User talk:CamillRose

Welcome!
Hi CamillRose! I noticed your contributions to 1974 Anti-Ahmadiyya riots&#32;and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Happy editing! Drmies (talk) 01:43, 1 July 2022 (UTC)

July 2022
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on 1974 Anti-Ahmadiyya riots. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Drmies (talk) 01:45, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at 1974 Anti-Ahmadiyya riots, you may be blocked from editing. Will you PLEASE stop reverting, particularly since a. your edits are simply not properly formatted and b. the content you are adding is extraneous, and reverted by three editors now. Drmies (talk) 02:05, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

June 2022
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to 1974 Anti-Ahmadiyya riots. Sea Cow (talk) 02:48, 1 July 2022 (UTC)

July 2022
 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for edit warring, as you did at 1974 Anti-Ahmadiyya riots. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Bbb23 (talk) 13:50, 1 July 2022 (UTC)

I am not edit warring. I am adding historical details along with citation just as the article is asking for. The other people are edit warring. Block them. Why are they not being blocked although they continually keep removing content I post. CamillRose (talk) 15:50, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
 * You were edit warring, against the judgment of four editors. What you are doing, and what you are describing, is the exact definition of edit warring. Drmies (talk) 16:14, 1 July 2022 (UTC)

I’ve been wrongfully blocked
I am not edit warring, I am new to Wikipedia while the others are more experienced. I did include explanation in summaries as well as on the talk page. My content is exactly what the 1974 Anti-Ahmadiyya Riots page is asking for: “ This article needs additional citations for verification. (January 2018)” I added factual information about the incident along with citations. But the other editors reverted to the original article which doesn’t have citation to prove their claims. If Wikipedia allows people to write anything about some incident without caring about whether it is true or not and without giving references to evidence their claims, that makes Wikipedia a scam platform. The information in the 1974 Anti-Ahmadiyya Riots is blatantly incorrect and historically inaccurate. It is false and libelous toward Muslims who have been misrepresented and debased. I have given evidence to show that the real perpetrators of the atrocities preceding the 1974 Anti-Ahmadiyya Riots were Ahmadiyya and the victims were unarmed Muslim students who were passing through Ahmadiyya city (Rabwa). History doesn’t change no matter how much someone or some group tries to hide it. It manifests itself eventually. The evidence is there, in newspapers and eyewitness accounts. If you look, you will find it. CamillRose (talk) 17:44, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
 * You just need to stop. This is a collaborative project. Four editors disagreed with you and yet you continued cause you know best, right? OK--so again, that is the very definition of edit warring. You can say a thousand times that you are right but it doesn't change the fact that your edits didn't find consensus. It's really that simple--and now you're just wasting our time. Drmies (talk) 21:34, 1 July 2022 (UTC)