User talk:Calvinryan

Robbins Theory of Concept and Matter
Calvin Robbins and Ryan Ierardi 5/31/2010

'Robbins Theory of Concept and Matter'©

This article is about the concept of existance, and the existance of concept.

"Matter and existance are the same, in that a concept does not have to be related to matter, and matter does not need to be related to any sort of concept. You can have something, and not have any adjectives to describe it, therefore that matter is just matter without concept. Meanwhile, if you have absolutly nothing, you can describe it, and therefore making it exist. Existance is mearly a concept, and a concept is the definition of existance. so, if you can take something, anything at all, and describe it, that makes it exist. And if you have matter you cannot describe, than it still exists, but is not related to concept. Matter can also exist, along with concept. A red rock exists in matter, and can be described in concept. Meanwhile, something living can be described as an object in matter, but you can describe it as living, and living is a concept. If nothing existed, you could describe that nothingness as nothingness, which is a concept that is tangible to the human mind. however, if you were not there to comprehend the existance of this nothingness, then it would be nothing. It would not exist, and have no concept related towards it. Similarly, if you were not around to see something, and describe it, then it wouldnt exist in concept, but would exist in matter."-Calvin J. Robbins ©

Speedy deletion nomination of Robbins theory of Concept and Matter
A tag has been placed on Robbins theory of Concept and Matter, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Moocha (talk) 20:20, 31 May 2010 (UTC)

May 2010
Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Jminthorne (talk) 20:24, 31 May 2010 (UTC)