User talk:Cambridge Prof Scholars

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lordship of Hasley has been accepted
 Lordship of Hasley, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Lordship_of_Hasley help desk] . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Thanks again, and happy editing! Signed, Pichemist ( Contribs &#124; Talk ) 07:42, 6 June 2023 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, Cambridge Prof Scholars. Thank you for your work on Lordship of Hasley. User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with. Please remember to sign your reply with ~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 14:48, 7 September 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Lordship of Hasley for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lordship of Hasley is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Lordship of Hasley until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Ingratis (talk) 10:14, 8 September 2023 (UTC) Please do not be discouraged by the nomination for deletion. There might be scope for a WP article, based largely on the Baines article or for an expansion of that on Radclive to cover the subject more fully. However there is too much unreferenced and perhaps irrelevant content in your article for it to survive. You may do better looking for errors in existing articles and seeking to correct them (with precise references) than writing something new. Peterkingiron (talk) 11:56, 9 September 2023 (UTC)