User talk:Camd314/sandbox

Comments on Bibliography
Cameron: This is a good start. I think the Costello, Howell, and Smithsonian citations may also have useful information for you. Also, a couple of your contributions were duplicates of citations already on the spreadsheet; I have removed these. Please use the same format for all of your citations in your bibliography (even if the correct format has not been used in the spreadsheet).Njclum (talk) 02:19, 20 November 2016 (UTC)

Comments on Outline
Cameron: I think you will find it easier to organize material if you put it in a bulletted format. Also, it appears that you may have only included information from two of your sources.Njclum (talk) 02:23, 20 November 2016 (UTC)

Comments on Rough Draft
Cameron: This seems to be a relatively straight-forward topic and you appear to have covered most of the bases. The only obvious omission is geographic variation in morphology, but Kayla should cover that in her section. Njclum (talk) 02:47, 12 December 2016 (UTC)

Peer Review
The organization of your outline could definitely be improved. The information is presented from a neutral point of view and citations are provided, but more citations are necessary for your information. The wording could be improved as well as the organization to make the piece better. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tceg49 (talk • contribs) 15:32, 14 December 2016 (UTC)