User talk:Cameron Rumley

Welcome!
Hello, Cameron Rumley, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Shalor and I work with the Wiki Education Foundation; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.

I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Shalor (Wiki Ed) (talk) 17:21, 14 February 2018 (UTC)

Please read WP:MOVE or Help:Move
Hi. If you want to WP:MOVE your sandbox content to the mainspace, please remember to change the name of the article so that you do not create a mainspace article under a meaningless name like Cameron Rumley/sandbox. Also, if the article already exists in Wikipedia's mainspace (as Social media and the effects on American adolescents does), then please either just add your sandbox content directly to that article (with proper attribution to any other editors who contributed to that sandbox content) or you can request a WP:HISTMERGE to merge the page histories if appropriate. Please be careful not to create duplicate articles. Bennv3771 (talk) 08:07, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Thank you ! Cameron, I looked at the draft and it has several issues with it.
 * One of the main issues is that while your writing is very passionate, it's not written in the tone that Wikipedia requires. Avoid point of view terms like great, as those are subjective - what is great to one may not be to another. Also make sure that the writing style isn't too casual - it doesn't have to be as stuffy and contain ten dollar words, but Wikipedia does use a more formal writing style than a lot of other places use.
 * Avoid original research, which are claims, conclusions, and research created by yourself. With original research the claims aren't actually in the source material. On Wikipedia we can only summarize what others have written, not synthesize new material.
 * With sourcing, try to avoid studies. The reason for this is that studies are primary sources for the claims, research, data, and theories created by its researchers. Being published in a reputable journal or hosted by a notable organization or institute doesn't really make it non-primary, as neither of these places/things actively verify the information (ie, they don't replicate the research) nor do they give any sort of true analysis or reflection on the study, which is what would be needed before a study should be highlighted. There's another issue with studies, namely that they're so limited with participants. What this means is that while findings can suggest that something may be true on a larger scale, there isn't a guarantee of this because ultimately the findings are only true for these specific participants. For example, what's true for someone in the United States wouldn't really be the same for someone in Ireland, or even a person in California and Florida, as culture differs greatly even from state to state.
 * I hope that this helps - this looks like something that you're very passionate about and it's a great topic to edit, it just needs some work before it can really be merged anywhere. Shalor (Wiki Ed) (talk) 16:26, 10 April 2018 (UTC)