User talk:Camilamenam

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pushkala Prasad (March 6)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:

The comment they left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Pushkala Prasad and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Pushkala_Prasad Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:SwisterTwister&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Pushkala_Prasad reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister  talk  05:09, 6 March 2016 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Pushkala Prasad has a new comment
 I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission:

"Probably does meet WP:PROF, holder of named chair, even though in a college not a research university, fairly extensive publications. But this is a personal webpage, not an encyclopedia article.

An encyclopedia article needs to be written in an impersonal objective style, with every statement referenced to a reliable source. An official CV can be used as a source for routine information --but the CV at her college site does not include the personal details, and these need a source also. For anything involving or implying judgement, there must be a reference from a third-party independent reliable source. Adjectives and statements of importance cannot be taken from her own publications. (for example "Her research interest are eclectic", and we do not write in academic jargon such as "She used the lens of symbolic interaction".

This is obviously copied from somewhere, though I have not yet located it. Wikipedia doesn't do it. First, it's a copyright violation, but in any case the style and content both are entirely unsuitable.

We only include in the list of publication books written or edited, and possibly a few particularly well cited papers, with citations given. We only include awards of national or international significance, not awards from her publisher or her own university.

This will need to be rewritten from scratch.  DGG ( talk ) 05:28, 6 March 2016 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Pushkala Prasad


Hello, Camilamenam. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Pushkala Prasad".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the  or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. 1989 17:52, 22 May 2017 (UTC)