User talk:Cameron Rumley/sandbox

Peer Review
this is a great article to research, and you have found great sources to back up the research you have already done. one way to do more revision to your article would be to find context gaps and find sources to fill the gaps where there is no information in your article. Kamryngood (talk) 14:32, 15 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Thank you, I will take your suggestions and revise accordingly. Cameron Rumley (talk) 21:07, 6 April 2018 (UTC)

Peer Review (Second User)
Agreeing with the first review, good topic choice. You will be able to find a variety of sources with different views on the subject, given that this is a constant topic. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bretthoffman25 (talk • contribs) 14:35, 15 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Thank you I appreciate your comments. Cameron Rumley (talk) 21:07, 6 April 2018 (UTC)

Article draft
Cameron, You've got good sources and good information in your draft. Be sure not to include information that ISN'T in those sources, though. No personal opinion--I detected a little of that. Also check for clarity. A few passages were not clearly stated. This is a great start on your article, though.JAirhart 17:21, 26 March 2018 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Airhartcomp (talk • contribs)
 * I will make sure to remove any bias and use facts strictly from the source list. Thank you.