too much. Calvin  &bull; Watch  n'  Learn 15:24, 1 January 2012 (UTC)

Happy New Year
Thanks. I love that cake ^^. We call it Yule Log lol. You wikilove's are always so inventive! Calvin  &bull; Watch n'  Learn 00:19, 2 January 2012 (UTC)
 * I (actually) had buche on New Years Eve at a French restaurant here (eh, even in Indonesia...). Not as nice as this one, but eh, it's chocolate :-D Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:35, 2 January 2012 (UTC)

Happy New Year
Thank you. I wish you and your family the same thing in 2012. My love is love (talk) 00:11, 2 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks :).  Calvin  &bull; Watch  n'  Learn 00:14, 2 January 2012 (UTC)

HNY!!!
Happy New Year to you as well!!! Love your songs of 2011 list...excellent choices, all! <3 Miko -- miko mango  mwa!  01:39, 2 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks :) Calvin  &bull; Watch  n'  Learn 01:40, 2 January 2012 (UTC)

New Year!
Thank you, a happy new year with health and happiness for you. Good job with Rihanna's articles. We're an army, better yet, a Navy :) VítoR™  Talk That Shit 04:01, 2 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Haha :P. Thanks. Calvin  &bull; Watch  n'  Learn 04:29, 2 January 2012 (UTC)

Please have a look here

 * here. Jivesh 1205 (Talk) 16:31, 2 January 2012 (UTC)

Talkback
Braincricket (talk) 15:27, 5 January 2012 (UTC)

Hey!
Hey ! How are you? Please look at this. xD ! — Tomica1111  &bull;  Question Existing?  15:36, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Hello. That will be a big table. Not really sure what you want me to do though? Calvin  &bull; Watch  n'  Learn 15:38, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
 * No nothing. I just wanted to show you how much release did "Hate That I Love You" got. I mean, nearly all of Rihanna songs get all of this release. Hey, why don't you create a release section for "We Found Love" video? — Tomica1111  &bull;  Question Existing?  16:46, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Oh okay. I don't know, I guess I could. Calvin  &bull; Watch  n'  Learn 16:49, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
 * You could, it will be good for the article. And to be honest, even if its shorter, I think it could more easily become FA, then "S&M". My opinion. — Tomica1111  &bull;  Question Existing?  16:50, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
 * If Rehab can become an FA, then so can S&M. Don't take that offensively. Calvin  &bull; Watch  n'  Learn 16:53, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
 * I do not take it, but by my opinion (and you will see that this opinion will share nearly all the reviewers at the FAC when you nominate it, as it was until now) its hard that the article will pass FA. Already Jivesh told you that. Just a friendly advice. Trust me or not. — Tomica1111  &bull;  Question Existing?  16:55, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
 * This is the last I will say of this, but Rehab passed because your close personal friends, who also massively edited the article during the FAC, supported it. Therefore, if your friends are going to help you and (wrongly, in my opinion) going to support it afterwards, then it is easy for it to pass, especially if you get an FA delegate who doesn't care about such things. That was the main reason why I had a problem with Rehab passing, but I don't think I have ever given you a straight up answer. Now I have, and we have got things clear, I will forget about it so that World War 3 doesn't start! And I will make S&M an FA. Calvin  &bull; Watch  n'  Learn 17:03, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Well I can't be indifferent when I read this of course. You are totally wrong ! But, I don't care. I just wanted to help you here. And Good Luck with S&M. — Tomica1111  &bull;  Question Existing?  17:08, 5 January 2012 (UTC)

Lol, well that's what it looked like to me! Especially when I look at the third FAC. This is what I have mean't about you supporting S&M in the past. It's nice of you, but you should try and remain detached and look at the article without knowing I have edited it. And thanks. Calvin  &bull; Watch n'  Learn 17:10, 5 January 2012 (UTC)

Birthday Cake
You have the writers and producers so add that on your own.
 * Recording
 * Recorded at Radisson Blu Royal Hotel, Room 1306, Copenhagen, Denmark.

- (CK)Lakeshade  -  talk2me  - 00:45, 7 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Personnel
 * Vocal engineering and recording – Kuk Harrell, Marcos Tovar
 * Assistant vocal recording – Jennifer Rosales
 * Mixing – Kevin "KD" Davis
 * Assistant mixing - Calvin Bailiff
 * See User talk:Anthony Appleyard. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 12:54, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Do you want me to move You Da One/version 2 and Man Down/version 2 back to User:Calvin999/Sandbox4? Anthony Appleyard (talk) 13:05, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

Talk:Music of the Sun/GA1
I've reviewed the article and left notes on the talk page. I've put the nomination on hold for seven days to allow the issues to be addressed. Feel free to contact me on my talk page, here, or on the article talk page with any concerns, and let me know one of those places when the issues have been addressed. If I may suggest that you strike out, check mark, or otherwise mark the items I've detailed, that will make it possible for me to see what's been addressed, and you can keep track of what's been done and what still needs to be worked on. Note this review will be claimed as part of the 2012 Wikicup. Ealdgyth - Talk 19:24, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks :). Will do it now. Calvin  &bull; Watch  n'  Learn 19:32, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

Charts
Hey! I'm working in my sandbox for "Drunk On Love" and I'm looking up charts, but there's one that I can't seem to see. I saw that you placed the references for the US Bubbling Under Hot 100 so you must have an account? Could you please do me a big favour and check to see what spot DOL was, you'd be a lifesaver!--Jakeriederer (talk) 20:34, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Does Drunk on Love pass notability? Calvin  &bull; Watch  n'  Learn 20:37, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Yes its charted on multiple charts and has had over 10 reviews specifically written about it.--Jakeriederer (talk) 21:25, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
 * I was planning on writing an article for it. Use your sandbox first. Make sure it is good, I'll check it if you want. Calvin  &bull; Watch  n'  Learn 21:38, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

That be perfect! I've just gotta finish up a few things and when im done i'll letcha know :)?--Jakeriederer (talk) 21:53, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Drunk_On_Love_sandbox okay there it is! The only thing left is the stuff that I couldn't find.. A.K.A the liner notes !--Jakeriederer (talk) 23:52, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Hmm, there is quite a lot wrong with it, mainly prose and grammar. And I don't think there is enough information. Actually, the references are horrific, they are completely unformatted. Calvin  &bull; Watch  n'  Learn 00:01, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

Could you help me fix it?--Jakeriederer (talk) 00:04, 9 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Yahuh. I can't do it tonight though. It will take time, it virtually needs re-writing and expanding. Calvin  &bull; Watch  n'  Learn 00:12, 9 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Do you intend on nominating it to be a GA? Calvin  &bull; Watch  n'  Learn 00:16, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

Yeah exactly! Its like a big mound of clay, its all there, you just need to touch it up and mould it into something beautiful :) Thank you so much! This is the first article I've written from the ground up, so it really does mean a lot to me!--Jakeriederer (talk) 00:14, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

Declined speedy deletion
I declined your G6 CSD nomination for Drunk on Love (Rihanna song). That category of CSD nomination is for non-controversial maintainance, which does not apply in this circumstance. A more appropriate forum for discussion would be WP:AFD. Please do not attempt to bypass normal process and consensus.  Catfish  Jim  and the soapdish  16:05, 9 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Don't accuse me of "bypassing normal processes". Calvin  &bull; Watch  n'  Learn 16:06, 9 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Okay sorry. But I do stand by what I said. There is no point in asking people to revert if you insist on it staying. So asking people to revert when FAC is around the corner isn't exactly the best idea. Calvin  &bull; Watch  n'  Learn 19:22, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

STOP
Because of what you are doing, "Halo" will fail its FAC due to edit wars. Sop, I humbly ask you to stop. See you later. Jivesh 1205 (Talk) 19:19, 9 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Okay sorry. But I do stand by what I said. There is no point in asking people to revert if you insist on it staying. So asking people to revert when FAC is around the corner isn't exactly the best idea. Calvin  &bull; Watch  n'  Learn 19:24, 9 January 2012 (UTC)
 * I am human and I do err. Bye. Jivesh 1205 (Talk) 19:25, 9 January 2012 (UTC)
 * What? Calvin  &bull; Watch  n'  Learn 00:10, 10 January 2012 (UTC)

Song links
Calvin, I think understand why you de-linked these two songs (at least for the time being, anyway) - so, maybe later upon future single releases, a re-link would possibly be applicable. BTW, notice that I didn't link that "newly" created article in Book:Rihanna earlier today, you know why, because it wasn't done by you! Keep up the great work, Calvin, and please try and be a little more nice!!! Best, --Discographer (talk) 20:13, 9 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks, and thanks? Lol. Calvin  &bull; Watch  n'  Learn

Justin Bieber
Is there any wikiproject for Justin Bieber. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 116.202.167.6 (talk) 13:59, 10 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Loool. There is no need one for at all. Calvin  &bull; Watch  n'  Learn 14:16, 10 January 2012 (UTC)

Happy New Year
Thanks Calvin ! I wish you a happy new year too : love, money, family and health :)  ⁬⁬Πx  (discuter) 18:29, 11 January 2012 (UTC)

The cake is a lie
Just reviewed "Birthday Cake" at Template:Did you know nominations/Birthday Cake (song) and I have a couple of ALTs you may want to consider. As for the article reviews taking forever... Christine Hakim sat there for nearly a month, while the attached nomination First Love was reviewed in a week. Argh. Crisco 1492 (talk) 16:45, 12 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Perhaps indeed. I have almost 200 starting from April 2011, so about 50% of my archives are DYK templates. However, it helps that articles on Indonesia are in very poor shape generally. For example, one of the most important Indonesian poets, Chairil Anwar, had an 1154 character stub before I expanded it. Another, Amir Hamzah, didn't even have an article. Heck, almost half of the National Heroes are redlinks! Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:30, 12 January 2012 (UTC)

DYK nomination of SOS (Rihanna song)
Hello! Your submission of SOS (Rihanna song) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Ealdgyth - Talk 16:54, 12 January 2012 (UTC)

Re: hey
Did you see my other comments there? - Saulo  Talk to Me 22:28, 12 January 2012 (UTC)
 * You haven't ticked off the refs? Calvin  &bull; Watch  n'  Learn 22:30, 12 January 2012 (UTC)

Hello
Can you review this good article nomination? 71.142.222.218 (talk) 05:29, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
 * I'll do it later. Calvin  &bull; Watch  n'  Learn 13:03, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
 * The article was quickly failed, obviously! — Tomica1111  &bull;  Question Existing?  13:04, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Was it? I didn't check. Calvin  &bull; Watch  n'  Learn 13:05, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
 * I quick failed it. Jivesh 1205 (Talk) 13:11, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Hmm okay. Calvin  &bull; Watch  n'  Learn 13:13, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Ping. Jivesh 1205 (Talk) 18:14, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Pinged. Lol. Calvin  &bull; Watch  n'  Learn 18:19, 16 January 2012 (UTC)

Loud
When we gonna re-nominate it. I looked through it and its pretty good, we have done a great job, I still don't understand why WP failed it.— Tomica1111  &bull;  Question Existing?  14:36, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
 * No, some sections need copy-editing still and I think I saw some refs which need correcting. Calvin  &bull; Watch  n'  Learn 18:28, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Is it nominated at GOCE? — Tomica1111  &bull;  Question Existing?  18:31, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
 * No. There is no point doing that. I won't be c/e anytime soon anyway. Calvin  &bull; Watch  n'  Learn 18:33, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Why there is no point? I didn't ask from you to do the c/e, simply we need some very good user to c/e the article. I will search for someone who can do that. — Tomica1111  &bull;  Question Existing?  18:34, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
 * That's not what I said? I said there is no point listing it for GOCE because it will probably take ages to get a copy-editor. To be honest, I think that certain editors, myself included, are becoming to reliant on getting copy-editors to re-write things. It doesn't always get you anywhere. For each of S&M's FACs, a different person, or even people, have gone through the article, yet there are still concerns with the prose. So it's down to personal preference if you think someone has done a good job or not. Calvin  &bull; Watch  n'  Learn 18:39, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
 * I re-nominated it. The references are improved, the prose also, User:Accedie c/e and said that the article looks pretty good. If someone quick fails... I am sure there is some policy where it can be discussed. I mean, have you seen how bad article are nominated for GA? Loud is masterpiece for them. — Tomica1111  &bull;  Question Existing?  11:47, 16 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Can I use some of your sandboxes for the S&M release history links? — Tomica1111  &bull;  Question Existing?  22:15, 19 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Yep, use number 15 :). Aaron  &bull; You  Da  One 22:19, 19 January 2012 (UTC)
 * I'm done ;) ! — Tomica1111  &bull;  Question Existing?  22:55, 19 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks, I replied on the sandbox lol. Aaron  &bull; You  Da  One 22:58, 19 January 2012 (UTC)

Re:Hey
Mlpearc  powwow  22:53, 14 January 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Birthday Cake (song)
Casliber (talk · contribs) 00:03, 15 January 2012 (UTC)

You Don't Love Me (No, No, No)
Not sure why you tagged it A3 - it's a good length stub. Possibly notable, possibly not - I'm not an enthusiast for articles about every **** single, so I won't comment on this one more... Peridon (talk) 19:20, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Only two sources, one of which is not reliable. I don't see how a stub can be a "good length" lol. Calvin  &bull; Watch  n'  Learn 13:28, 16 January 2012 (UTC)

WikiCup/History/2012/Submissions/Jivesh boodhun
Hey- you were right that the GA review was not eligible, but you shouldn't have removed it yourself- instead, you should have contacted one of the judges. It saves the sort of fratching that occurred on that particular submission page, and stops a bad atmosphere being fostered. Rest assured that Ed and I are checking through every submission at this stage in the competition, and so it would have been caught. As I say, though, if you're worried, contacting one of the judges would be the best move. Thanks, J Milburn (talk) 22:06, 15 January 2012 (UTC)

Cockiness (Love It)
Hello Calvin! I'm dropping by here to congratulate you on your awesome work in expanding the article for Cockiness (Love It). Kudos! Yours faithfully, Kotak  kasut. 03:30, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Wow, thanks! Calvin  &bull; Watch  n'  Learn 13:14, 16 January 2012 (UTC)

Re:HI
Yes, provided that significant work has been done on the article during 2012. So, let's say that you worked on an article all through December and got it to 10kb, then expanded it through January to 15kb before nominating it today, you would be able to claim points if/when it passes GAC. Thanks, J Milburn (talk) 17:48, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
 * That's a hell of an article. Looking at your edits to the article this year, I do not think that it could be accepted if it passed this time, as your changes have been small. If it failed, and you subsequently worked on the article based on the suggestions of the reviewer and then successfully renominated, then so be it, but please don't try to do that, as gaming the system with a double-point article could cause some real upset. However, I would be open to the notion of you taking it to FAC and claiming the points- provided you continue to work on the article during the GAC and subsequently, in preparation for the FAC. As this would be worth double, that's a whopping 200 points. Either way, best of luck; I can tell a lot of love has gone into that article. J Milburn (talk) 18:20, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Replied on my talk page. J Milburn (talk) 21:46, 16 January 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification
Hi. When you recently edited S&M (song), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page S&M (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:08, 19 January 2012 (UTC)

Adivce
Hi. You have an FAC going on and so it's not right time to change your signature. Take care. Jivesh 1205 (Talk) 05:29, 20 January 2012 (UTC)
 * I'm there. Jivesh 1205 (Talk) 17:12, 20 January 2012 (UTC)
 * So am I. Aaron  &bull; You  Da  One 17:15, 20 January 2012 (UTC)

46.64.21.150
I saw what this IP did. Just wanted to let you know that its a sock of banned user. Don't take any shit from that piece of crap. — Legolas ( talk 2 me ) 04:26, 21 January 2012 (UTC)
 * What are you talking about? Aaron  &bull; You  Da  One 11:51, 21 January 2012 (UTC)
 * See the person's contributions and foul-mouth. Makes that CharlieJS look like a little angel. — Legolas ( talk 2 me ) 14:47, 21 January 2012 (UTC)
 * No silly, in general. Calling other artist's like Rihanna, Perry, Madonna as sluts, name-calling, edit warring etc etc. Got that person blocked indefinitely for it. — <i style="color:blue;">Legolas</i> ( talk 2 me ) 14:54, 21 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Lol, yeah, I noticed that later. Silly me. :) — <i style="color:blue;">Legolas</i> ( talk 2 me ) 14:59, 21 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Not annoyed, I was kinda expecting it. The song really got lost in the shuffle. I shudder to think what would have happened if they released it as the first single. This is Gaga's first true flop. — <i style="color:blue;">Legolas</i> ( talk 2 me ) 15:07, 21 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Me too. That EMA performance really blew me away. Especially the ending of the performance with the hair flapping. — <i style="color:blue;">Legolas</i> ( talk 2 me ) 15:16, 21 January 2012 (UTC)
 * God, that was so bizarre with the corpse thing. — <i style="color:blue;">Legolas</i> ( talk 2 me ) 15:22, 21 January 2012 (UTC)
 * I stay away from anything related to Perez and I absolutely hate the fact that Gaga's friend with that asshole. — <i style="color:blue;">Legolas</i> ( talk 2 me ) 15:28, 21 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Ugh, thank god I didn't waste any time on that. Also, Madonna's coming back so Gaga's kinda taking a little backseat for now. Wonder if she'll perform at the Grammy's though. — <i style="color:blue;">Legolas</i> ( talk 2 me ) 15:32, 21 January 2012 (UTC)
 * No no, I meant that Gaga is bidding her time that after the attention is removed from Madonna, she will again surface. — <i style="color:blue;">Legolas</i> ( talk 2 me ) 16:39, 21 January 2012 (UTC)

Re: Hey
Hey, I've been pretty good. Been pretty busy with school and shit. Final exams start next week... AH! How have you been? — Status  &#x7B;<sup style="margin-left:0.37ex;">talk <sub style="margin-left:-3ex;">contribs  06:17, 22 January 2012 (UTC)

Digital sheet music
Hi :) I was wondering how you find the digital sheet music for songs online? I have been looking everywhere for the one of About a Girl but still no luck. Till I Go Home (talk) 09:38, 23 January 2012 (UTC)
 * The Sugababes song? There isn't one for that song, I just looked. Aaron  &bull; You  Da  One 18:18, 23 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks for checking, then is it impossible to find out the beats per minute and what key it's composed in etc. ? Till I Go Home (talk) 04:27, 27 January 2012 (UTC)

Hello
Can you cast your eyes over S&M again please? Aaron  &bull; You Da  One 23:19, 22 January 2012 (UTC)
 * I have to say, I'm really impressed with the article. You have done a wonderful job. I'm not sure its going to pass now, with so many oppose votes. Let's see if they respond. I copy-edited a few areas, but don't have time to do everything. But, I'll say this: with a few similar tweaks, you have my full support! Oran e   (talk)  01:39, 23 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Calvin, I've never helped anyone out on Wikipedia just to have them show me gratitude. But to be honest, if I go out of my way to copyedit your article, I do expect a thank you. And, even if you don't say it, I expect that you won't take all the credit for the rewrite and say that you did it, as you did here. Jivesh said to you, "I see you have re-written it." And your response to him was "Yep". This bothers me. Even if it was only a few sentences. Oran e   (talk)  19:44, 23 January 2012 (UTC)

S&M FAC
Hey Calvin, I just saw that Sandy failed the nomination. But don't get too worked up on it, I am almost certain that it will pass at the next nomination for sure. Even Sandy stated it on the FAC. I hope this note of encouragement will help you strive to get the article to FAC, I know you can do it! Best, Jona yo!  Selena 4 ever  19:50, 23 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks. I'm moving away from S&M for a while though, maybe in late February/early March I will take it back, but not for several weeks. Aaron  &bull; You  Da  One 19:54, 23 January 2012 (UTC)

Question
Calvin, are you interpreting the lyrics by yourself? I mean you are explaining them after quoting the lyrics and most of the sources do not support your POV. Lyrical interpretation surely means interpreting the lyrics but only if you have sources doing that for you. Jivesh 1205 (Talk) 08:58, 25 January 2012 (UTC)
 * No Jivesh, that is what the reviewer said. The wrote an entire paragraph just on Stupid in Love. Aaron  &bull; You  Da  One 13:36, 25 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Calvin. I assure you that I checked the other sources. They contain the lyrics only. I can paste the source and the prose in it separately if you want. There is one which is good, nevertheless, you went really into details to the point of putting your POV (i think). Jivesh 1205  (Talk) 15:45, 25 January 2012 (UTC)


 * as Rihanna insists she is not the person who her boyfriend projects her to be, making the singer feel as though she is worthless.
 * the singer begins to realize that she is worth more than how she is treated by her boyfriend, and starts to question how she is spoken to.
 * as she implies that she is the one who made the most effort in the relationship but is unappreciated by her boyfriend.

None of these are supported by the sources. They only quote lyrics, so this leads to the conclusion they are your interpretation(s). I am not telling you that your interpretations are bad... but they are not sourced --> WP:OR / WP:SYN. And be careful on the words you use. For instance, represents the moment of realization whereby Rihanna knows that she is too good for her boyfriend. Jivesh 1205 (Talk) 16:07, 25 January 2012 (UTC)
 * OKay. How did you make the infobox template for IASF and 4? Loud needs one. Aaron  &bull; You  Da  One 18:24, 25 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Did you pay attention to what I wrote? I mean, did you really do so? Actually, I don't know about the template Calvin. Try to see the history to know who created them. I cannot tell you for sure. Jivesh 1205 (Talk) 18:31, 25 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Yeah I did read it and I acted upon it. Aaron  &bull; You  Da  One 18:32, 25 January 2012 (UTC)
 * The template would be deleted. The same happened with 4 and IASF. There is no need for those templates. —  Tomica    (talk)  18:34, 25 January 2012 (UTC)
 * That's not the template I am talking about Tomica. I'm talking about the infobox ones, which are still very much there. Aaron  &bull; You  Da  One 18:35, 25 January 2012 (UTC)
 * That's good Calvin. Hmm, seems like we will soon have another singer having that type of template in her articles after Beyonce. :P Jivesh 1205 (Talk) 18:36, 25 January 2012 (UTC)

Madonna
Sorry, I just saw today that I forgot to answer your question. Yes, I saw her at The Graham Norton Show, and she was so so funny. Especially the part about scolding her children and that Hungarian interview. — <i style="color:blue;">Legolas</i> ( talk 2 me ) 12:55, 25 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Haha, yes she came off like that. It's a known fact that Madonna has always been very very caustic in her public appearances, I did not expect this one to be too different. I loved the scenario, when D'Arcy says, "tell us about your book Slut!" LMAO — <i style="color:blue;">Legolas</i> ( talk 2 me ) 13:38, 25 January 2012 (UTC)

Re. H.A.T.E.U
These are important releases that should be listed here. Why are you deleting them? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Danielmatsumoto (talk • contribs) 19:37, 25 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Because you are adding unsourced information, and the section title is wrong. Aaron  &bull; You  Da  One 19:39, 25 January 2012 (UTC)

BHG
What's the point of this? —  Andrew s talk  20:08, 25 January 2012 (UTC)
 * They are templates. Aaron  &bull; You  Da  One 20:09, 25 January 2012 (UTC)

New Good Article Nominee
Please review this new good article nomination. 206.15.252.30 (talk) 21:49, 26 January 2012 (UTC)

Comments
Hey :-) When you aren't busy, can you please leave comments here? Thanks, Jona yo!  Selena 4 ever  21:24, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Hey, I don't think I am qualified enough to comment on an FLC. Aaron  &bull; You  Da  One 21:28, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
 * I don't think there is a "qualification requirement" lolz but you don't have to if you don't want to :-) Best, Jona yo!  Selena 4 ever  21:32, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
 * I don't know if I would be the best out reviewing an FLC lol. When I have my own one I would feel more confident doing it. Aaron  &bull; You  Da  One 21:34, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Okay, well have a great day :-) Best, Jona yo!  Selena 4 ever  21:39, 26 January 2012 (UTC)

New GAN
Can you review this new good article nomination, please? 206.15.252.30 (talk) 22:15, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
 * You already requested that Calvin should review your article. Please be patient as GAN reviews usually takes months before someone is willing to review it. Best, Jona yo!  Selena 4 ever  22:23, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Actually, the nominator has not made any significant contributions to the article nor has s/he notified the significant contributors. I'd decline. — WP: PENGUIN  · [ TALK ]  22:25, 26 January 2012 (UTC)

R U here
? —  Tomica    (talk)  22:54, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Yesssss :). Aaron  &bull; You  Da  One 22:56, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
 * I need a tiny c/e favor! :) I will request you in three minutes. —  Tomica    (talk)  22:59, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
 * This is my problem! I am so bad at writing synopsis! —  Tomica    (talk)  23:09, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
 * I've done a c/e of what you have already. To be honest, it could be expanded. Aaron  &bull; You  Da  One 23:20, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Feel free to do it If you can. I don't have the inspiration, since the whole video is just kidding of dancing :) ! —  Tomica    (talk)  23:23, 26 January 2012 (UTC)

It Slays
I love this. It will slay urban and rhythmic radios. Jivesh 1205 (Talk) 07:47, 27 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Lol, Jivesh, that video was uploaded on December 24 2011. Didn't you notice that there are no new lyrics and that the person who made the video altered the level of the fade when she says "I wanna fuck you right now"? Plus, the order in which lyrics occur are wrong from the original. This is just a fan made extended version of the original 1:18 version. Aaron  &bull; You  Da  One 12:07, 27 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Anyway, it slays. Jivesh 1205 (Talk) 12:10, 27 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Lol I can't believe you thought that was the full version! I just googled Birthday Cake and there is nothing. If she had released it, it would be on google news. Aaron  &bull; You  Da  One 12:12, 27 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Cake cake cake cake. And he wants to lick the icing. :P Jivesh 1205 (Talk) 12:13, 27 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Rihanna's new tattoo is awful. Aaron  &bull; You  Da  One 12:18, 27 January 2012 (UTC)
 * You mean horrible? Jivesh 1205 (Talk) 12:20, 27 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Same thing Jivesh. Aaron  &bull; You  Da  One 12:22, 27 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Lol, I asked because I was not sure. And you saw how she was holding that man? Was she drunk or what? Jivesh 1205 (Talk) 12:24, 27 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Know you know :). But yeah I don't like her new tattoo on her knuckles. Google it. And holding who?? Aaron  &bull; You  Da  One 12:25, 27 January 2012 (UTC)
 * See. Jivesh 1205 (Talk) 12:27, 27 January 2012 (UTC)

If you have Jay-Z's "The Blueprint 3" or have the credits to "Run This Town", please write here!
Thankssss. Aaron  &bull; You Da  One 19:41, 27 January 2012 (UTC)

"Breakin' Dishes"
Aaron, my friend, this absolutely needs another look at. The song, God forbid, which does not say much for itself, and was de-regulated to a "song" from a promotional single by another user, was indeed a promotiomal-released single; though I absolutely cannot show anything "verifying" this, was released as is, with both identical A and B-side showings. Please take this into consideration, and let me know what you think. Promotional single restoration is immenent! Thanks! --Discographer (talk) 19:58, 27 January 2012 (UTC)
 * I remember not being able to find any sources saying it was a promo single. Though I'm pretty sure it was. Aaron  &bull; You  Da  One 20:03, 27 January 2012 (UTC)

Re:hi
Yep, that's fine, provided you did some work on them this year. J Milburn (talk) 15:55, 28 January 2012 (UTC)

Hey
Do not get wrong, but I was about to get started on "If I Never See Your Face Again". There was an under construction template, that was removed by bot, because Ben came on my talk page and asked about help on "DSTM". —  Tomica    (talk)  21:45, 28 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Oh, well I've planned on doing it for a while. It's in my list. Aaron  &bull; You  Da  One 21:53, 28 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Well sorry I didn't saw your list. But you for sure saw the under construction template on the article. I mean, how much better I am with you, I don't get anything from that. —  Tomica    (talk)  21:54, 28 January 2012 (UTC)
 * I never saw an under construction template Tomica. If I saw you had put one there, I wouldn't have touched it. Aaron  &bull; You  Da  One 21:57, 28 January 2012 (UTC)
 * You wanted to work on it and was on your list, but didn't had it on the watchlist. Mmmm weird. —  Tomica    (talk)  22:03, 28 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Yeah it's on my watchlist, but so are over 560 other articles. I don't scan each article every time a log on. I just looked at the articles history. Don't take this the wrong way, but you put an under construction banner on the article on January 13, then a bot removed it on January 23. You, or anyone else for that matter, didn't make an edit between Jan 13 and Jan 23, and no on else had until I did just now, so you made no conscious effort to start working on it, so it is quite easy for you to say that you were just about to start working on it. I'm not arguing, I'm just stating the obvious. Aaron  &bull; You  Da  One 22:08, 28 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Sure, you are stating the obvious as always. I already explained what was the reason why I didn't start for it, though I searched for sources that are now in my sandbox. —  Tomica    (talk)  01:22, 29 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Well, can't you see where I'm coming from? Okay you didn't start it because of DSTM, but I didn't know that. You didn't start editing the article and I didn't know you had plans to. Aaron  &bull; You  Da  One 01:45, 29 January 2012 (UTC)

You guys really shouldn't fight over who gets to edit what article... It looks quite pathetic if I'm being honest with you. Just have fun and edit you guys. Don't make everything so serious. — Status  &#x7B;<sup style="margin-left:0.37ex;">talk <sub style="margin-left:-3ex;">contribs  04:37, 29 January 2012 (UTC)


 * I am not siding anyone here but Aaron, you should "scan each article every time a log on" on your watch-list when you log in. I have more than you. Yet I do it everyday. I don't think it's a big deal. If you really want to work on some article or care for it, it is natural that you are expected to take a look at it if someone (apart from you) edited it. Jivesh 1205 (Talk) 05:27, 29 January 2012 (UTC)
 * To be honest guys, it wouldn't have mattered what my reply had of been, you would have still thought I was in the wrong anyway, as most people always do. Aaron  &bull; You  Da  One 12:29, 29 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Oh come on Aaron, what's this new drama now? I told you I am not blaming anyone. Just that it's so weird that you did not check the article's history before starting to work on it. Jivesh 1205 (Talk) 12:31, 29 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Even if I did, no one had edited for 15 days Jivesh, surely you would think the same as me and think no one was intending to edit it. Two weeks is quite a long time not a single person to edit an article. Come online. Aaron  &bull; You  Da  One 12:33, 29 January 2012 (UTC)
 * So what if the template was removed? I already explained to you, that there was reason for its removal. I got the article on "stand by", because Ben came to my talk page asking to help him with "Don't Stop the Music", but since he 'disappeared' and you can barely see these days on Wikipedia, I took nearly all the job from the article. You could ask me about If I intended to work on the article. I really don't found fair this way of sneaking around, finding 53454 sources and beginning a fast expansion. —  Tomica    (talk)  12:42, 29 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Yeah you explained to me yesterday after I had started editing. I can't read minds Tomica, how would I have known if you had intentions for editing. With regard to putting sources on the talk page, I've done it for a lot of articles before now. This is not the first time. Aaron  &bull; You  Da  One 12:49, 29 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Exactly, you don't read minds, but instead you read you watchlist. I am 90% sure you saw the adding of the template. Its impossible, the article has pretty much long name, + there are not so much edits on me, so probably it was weird that something happened with it. —  Tomica    (talk)  12:52, 29 January 2012 (UTC)
 * You may be 90% sure, but you are 100% wrong. I'm sorry I didn't see you make one edit on the article over two weeks ago. Enough now. Aaron  &bull; You  Da  One 13:00, 29 January 2012 (UTC)

THIS IS A HOT MESS. So please, stop it both of you. Aaron, next time please check an article's history before working on it. And Tom, you go right now to your page and make a list of all the articles on which you will work. I know Calvin told you not to work on the TTT ones. But you can still work on the others though I know IINSYFA is also a non-TTT song. But to prevent further argument, let Aaron do it for this time. I know you are very comprehensive Tom. Jivesh 1205 (Talk) 13:07, 29 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Sorry Jivesh that's not true. Me and Tomica agreed that I would edit the first two singles and he would do the second two singles. I never said he is not allowed to edit any of them. Aaron  &bull; You  Da  One 13:10, 29 January 2012 (UTC)
 * I am genuinely sorry for my misinterpretation then. Jivesh 1205 (Talk) 13:25, 29 January 2012 (UTC)

Re: Hey
Sorry, I was on a vacation! I left a few messages in the GA review before, but I didn't see if you replied them or not... I'm going to fix the references.- Saulo  Talk to Me 00:53, 29 January 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification
Hi. When you recently edited If I Never See Your Face Again, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page James Valentine (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:43, 29 January 2012 (UTC)

Rihanna's Cheers (Drink To That)
I provided a reference for my edit, why did you change it?
 * Look here. Aaron  &bull; You  Da  One 18:55, 29 January 2012 (UTC)
 * LP co-wrote the song, why would she lie about something so publicly? Jamie60509 (talk) 19:00, 29 January 2012 (UTC)
 * It's not that she is lying, it's the source you provided. We don't use Twitter on Wikipedia as a means of information. Aaron  &bull; You  Da  One 19:03, 29 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Oh OK. I didn't know that, I assumed that info from someone so involved with the song would be acceptable.  I'll have to see if I can find a source that isn't from Twitter etc. Jamie60509 (talk) 19:07, 29 January 2012 (UTC)
 * I wrote it in my edit summary when I reverted you the first time, then you reverted me. So you ignored what I said. Aaron  &bull; You  Da  One 19:09, 29 January 2012 (UTC)