User talk:CameronBale

Conflict of interest policy
Hello, CameronBale. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:


 * avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
 * propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the request edit template);
 * disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
 * avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
 * do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. --Ronz (talk) 03:31, 8 January 2019 (UTC)

January 2019
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, you may be blocked from editing. Praxidicae (talk) 18:16, 15 January 2019 (UTC)

Surprised that you called my editing disruptive. The Kred Influence Metric page (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kred_Influence_Measurement) has been live and happy on Wikipedia for 8 years. I am looking for guidance as to how we can update the article with the events of the past 7 years. I am not sure why someone rolled it back. Can you give me guidance or do we need to escalate this? CameronBale (talk) 19:21, 15 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Escalate it to what? The template for deletion explicitly says Feel free to improve the article, but the article must not be blanked, and this notice must not be removed, until the discussion is closed. For more information, particularly on merging or moving the article during the discussion, read the guide to deletion. So yes, you continuing to remove it despite a clear warning is incredibly disruptive. Who is "we"? Praxidicae (talk) 19:32, 15 January 2019 (UTC)

Thank you for providing guidance, Praxidicae! I have reinstated the considered for deletion warning as suggested. When I restored the post it was inadvertently removed. Thank you. CameronBale (talk) 19:38, 15 January 2019 (UTC)

Editing Issues
"almost all content was deleted from the article by BTCGeek" per your comment on Kred Influence Measurement article revision. This is not true. I only deleted the link to Alexa, which clearly shows there isn't enough data to support the claim the article was making. This is the same reason I presented in my edit to the article as well. Happy to discuss if you disagree with that assessment.

Also, please review the Conflict of Interest policy posted by Ronz earlier on your talk page. Per your earlier message to Praxidicae, it seems like this may be an issue. --Btcgeek (talk) 00:21, 16 January 2019 (UTC)