User talk:Camille Marino

Dave Warwak
Your article at Dave Warwak appears to have been copied from another site. Is that correct? Who then was a gentleman? (talk) 21:57, 10 August 2009 (UTC)

I keep adding a POV tag to the article and you keep removing it. Please STOP removing the POV tag until you deal with the pro-Warwak tone of the article. All Wikipedia articles should be presented in a neutral manner. Who then was a gentleman? (talk) 17:44, 11 August 2009 (UTC)

Please see Neutral_point_of_view/Noticeboard. Who then was a gentleman? (talk) 17:48, 11 August 2009 (UTC)

August 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Dave Warwak has been reverted. Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove unwanted links and spam from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. The external links I reverted were matching the following regex rule(s): \bwordpress\.com (links: http://thomaspainescorner.wordpress.com/). If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 02:39, 11 August 2009 (UTC)

Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove unwanted links and spam from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. The external links I reverted were matching the following regex rule(s): \bwordpress\.com (links: http://thomaspainescorner.wordpress.com/). If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 04:02, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
 * 1) [[Image:Information.svg|25px]] Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added  do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used for advertising or promotion, and doing so is contrary to the goals of this project. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the  before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia.

Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove unwanted links and spam from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. The external links I reverted were matching the following regex rule(s): [a-z][0-9]+\.photobucket\.com/albums/.*\.(?:jpg|jpeg|gif|png|svg) (links: http://s550.photobucket.com/albums/ii421/anonymous1727/?action=view&current=p1010134.jpg", http://i550.photobucket.com/albums/ii421/anonymous1727/p1010134.jpg"). If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. an image file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy and therefore probably should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 16:43, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
 * 1) [[Image:Information.svg|25px]] Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added  do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used for advertising or promotion, and doing so is contrary to the goals of this project. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the  before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia.

File copyright problem with File:Warwak wiki picture.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Warwak wiki picture.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. [midnight comet]  [talk]  18:10, 11 August 2009 (UTC)

September 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Dave Warwak has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. — Jeff G. (talk&#124;contribs) 03:08, 3 September 2009 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Dave Warwak. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Zhang He (talk) 03:43, 3 September 2009 (UTC)

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Dave Warwak. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 04:00, 3 September 2009 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. The next time you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory or otherwise controversial content into an article or any other Wikipedia page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. — Cactus Writer |   needles  18:18, 3 September 2009 (UTC)

Libelous attacks
Camille Marino, your recent contributions to the Dave Warwak article are in violation of the Wikipedia biographies of living people policies. Any contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately.. As such, your additions to the article were removed. This includes the image which you uploaded with an unsourced allegation. Wikipedia takes acts of libel very seriously. Any editor who persists in adding unsourced contentious material will be blocked from editing. Please familiarize yourself with Wikipedia policies regarding verifiability, neutral point-of-view and biographical material. If you have any questions, feel free to ask me. — Cactus Writer |   needles  18:43, 3 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Or me. I would have given you similar warnings. I hope you will read our policies more carefully and agree to follow them. Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dougweller (talk • contribs) 18:55, 3 September 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Dave Warwak


The article Dave Warwak has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Only think Warwak is known for is getting fired. WP:BLP1E applies.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. kelapstick (talk) 22:45, 28 September 2009 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Dave Warwak
I have nominated Dave Warwak, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Dave Warwak. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Robofish (talk) 18:29, 2 January 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Dave Warwak.jpg


The file File:Dave Warwak.jpg has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Orphaned image with no foreseeable encyclopedic use."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Pkbwcgs (talk) 10:12, 29 April 2018 (UTC)