User talk:Caly123

Welcome!

 * }

September 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page BBC One 'Circle' idents has been reverted. Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. I removed the following link(s): http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xLI5j4xh65Q&feature=related. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. a sound or video file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy and therefore probably should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 18:19, 3 September 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of S4C 2009 Idents
A tag has been placed on S4C 2009 Idents requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Eeekster (talk) 09:58, 4 September 2010 (UTC)

Sorry about that!
I've declined the speedy deletion on S4C 2009 Idents. Feel free to expand it more. Sorry about that! NativeForeigner Talk/Contribs 17:02, 4 September 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Romuald the Reindeer


The article Romuald the Reindeer has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Does not appear to be notable

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jimmy Pitt  talk  14:14, 20 December 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Little Lodgers


The article Little Lodgers has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * No evidence of notability per Wikipedia's criteria.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ... disco spinster   talk  17:19, 27 May 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Baby Jake


The article Baby Jake has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Unsourced. Virtually no context.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sum mer PhD (talk) 21:09, 23 July 2011 (UTC)

March 2015
Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to List of ChuckleVision episodes. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you.  Super Mario  Man  ( talk ) 18:21, 28 March 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:28, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

WP:BRD
Hi there, your edit here is disruptive. Per WP:BRD, when another editor (such as myself) reverts a change that you've made, the onus is on you to seek consensus for inclusion via discussion on the article's talk page. Resubmitting without addressing the user's concern or achieving consensus is disruptive and is the fast-track to being blocked. This is an article about Boomerang, not an article about Cartoonito. Shows get moved around all the time, and we shouldn't be focusing on things that aren't related to the subject. Noting that a show has been moved is of no long-term encyclopedic value. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 19:48, 30 December 2015 (UTC)

December 2015
Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at Boomerang (UK & Ireland). Your edits have been or will be reverted or removed. Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. Diff:  Cyphoidbomb (talk) 19:55, 30 December 2015 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

March 2016
Hello, I'm Dcirovic. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to 2016 Kids' Choice Awards has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Dcirovic (talk) 19:04, 3 March 2016 (UTC)

Template:Infobox television
Hi there, these edits are not consistent with Template:Infobox television. We keep series as "present" unless 1) you provide a reliable source that indicates the series has been cancelled, or 2) you wait 12 months after the series last released an episode, and use the literal date the series last aired. Your change to "2015" doesn't meet any of these criteria. Please stop changing it. Thanks. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 23:08, 8 July 2016 (UTC)

Reference errors on 4 November
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. as follows: Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/RBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/RBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=ReferenceBot%20–%20&section=new report it to my operator]. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:22, 5 November 2016 (UTC)
 * On the Boomerang (UK & Ireland) page, [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=747872841 your edit] caused a URL error (help) . ([ Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&preload=User:ReferenceBot/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20%5B%5BSpecial%3ADiff%2F747872841%7CBoomerang (UK & Ireland)%5D%5D Ask for help])

Sexual (song)
Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Sexual (song). Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Update the date of the chart, or please don't update chart positions. It really is not hard.  Ss 112  17:27, 9 December 2016 (UTC)

Touch (Little Mix song)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Touch (Little Mix song), you may be blocked from editing. I asked you two weeks ago to update accessdates, or to please not update chart positions, otherwise you are misleading people. Either start doing this, or you will be warned and then reported.  Ss 112  17:30, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

January 2017
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at List of programs broadcast by Discovery Family, you may be blocked from editing. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. AdamDeanHall (talk) 23:28, 5 January 2017 (UTC)