User talk:Calvinadler

Nomination of Gil Lederman for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gil Lederman is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Gil Lederman until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. -- haminoon  ( talk ) 10:13, 25 March 2015 (UTC)

March 2015
Hello, I'm Kharkiv07. I noticed that you recently removed all content from Gil Lederman with this edit without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, I restored the page's content. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks.  Kharkiv07 Talk  13:21, 25 March 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Gil Lederman


The article Gil Lederman has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. Joseph2302 (talk) 13:22, 25 March 2015 (UTC)

Your request to delete this page
Hello! You posted a request to have this talk page deleted. Wikipedia policy does not usually allow for deletion of user talk pages. See WP:OWNTALK. You can certainly edit out material from the page, or even blank the page if you want, but there has to be a good reason before we can actually delete the page. If you really want it deleted, you can explain why using the template and putting your reason after "rationale=". --MelanieN (talk) 16:18, 25 March 2015 (UTC)

Gil Lederman
Hello! You have tried, twice now, to get the article Gil Lederman speedy-deleted, using a G7 tag, "deletion requested by only editor". That tag cannot be used on this article, because you are not the only editor; other people have contributed to the article. However, there is a discussion at Articles for deletion/Gil Lederman about whether the article should be kept or deleted, and you are welcome to comment at that discussion and explain why you think it should be deleted. --MelanieN (talk) 14:31, 26 March 2015 (UTC)

March 2015
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Gil Lederman, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. -- haminoon  ( talk ) 06:42, 27 March 2015 (UTC)

Stop removing information from the article. If you continue you will be blocked from editing. -- GB fan 12:20, 30 March 2015 (UTC)


 * Your actions at Gil Lederman are getting to be very disruptive. Your removal of content and tagging for deletion has got to stop.  There is only one way this article is going to be deleted and that is for the discussion at Articles for deletion/Gil Lederman to come to a consensus that the article should be deleted.  You can join in the discussion at that page and explain why you think the article should be deleted.  Do not tag it with any other deletion rationale or remove content again.  If you do you will be blocked from editing.  -- GB fan 16:06, 30 March 2015 (UTC)