User talk:Camerangus73

September 2015
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on David Irving. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.  Acroterion   (talk)   11:40, 30 September 2015 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

Please stop. Wikipedia is not censored. Any further changes which have the effect of censoring an article, such as you did to David Irving, will be regarded as vandalism. If you continue in this manner, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Calton | Talk 14:45, 30 September 2015 (UTC)

By the way, oh Brand-New-Editor-Here-to-Right-Great-Wrongs, if you have a problem with the (accurate) labeling of Mr. Irving, take up your cause on the talk page. That debate, however, was settled a long time ago, so I don't expect you'll make much headway. Also, edit warring -- the continual attempts to get your way without consensus -- almost invariably leads to people being blocked from editing. --Calton | Talk 14:50, 30 September 2015 (UTC)