User talk:CalvinTanWY

August 2018
Hello, I'm Gab4gab. I noticed that you made one or more changes to an article, Chung Ling (Private) High School, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Gab4gab (talk) 15:52, 25 August 2018 (UTC)

Welcome!
Hello, CalvinTanWY, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Chung Ling (Private) High School have not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and has been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or in other media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles. Additionally, all new biographies of living people must contain at least one reliable source.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or. Again, welcome. Roxy, the dog. barcus 16:12, 25 August 2018 (UTC)

August 2018
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Chung Ling (Private) High School. Roxy, the dog. barcus 16:13, 25 August 2018 (UTC)


 * If the source is from the schools magazine then you need to cite it in the article to allow the reader to verify the content. Of course you would already know that if you had visited the referencing for beginners tutorial before adding the content again with no references. There is no urgent need for you to add the material. Take the time to read how to reference and then cite your source(s) when you add the new material. If you have any questions about how to proceed you may want to visit the Teahouuse where editors can as questions about editing Wikipedia or ask me on my talk page. It is your responsibility when restoring challenged material to provide citations to sources at the time you restore it. (See WP:BURDEN) You have not been doing this so I warn you not to restore it again until you provide the necessary citations. Gab4gab (talk) 16:19, 25 August 2018 (UTC)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Chung Ling (Private) High School. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing Wikipedia. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. Gab4gab (talk) 16:40, 25 August 2018 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. S warm  ♠  08:41, 26 August 2018 (UTC)