User talk:Cambalachero/Archive 6

Notice of Dispute resolution discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute in which you may have been involved. Content disputes can hold up article development, therefore we are requesting your participation to help find a resolution. The thread is "Juan Manuel de Rosas". {| style="border: 0; width: 100%;"
 * style="width: 50%; vertical-align: top;" |
 * style="width: 50%; vertical-align: top;" |

If you wish to open a DR/N filing, click the "Request dispute resolution" button below this guide or go to Dispute resolution noticeboard/request for an easy to follow, step by step request form.

What this noticeboard is:


 * It is an early step to resolve content disputes after talk page discussions have stalled. If it's something we can't help you with, or is too complex to resolve here, our volunteers will point you in the right direction.

What this noticeboard is not:


 * It is not a place to deal with the behavior of other editors. We deal with disputes about article content, not disputes about user conduct.
 * It is not a place to discuss disputes that are already under discussion at other dispute resolution forums.
 * It is not a substitute for the talk pages: the dispute must have been discussed extensively on a talk page (not just through edit summaries) before resorting to DRN.
 * It is not a court with judges or arbitrators that issue binding decisions: we focus on resolving disputes through consensus, compromise, and explanation of policy.

Things to remember:


 * Discussions should be civil, calm, concise, neutral, and objective. Comment only about the article's content, not the other editors.   Participants who go off-topic or become uncivil may be asked to leave the discussion.
 * Let the other editors know about the discussion by posting {{subst:drn-notice}} on their user talk page.
 * Sign and date your posts with four tildes " ".
 * If you ever need any help, ask one of our volunteers, who will help you as best as they can. You may also wish to read through the FAQ page located here and on the DR/N talkpage.

Please take a moment to review the simple guide and join the discussion. Thank you! EarwigBot  operator /  talk  20:21, 7 January 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for your review, now I have fulfilled the QPQ requirement, would you check again? (Detrás de Mi Ventana). Jaespinoza (talk) 20:53, 11 January 2013 (UTC)

Formal mediation has been requested

 * I request that you respond to the request for mediation when you are next online, or at least consider other steps of the dispute resolution process that you can take in order to resolve the disagreement concerning Juan Manuel de Rosas. As you know, editors of Wikipedia have a duty to engage in dispute resolution and consensus-building discussion when their edits are challenged. Your edits have been challenged. If there is anything I can do to assist you with responding to the mediation request, please let me know. Regards, AGK  [•] 15:56, 16 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Dear Cambalachero, while I cannot deter you from participating in Lecen's RfM, please take note of my response to kind AGK prior to making a decision. I firmly believe that Lecen, by this point, is simply WP:GAMING the system to get his way through one form or another. Regards.-- MarshalN20  | T al k 21:51, 16 January 2013 (UTC)

Greetings fellow "South American Nationalist"
Sorry couldn't resist, I was immensely amused, I may even create a userbox to commemorate the occasion. Regards, fellow conspirator. Wee Curry Monster talk 22:49, 16 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Just in case, Wee refers to this quote from our friend from Ipanema.-- MarshalN20  | T al k 23:13, 16 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Yes, I know, things like these happen from time to time. I reverted a vandalism once and got accused of being Kirchnerist, and another time someone thought that I was from the US Cambalachero (talk) 01:16, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
 * I did comment at DRN on his comments on Rosas. A literal translation of Caudillo into English is of course dictator but that doesn't reflect the range of opinion on Rosas.  Sorry I have not commented further as I don't wish to get into another confrontation with Lecen but if you have further issues please feel free to ask my opinion.  I know how it can feel to be alone in a confrontation with a disruptive single minded POV pusher and will gladly help if I can.  Wee Curry Monster talk 22:02, 17 January 2013 (UTC)

Caudillo democracy
Cambalachero, this source may prove useful in your mediated discussion with Lecen. The Life and Death of Democracy by John Keane (political theorist). Particularly important are pages 414 and 415, which demonstrate the controversial nature of Rosas as a "democratic caesar". Given that it's in English, and written by a well-known political theorist, it may help the mediator get a better understanding of the subject. Regards.-- MarshalN20 | T al k 01:42, 17 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Thank you; but I requested Lecen to avoid using user's talk pages to continue the discussion outside the special page for it. Needless to say, I shall proceed with the same policy I'm requesting him (I only made an exception for the previous one because it was basically unrelated). I hope you will understand, and thanks for your interest. Cambalachero (talk) 01:49, 17 January 2013 (UTC)


 * I understand. Please do tell me how everything ends up. All the best.-- MarshalN20 | T al k 01:53, 17 January 2013 (UTC)

DYK for Repatriation of Juan Manuel de Rosas's body
Casliber (talk · contribs) 01:17, 20 January 2013 (UTC)

Mediation for Juan Manuel de Rosas article
Hi Cambalachero, I'm going to be the mediator for the Juan Manuel de Rosas case. The mediation will be on Wikipedia talk:Requests for mediation/Juan Manuel de Rosas/Mediation. PhilKnight (talk) 11:42, 24 January 2013 (UTC)


 * I'm very busy in the real world right now. I will try to answer in the weekend. Cambalachero (talk) 16:41, 24 January 2013 (UTC)

Notification of discussion
A few months ago, you participated in a discussion on Wikipedia talk:Did you know about Gibraltar-related DYKs on the Main Page. I am proposing that the temporary restrictions on such DYKs, which were imposed in September 2012, should be lifted and have set out a case for doing so at Wikipedia talk:Did you know/Gibraltar-related DYKs. If you have a view on this, please comment at that page. Prioryman (talk) 21:59, 13 February 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 14
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Marcelo Lascano, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page University of Madrid (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:48, 14 February 2013 (UTC)

DYK nomination of House of Tucumán
Hello! Your submission of House of Tucumán at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Chamal T •C 05:29, 21 February 2013 (UTC)

2011 Premios Fuse TV
Hi. As you're an active member of the Uruguay wikiproject, I hope you can help me with this. I've been working on List of awards and nominations received by Adele and I'm came across one section which claims she won two awards at the 2011 Premios Fuse TV, which is supposedly hosted by a TV channel in Montevideo called Fuse TV. However, I've been unable to find any reliable sources to confirm this award show (or this TV channel) even exist! Needless to say, I suspect this page is a hoax. What's your opinion - have you ever heard of these? Cheers, ★ Bald Zebra ★ talk 11:34, 27 February 2013 (UTC)

Greetings, I see that you have removed my contribution to the AMIA Bombing Wikipedia page. Apologies if this contravened the rules. I am somewhat new to this. I will re-enter a contribution without copy and paste of referenced document. Many Thanks Johnannes. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Johanne Johannes (talk • contribs) 17:36, 27 February 2013 (UTC)

DYK for Casa de Tucumán
Materialscientist (talk) 08:02, 28 February 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 4
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Decembrist revolution (Argentina) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added links pointing to William Brown and Battle of Cepeda


 * Juan Manuel de Rosas (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Francisco Ramírez

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:14, 4 March 2013 (UTC)

DYK for Decembrist revolution (Argentina)
Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:03, 7 March 2013 (UTC)

DYK for Gastón Soffritti
Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:04, 7 March 2013 (UTC)

Question
Did I offend any of your sensibilities with my comments on that talk page? I think your tone indicated that what you felt and wanted to say was more than you actually did say... In any case, I'm sorry for anything already. I often make dumb points here. Lguipontes (talk) 14:15, 15 March 2013 (UTC)

Uh, I think I already know by stalking your contributions. Well, just wanted to say I don't support any kind of dictatorship, possibility of governments not having transparency by censorship of its critics, and the likes. And I know well this has been an issue with countries with governments of left-wing tendencies in Latin America. Nevertheless, it doesn't make me less hostile against certain kinds of conglomerate, especially those with spurious biased viewpoints, data manipulation and support of political and economic elites (or political elites supporting them because they don't want to mess with fire). I wish everyone the best. Lguipontes (talk) 14:54, 15 March 2013 (UTC)

Arbcom notice
You are involved in a recently filed request for arbitration. Please review the request at Arbitration/Requests and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. Additionally, the following resources may be of use—
 * Arbitration/Requests;
 * Arbitration guide.

Thanks, --Lecen (talk) 10:10, 16 March 2013 (UTC)

highly umpopular regime?
Hi! Do you think fraud was commited in the last elections, or what? Regards! --Againme (talk) 15:58, 18 March 2013 (UTC)


 * No, she won the elections by pretending to be something she was not. After the victory, the mask was dropped, and the loss of popularity was quick. See 8N Cambalachero (talk) 16:19, 18 March 2013 (UTC)


 * Hi again! I'm reading Argentine general election, 2011. Don't you think that 45 per cent of the electorate is more than enough people to do the 8N demonstrations? The Governmanet doesn't need to have lost one voter... --Againme (talk) 19:31, 23 March 2013 (UTC)

Invitation for Mediation
You are invited to take part in a mediation regarding articles of your concern. The link is below: Thank you, --Lecen (talk) 11:12, 26 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Requests for mediation/Argentine history on Wikipedia

Arbitration case opened
An arbitration case involving you has been opened, and is located at Arbitration/Requests/Case/Argentine History. Evidence that you wish the Arbitrators to consider should be added to the evidence sub-page, at Arbitration/Requests/Case/Argentine History/Evidence. Please add your evidence by April 12, 2013, which is when the evidence phase closes. You can contribute to the case workshop sub-page, Arbitration/Requests/Case/Argentine History/Workshop. For a guide to the arbitration process, see Arbitration/Guide to arbitration. For the Arbitration Committee, — ΛΧΣ  21  22:07, 29 March 2013 (UTC) —  ΛΧΣ  21  22:07, 29 March 2013 (UTC)

March 2013
Thank you for your contributions. One of your recent contributions to Mario Poli has been reverted or removed, because it contains speculative or unconfirmed information about a future event. Please only add material about future events if it is verifiable, based on a reference to a reliable source. Thank you. Elizium23 (talk) 23:14, 29 March 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 31
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Graduados (Chile), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Upa (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 19:22, 31 March 2013 (UTC)

Evidence word count limit on Argentine History case
Hi Cambalachero, this message is to let you know that arbitrator has allowed an extension of the evidence word count in the following manner: An initial statement regarding the dispute (1000 words) and a second statement discussing reliability of the sources in detail (up to 2000 words). The second statement also has to comply with the following conditions:

Thanks, — ΛΧΣ  21  00:47, 2 April 2013 (UTC)

DYK for Graduados (Chile)
PanydThe muffin is not subtle 16:02, 3 April 2013 (UTC)

Buenos Aires Flood
I hope everything gets better soon.-- MarshalN20 | T al k 19:56, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Glad to hear you are alright. Luckily, I have never had to deal with floods. Severe thunderstorms and tornadoes are the problem here, but that has more to do with wind speed and electricity rather than water (the water is actually what is in constant scarcity). Best wishes.-- MarshalN20 | T al k 20:50, 7 April 2013 (UTC)

DYK for Mario Poli
PanydThe muffin is not subtle 16:18, 4 April 2013 (UTC)

No mention of leftwing urban & rural guerrilla warfare although attributed sources clearly make mention of the fact
Unfortunately I've been recently accused of historical revisionism. This is what Wee Curry Monster, formerly known as Justin A Kuntz (see http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Justin_A_Kuntz&action=history) has written after removing my edits in the intro page:

''Wikipedia isn't a platform for rewriting history as you seem to think, we're an encyclopedia. The text was perfectly neutral till you came along. There are plenty of fair minded wikipedians around and yes they will fix POV editing like yours.''

I would again like to point out that in the past this chap tried to remove any reference to leftwing terrorism. The sources included in the introductory paragraph of the Dirty War page, talk about the armed militancy of the ERP, Montoneros & other left wing guerrilla groups. These sources are not mentioning the activities of the right wing death squads and units of the Argentinian military & police which are already mentioned at the start of the intro when State Terrorism & Operation Condor is mentioned as being part of the Dirty War in Argentina. It looks like JUSTIN A KUNTZ (now reinvented as WEE CURRY MONSTER) is bent on denying the fact the Communist guerrillas of that period had taken up arms several years before the military coup of 1976. I hope you can help, because honestly I'm very frustrated with the whitewashing of history carried out by WEE CURRY MONSTER. I also believe that any mention of the current Pope is irrelevant in the introduction of the page.--SIUHM (talk) 01:14, 7 April 2013 (UTC)

Proof that WEE CURRY MONSTER (when he was known as JUSTIN A KUNTZ) is trying to cover up the crimes of the Argentinian leftwing guerrillas:

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Dirty_War&diff=307321855&oldid=307321031

--SIUHM (talk) 01:21, 7 April 2013 (UTC)

Your Arbitration evidence is too long
Hello, Cambalachero. Thank you for your recent submission of evidence for the Argentine History Arbitration case. As you may be aware, the Arbitration Committee asks that users submitting evidence in cases adhere to limits regarding the length of their submissions. These limits, currently at 1000 words and 100 diffs for parties and 500 words and 50 diffs for all others, are in place to ensure that the Arbitration Committee receives only the most important information relevant to the case, and is able to determine an appropriate course of action in a reasonable amount of time. The evidence you have submitted currently exceeds at least one of these limits, and is presently at 1304 words and 2 diffs. Please try to reduce the length of your submission to fit within these limits; this guide may be able to provide some help in doing so. If the length of your evidence is not reduced soon, it may be refactored or removed by a human clerk within a few days. Thank you! If you have any questions or concerns regarding the case, please contact the drafting Arbitrator or case clerk (who are listed on the case pages); if you have any questions or concerns about this bot, please contact the operator. On behalf of the Arbitration Committee, Hers fold ArbClerkBOT(talk) 18:04, 12 April 2013 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Brazilian nationalism
Hello! Your submission of Brazilian nationalism at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! – Muboshgu (talk) 20:55, 12 April 2013 (UTC)

DYK for Daniel Ortúzar
Hi! I have responded to your comment at the DYK nomination page. Lester Foster (talk &#124; talk) 02:55, 15 April 2013 (UTC)

Incomplete DYK nomination
Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/Puerta de Hierro, el exilio de Perón at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; see step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with db-g7, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 08:58, 16 April 2013 (UTC)

War of the Triple Alliance, Astynax
Dear Cambalachero, Astynax is at it again, replacing all links that lead to War of the Triple Alliance to the term "Paraguayan War". I think you were involved in a prior discussion regarding this situation. I lack the time to discuss this with Astynax or report it at AN/I; if you have some time, it would be good to look into this. Regards.-- MarshalN20 | T al k 13:40, 17 April 2013 (UTC)


 * Wouldn't that overlap with the ongoing arbitration? Cambalachero (talk) 17:48, 17 April 2013 (UTC)


 * The arbitration case is between us and Lecen. Astynax is an outside voice to the case, so presenting a case at AN/I would be acceptable. I will write up the case and provide a link to you as well as to Astynax.-- MarshalN20 | T al k 19:54, 17 April 2013 (UTC)


 * Here it is . Regards.-- MarshalN20 | T al k 20:16, 17 April 2013 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Brazilian nationalism
Hello! Your submission of Brazilian nationalism at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know!  —♦♦ AMBER  (ЯʘCK)  12:25, 22 April 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 23
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 18A, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Córdoba Province and Río Cuarto (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:54, 23 April 2013 (UTC)

DYK for Puerta de Hierro, el exilio de Perón
Casliber (talk · contribs) 16:03, 2 May 2013 (UTC)

TFA nomination
Hello there. For the May 25 TFA nomination I was initially going to nominate Heinrich Bar for that position, but I see that you've taken up my slot. Is it possible that we can move the date of the May Revolution to an earlier one? I understand that it occurred throughout the week and not just on May 25. Minima ©  ( talk )

Disambiguation link notification for May 7
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Juan Bautista Alberdi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Carlos Tejedor (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:14, 7 May 2013 (UTC)

DYK for Horacio Cartes
The DYK project (nominate) 08:02, 9 May 2013 (UTC)

DYK for 18A
The DYK project (nominate) 16:03, 10 May 2013 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Marco Antonio Caponi
Hello! Your submission of Marco Antonio Caponi at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know!

Hey do you edit articles on Argentine cinema? Most of the films need translation and expand, I created most of them!♦ Dr. ☠ Blofeld  12:12, 12 May 2013 (UTC)

Main Page appearance: May Revolution
This is a note to let the main editors of May Revolution know that the article will be appearing as today's featured article on May 25, 2013. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. If you prefer that the article appear as TFA on a different date, or not at all, please ask featured article director or one of his delegates (,, and ), or start a discussion at Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/requests. You can view the TFA blurb at Today's featured article/May 25, 2013. If it needs tweaking, or if it needs rewording to match improvements to the article between now and its main page appearance, please edit it, following the instructions at Today's featured article/requests/instructions. The blurb as it stands now is below:

The May Revolution was a week-long series of events that took place from May 18 to 25, 1810, in Buenos Aires, capital of the Viceroyalty of the Río de la Plata. The May Revolution was a direct reaction to Spain's Peninsular War. In 1808, King Ferdinand VII of Spain abdicated in favor of Napoleon, who granted the throne to his brother, Joseph Bonaparte. Viceroy Cisneros tried to maintain the political status quo, but a group of criollo lawyers and military officials organized an open cabildo on May 22 to decide the future of the Viceroyalty. Delegates denied recognition to the Council of Regency in Spain and established a junta to govern in place of Cisneros, since the government that had appointed him Viceroy no longer existed. To maintain a sense of continuity, Cisneros was initially appointed president of the Junta. This caused popular unrest, so he resigned under pressure on May 25. The newly formed government, the Primera Junta, included only representatives from Buenos Aires and invited other cities of the Viceroyalty to send delegates. This resulted in the outbreak of war between the regions that accepted the outcome of the events at Buenos Aires and those that did not. UcuchaBot (talk) 23:03, 13 May 2013 (UTC)

Your Arbitration evidence is too long
Hello, Cambalachero. Thank you for your recent submission of evidence for the Argentine History Arbitration case. As you may be aware, the Arbitration Committee asks that users submitting evidence in cases adhere to limits regarding the length of their submissions. These limits, currently at 1000 words and 100 diffs for parties and 500 words and 50 diffs for all others, are in place to ensure that the Arbitration Committee receives only the most important information relevant to the case, and is able to determine an appropriate course of action in a reasonable amount of time. The evidence you have submitted currently exceeds at least one of these limits, and is presently at 1304 words and 2 diffs. Please try to reduce the length of your submission to fit within these limits; this guide may be able to provide some help in doing so. If the length of your evidence is not reduced soon, it may be refactored or removed by a human clerk within a few days. Thank you! If you have any questions or concerns regarding the case, please contact the drafting Arbitrator or case clerk (who are listed on the case pages); if you have any questions or concerns about this bot, please contact the operator. On behalf of the Arbitration Committee, Hers fold ArbClerkBOT(talk) 23:59, 13 May 2013 (UTC)

You Are the One (telenovela)
Hi Cambalachero, I'm beginning the copy-edit you requested to the above article at the GOCE Request page. Please feel free to contact me, and to correct or revert my edits if I'm doing something I shouldn't. Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 07:59, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Done - feel free to contact me about any issues arising from the copy-edit. Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 02:43, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the work. I'll check it, and I hope I won't repeat mistakes Cambalachero (talk) 17:50, 16 May 2013 (UTC)

Your Arbitration evidence is too long
Hello, Cambalachero. Thank you for your recent submission of evidence for the Argentine History Arbitration case. As you may be aware, the Arbitration Committee asks that users submitting evidence in cases adhere to limits regarding the length of their submissions. These limits, currently at 1000 words and 100 diffs for parties and 500 words and 50 diffs for all others, are in place to ensure that the Arbitration Committee receives only the most important information relevant to the case, and is able to determine an appropriate course of action in a reasonable amount of time. The evidence you have submitted currently exceeds at least one of these limits, and is presently at 1304 words and 2 diffs. Please try to reduce the length of your submission to fit within these limits; this guide may be able to provide some help in doing so. If the length of your evidence is not reduced soon, it may be refactored or removed by a human clerk within a few days. Thank you! If you have any questions or concerns regarding the case, please contact the drafting Arbitrator or case clerk (who are listed on the case pages); if you have any questions or concerns about this bot, please contact the operator. On behalf of the Arbitration Committee, Hers fold ArbClerkBOT(talk) 03:33, 15 May 2013 (UTC)


 * Sorry about this - the bot has been moved over to the Wikimedia Labs, and I forgot to copy its warning logs over. This will be the last warning you'll get for this case. Hers fold  (t/a/c) 03:49, 15 May 2013 (UTC)

ITN for Jorge Rafael Videla
-- Spencer T♦ C 22:02, 17 May 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 21
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The road of the money K, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Santa Cruz Province (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:52, 21 May 2013 (UTC)

DYK for Marco Antonio Caponi
 Spinning Spark  01:26, 22 May 2013 (UTC)

Papal souvenirs
I wanted to include the NYT's article which is quite extensive without adding a lot of material to the article, however, economic statistics are made up of just such trivia. They show broad public support and an ability to inspire, which Benedict lacked, whatever his other virtues. User:Fred Bauder Talk 15:52, 26 May 2013 (UTC)

El Mercurio
Hi there! El Mercurio de Valparaíso and El Mercurio are completely different newspapers. The Valparaíso newspaper originated earlier (if I recall correctly, it was founded by Recaredo Santos Tornero or some relative of him), in the 1820s. Then later, in the early 20th century, the Santiago newspaper was founded by the, at the time, powerful Ross family, which continues to own the business. It's hard to understand that none of these articles mention each other, since the Santiago edition, and other regional newspapers such as El Mercurio de Antofagasta, for example, originated from the Valparaíso edition as independent newspapers, but dependent in their roots. Regards, Lester Foster (talk &#124; talk) 04:58, 27 May 2013 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Roberto Carnaghi
Hello! Your submission of Roberto Carnaghi at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Orlady (talk) 14:24, 3 June 2013 (UTC)

Argentina
Hello. I have been thinking a lot about the "County X in War Y" / "County X during War Y" thing myself, as well as the way people name other articles on wiki. I just got over a little discussion with another user about how the Colombia during World War II article should be named. As far as I know, there has never been any sort of standard for the WW2 military history by country articles. I have been reading over these artcles for years, and have been planning to make a few of my own, and I have seem them named according to several different naming conventions. Overall, I think "X during Y" is better, because its clearer (The Military history of the United States during World War II article being a good example [On a personal note, Id drop the "Military History of the" part]). A war is not a physical thing you can be inside of, people just say it like that for short. This is an encylopedia, so I think the proper words should be used. Also, not all countries were "in" (as in fought) World War II, but even the ones that were neutral still have relevant WW2 history, hence "X during Y", rather that "X in Y." By using "during", instead of "in," you are referring to the entire period of war (in this case 1939-1945). "In," as I said before, is short, or slang, and refers to "fighting in", or "participation in." Since many countries didnt fight in WW2, but still are important to WW2 history, "during" would be more appropriate. Argentina did declare war, but to say they actually fought in it would be more than a stretch. But those are just words. One of my main concerns is consitency. I intend to make an article titled "Latin America during World War II", for the general WW2 history of the entire region, and use it as a main article in a series. The sub articles in the series, such as Argentina during World War II, will be named consistently, and they will be structured consistently. Latin America is not a country, and therefore it did not "fight in" WW2. "During" is the only appropriate word in this case, and, for the sake of consitency, which is of paramount importance in any encyclopedia, the sub articles will be named the same way. The same can be said for individual Latin American countries: Most were neutral for most of the war, and the ones that did actually fight only saw a little bit of action, the one exception being Brazil. Having two articles, one for X country during then entire period (1939-45), like this article is, and one solely for X country's time at war, would not be neccessary, which is another reason why "during" is better, because many countries were heavily involved in WW2, before they actually declared war (obviously). About the Battle of the River Plate: The battle was an important part of the WW2 history of the region, and the article itself says that it occurred in both Argentine and Uruguay waters. But even if it did in fact occur only in Uruguay waters, Argentina is right there, and still a important part of the battle's setting. Thank you and have a nice day.--$1LENCE D00600D (talk) 20:32, 6 June 2013 (UTC)

Category:History of Argentina by city has been nominated for merging
Category:History of Argentina by city has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 06:51, 29 May 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Puerto Cultura for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Puerto Cultura is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Puerto Cultura until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. &mdash; The Anome (talk) 08:56, 13 July 2022 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:El Marginal.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:El Marginal.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:17, 1 August 2022 (UTC)

Regarding...
...this, the question sounds familiar, maybe from a few months ago. I can't find it in the archives, but the search mechanism for the archive and I do not get along. ←Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots→ 04:51, 28 October 2022 (UTC)

Deleting categories for minor planets by source of name
Hi, you missed these from Categories_for_discussion/Log/2022_November_14, and they are no longer properly parented, so please nominate them too:
 * Category:Minor planets named from Roman mythology
 * Category:Minor planets named from Greek mythology
 * Category:Minor planets named from Egyptian mythology
 * Category:Minor planets named from Norse mythology
 * Category:Minor planets named from Japanese mythology
 * Category:Minor planets named from Celtic mythology
 * Category:Minor planets named from Inca mythology
 * Category:Minor planets named from Finnish mythology
 * Category:Minor planets named from Hawaiian mythology
 * Category:Minor planets named from Hindu mythology
 * Category:Minor planets named from Inuit mythology
 * Category:Minor planets named from Aztec mythology
 * Category:Minor planets named from Slavic mythology
 * Category:Minor planets named from Arthurian legend

– Fayenatic  L ondon 22:45, 27 November 2022 (UTC)
 * I fixed the parenting for now by putting them back into Category:Named minor planets. – Fayenatic  L ondon 14:02, 28 November 2022 (UTC)
 * I already listed this case on the Administrators' noticeboard. Cambalachero (talk) 14:07, 28 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:43, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Good article reassessment of Mauricio Macri
Mauricio Macri has been nominated for an individual good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. SeeAlsoPolice (talk) 22:33, 8 January 2023 (UTC)

Good article reassessment for Mariano Moreno
Mariano Moreno has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. —Femke 🐦 (talk) 20:00, 3 February 2023 (UTC)

Thanks for your edit at ANI, but when you signed it your username didn't show, just the date
Doug Weller talk 14:21, 17 February 2023 (UTC)

Good effort at AfD/Conservative wave
I'm not sure why that got closed as keep with little more than weak assertions of notability and I felt you did a good job of explaining why the sources provided by CT55555 were no good. I would support you if you wanted to take it to WP:DRV, and in the meantime I've tagged the article. Probably worth doing a lot of cleanup on it, too. - "Ghost of Dan Gurney" (work / talk) 11:22, 8 March 2023 (UTC)