User talk:Camel1234

Welcome
Hello, Camel1234, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type   and your question on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer. Here are a few good links for newcomers: We hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on talk and vote pages using four tildes, like this: &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom  14:38, 22 November 2012 (UTC)
 * The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Editing tutorial
 * Picture tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Naming conventions
 * Simplified Manual of Style

November 2012
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed your recent edit to Shivaji in popular culture does not have an edit summary. Please provide one before saving your changes to an article, as the summaries are quite helpful to people browsing an article's history. Thanks! MatthewVanitas (talk) 14:50, 22 November 2012 (UTC) Camel1234 (talk) 15:09, 22 November 2012 (UTC)I will provide summery sure.

Camel1234, you are invited to the Teahouse
Camel1234 (talk) 02:48, 23 November 2012 (UTC)Thanks

Easy way to format GoogleBooks refs
You can convert a GoogleBooks URL into a full WP footnote using http://reftag.appspot.com, so that might save you some trouble. It fills out all the fields, though if it's a book in "Snippet" mode you have to add the page number manually. Hope this helps, MatthewVanitas (talk) 17:12, 23 November 2012 (UTC) Camel1234 (talk) 17:16, 23 November 2012 (UTC) THANKS


 * No worries. Coupla suggestions: the reason your text is appearing in that weird box is that you left a space before your typing on the line. Never indent by adding spaces, just add a colon (":") at the start to indent one notch, two for another, etc. Usually when replying to folks on Talk pages, you indent one notch further than the person you're replying to. Also, you type your message first, and sign at the very end. Lastly, you generally don't want to use all-capital letters, since in Internet culture that's "SHOUTING" and comes across as impolite. Thanks for your edits so far, and good work on using clear Edit Summaries. There are probably some format improvements we can make at the Shivaji in popular culture article, and I'll post in the Talk page there once we figure those out. MatthewVanitas (talk) 17:39, 23 November 2012 (UTC)

Camel1234 (talk) 17:49, 23 November 2012 (UTC)ok

== Please stop adding trivia ==

Please stop adding trivial and tangential content, such as the painter from a movie to Shivaji in popular culture. The subject of the article is the Shivaji in culture - the content should focus on his appearance and meaning. In the context of the article you are working on, items like the painter credited in the film is complete and utter drivel creating bloat that takes away from the actual meaningful content that should be the subject of the article. The details about films should be limited to the director and the actor portraying Shivaji. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom  15:44, 26 November 2012 (UTC) Camel1234 (talk) 15:46, 26 November 2012 (UTC)ok
 * I am sorry, I completely misread a persons name and mistook it as a crew position. Please ignore the above completely misguided rant. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom  15:54, 26 November 2012 (UTC)

Please use "Preview" before saving
Hello Camel, I see you're making a lot of very small edits in a row; if you click the "History" tab of Shivaji in popular culture you'll see that it's hard to see how the article is developing because of your many small (and often with no Edit Summary) edits. It is far better to use the "Preview" button so see how your edits look, and make most of your edits on one Save, instead of making a tiny change, saving, looking at whether you like that edit, making another, saving, etc.

We all make mistakes, or forget we wanted to change one more thing a minute later, but overall please try to group edits together and provide a clear edit summary rather than a series of many small, unexplained edits on the same article only minutes apart. Thanks! MatthewVanitas (talk) 17:15, 26 November 2012 (UTC)


 * Camel1234 (talk) 17:25, 26 November 2012 (UTC)OK


 * Cool, thanks. By the way, easiest way to structure replies on a Talk page is to indent with the colon (":") so you're one space to the right of who you're replying to. Then your message, then signature. Take a look at how I've coded my reply to your here and you'll see how it goes. It's a lot of new stuff to learn, isn't it? But you seem to be taking to it well. MatthewVanitas (talk) 19:28, 26 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks Camel1234 (talk) 12:34, 27 November 2012 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:01, 24 November 2015 (UTC)