User talk:CamelEater736

September 2011
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Colchester, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.
 * Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Colchester was changed by CamelEater736 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.956807 on 2011-09-15T17:40:25+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 17:40, 15 September 2011 (UTC)

Camel
Whatever you were attempting to accomplish on this article dinged the format. I've reverted. If you need help changing something in the article, let me know.  Tide  rolls  10:36, 17 September 2011 (UTC)

September 2011
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Colchester, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.
 * Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Colchester was changed by CamelEater736 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.957573 on 2011-09-20T10:35:45+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 10:35, 20 September 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of "Henster"
A page you created, Henster, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it has no content, other than external links, categories, "see also" sections, rephrasing of the title, and/or chat-like comments.

You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thank you. DVdm (talk) 10:41, 20 September 2011 (UTC)

November 2011
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Chartism, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.
 * Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Chartism was changed by CamelEater736 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.956261 on 2011-11-16T12:16:47+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 12:16, 16 November 2011 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Frog. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.
 * If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Frog was changed by CamelEater736 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.971095 on 2011-11-16T12:24:34+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 12:24, 16 November 2011 (UTC)

September 2012
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.


 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: H was changed by CamelEater736 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.854216 on 2012-09-17T11:08:27+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 11:08, 17 September 2012 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Actor, you may be blocked from editing. bonadea contributions talk 11:15, 17 September 2012 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Wing (disambiguation), you may be blocked from editing without further notice. bonadea contributions talk 11:16, 17 September 2012 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Materialscientist (talk) 11:19, 17 September 2012 (UTC)