User talk:Camillemarie222/Beneficial weed/JasmineSandoval26 Peer Review

Peer Review
Hi Jasmine great edits to the article so far there are a few things I would change to what you have added. One would be to include the references to your sources and include a bibliography link to that source when you mention it in the article. This could be done for the Parthenium hysterophorus, a 2015 study on decoy plants, the study on the cabbage root and onion fly, and the subterranean clover.

For the Lead section I would wait to include the example on Parthenium hysterophorus being used for medicinal purposes since you already mentioned that beneficial weeds can have this property. Instead having a specific section that mentions the medical properties of beneficial weeds could be better in organizing the information. Instead you could include the section from the 2015 study talking about certain weeds being used to deter pests from their hosts plants to mention the other sections you added in the article. You could also quickly mention the positive relationship found with having plants densely packed together to avoid soil pests which you delve into later in the article.

Everything else looks great all I would change is having less specific information and examples in your lead paragrpah and instead add 2-3 sentences previewing the new additions you made on the other beneficial properties of the beneficial weeds such as detering pests and decreasing overall pest pressure. Might also be good to talk about the negative effects of treating beneficial weeds with synthetic chemicals. Cannon Hanson (talk) 00:37, 17 April 2023 (UTC)