User talk:Cameronweaver

Hi there. Welcome to Wikipedia, and thanks for your contributions. Please note, however, that it's seen as a form of linkspam to add links to the same website to multiple articles (even if the site you are linking to is not in any way commercial). The best way to improve Wikipedia is to find anything useful that Intelligent Giving has to say about those charities and add that information to the Wikipedia articles (citing your source, of course). I'm aware that you've made other contributions, and I'm sure you're not doing this in bad faith - just a heads up to let you know. Have a look at this page on the sort of links that are welcomed. --OpenToppedBus - Talk to the driver 17:22, 23 January 2007 (UTC)


 * Dear Cameronweaver, After review I am reverting your links to the intelligent giving website for the three charities. The articles linked to are too shallow to qualify under WP:EL and Intelligent Giving has too low notability to make its brief assessment worthy of itself. Thanks. --BozMo talk 22:17, 23 January 2007 (UTC)


 * I have had another look through this website and actually some of the articles on it probably are worth linking too. I don't think linking every charity to its review page on IG is really on (e.g. most charity pages don't link to their pages on Guidestar, the charity commission, charity choice etc.). But I do think that some of the critical editorials (particularly ones which were then discussed in other papers) could be added. --BozMo talk 11:04, 25 January 2007 (UTC)