User talk:CamHanna

Euprepiophis conspicillatus
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Euprepiophis conspicillatus, and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: Elaphe conspicillata. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page&mdash; you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally moving or duplicating content, please be sure you have followed the procedure at Splitting by acknowledging the duplication of material in edit summary to preserve attribution history.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 10:51, 11 December 2009 (UTC)


 * Hello there! I don't know anything about snakes, so I can't comment on the validity of the new scientific name, but if this is correct, you do not need to copy the previous page like you did. You can just "move" the old page to the new name. Just click on the "move" button on the top navigation box (next to "edit page", "new section", etc.). Ruigeroeland (talk) 11:15, 11 December 2009 (UTC)

Good work
Your proof reading of the History of Africa is appreciated. Alatari (talk) 05:20, 14 May 2010 (UTC)