User talk:Cami.fisher/Landscape Genomics

TA Danae's Peer Review
Camila, I like that you've added significant content to an entry that was incomplete. Excellent job!! This information will really benefit Wikipedia and anyone looking to learn more about landscape genomics in the future. I found the opening sections to be very clear and concise, great adoption of a neutral tone and statement of fact throughout. Great balance.

Great job on organization. The section headers are a wonderful choice, they just need to be transitioned into the “Header” format when moved to the live or original Wikipedia page.

For grammar, I found very few/minor things that could be addressed, such as comma placement before the citations superscript number (for example, after W. Gilbert). Or “eg.” should be “e.g.”, but again, these are minor things. Overall, excellent job with sentence construction and punctuation.

In terms of references, all of them appear to be excellent choices, great job! In the section for “Applications in Research,” you may want to add just a few more citation markers to the articles you already have, since I don’t want the Wiki bots or editors to remove your outstanding work because it wasn’t cited enough.

Overall, excellent job on this entry! Honestly, I had a difficult time finding anything constructive to add. The only thing is I’d consider adding a little bit more about why landscape genomics is relevant or important for human evolution. Wonderful entry! Dkhora (talk) 22:12, 19 May 2020 (UTC)