User talk:Camdennator11

Reverting a perfectly reasonable redirect with a snippy edit summary
Greetings, I'm. I've noted that you have reverted my redirection of a Promotional article, with "Vandalism will not be tolerated" as an Edit Summary. Please be more careful with your use of Huggle - verify that the edit you are reverting is definitely vandalism before you revert it. Regards Exemplo347 (talk) 15:21, 23 February 2017 (UTC)

Your Error
Before you accuse me of vandalism - i suggest you take a look at the history of the page in question. I have reverted your edit. - Happysailor  (Talk) 15:49, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

Response
You nearly blanked the whole page and I consider that vandalism
 * No, the user added text by mistake, then corrected it - you then reverted him citing vandalism, when all they did was correct their error. You then proceeded to revert me when I corrected you. If you consider that Vandalism, then you need to stop reverting people, because you are making errors in judgement and not helping the project. - Happysailor  (Talk) 15:56, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

Apple TV
Please don't automatically revert any IP address without actually checking the quality of the edit. Equinox ◑ 13:00, 8 March 2017 (UTC)

We Are the Ocean
Hello Camdennator11! I see that others have come here to complain that you have reverted something that is not vandalism. First, I'll add my own complaint: at We Are the Ocean you reverted a ip correcting formally (officially/in a formal manner) to formerly (previously/in the past). I'm dyslexic so I often get words mixed up and if I'm unsure of a words use/definition a quick google usually helps. Secondly, let me offer you some advice: if in doubt, don't act. If you aren't sure if something is vandalism, leave it be; another editor will come along and correct/revert it if needed. I see you have caught a lot of vandalism among the few errors you have made, so thank you for those edits. Keep up the good work, Gaia Octavia Agrippa Talk 22:40, 17 March 2017 (UTC)

Please advise
With regard to the article Steroid, why are registered editors not allowed to edit the article? I am a former Prof, and a PhD chemist. Why are expert changes not allowed? Is there not a better way to protect, from vandalism, for instance, limiting editing to registered editors, and them marking the article for close attention? Cheers. LeProf Leprof 7272 (talk) 18:00, 20 March 2017 (UTC)