User talk:Camdaddy09

Speedy deletion of Project lucifer
A tag has been placed on Project lucifer requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.  The Helpful One (Talk)(Contributions) 22:55, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Did you think about the possibility of proper capitalisation and making links? Eg.: Cassini Orbiter into Saturn. -- RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 20:17, 16 December 2007 (UTC)

Stubs
simply add { {stub}} to the article. However, it has already been done for Project lucifer. Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year!  The Helpful One (Talk)(Contributions) 09:53, 17 December 2007 (UTC)

Lucifer Project
Another editor has added the "prod" template to the article Lucifer Project, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also What Wikipedia is not and Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the prod template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 21:59, 23 January 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Go Figure (saying)


The article Go Figure (saying) has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Original research.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 02:01, 2 September 2009 (UTC)

Nomination of Lucifer Project for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lucifer Project is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Lucifer Project until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DoctorKubla (talk) 08:58, 28 March 2013 (UTC)