User talk:Camiloj747

February 2016
Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Valravn (roller coaster), but we cannot accept original research. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. ''It is your personal opinion that the attractions are similar. They are indeed similar models, and the "Dive Coaster" link covers that similarity already in the lead paragraph. If you believe this distinction is notable and necessary, please bring it up in the talk page of the article. --''  McDoob AU93  19:07, 9 February 2016 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Valravn (roller coaster), you may be blocked from editing. ''You've been asked to discuss this instead of adding it back into the article again. This is non-constructive and disrupts the article. Please stop adding it and go to the talk page to discuss why you think it belongs. --''  McDoob AU93  21:30, 9 February 2016 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Fury 325. ''The cited sources in the article say 320 feet, not 325, for the drop. I'm sorry, but your editing is being very disruptive. Please seek assistance from other experienced editors prior to editing another article, or your next edit may result in privileges being suspended. I don't want that to happen, so please reach out to others and learn more about the process before continuing. --''  McDoob AU93  14:37, 11 February 2016 (UTC)

April 2018
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Seth Rogen, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.  General Ization Talk  01:49, 16 April 2018 (UTC)

May 2019
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring. Railfan23 (talk) 14:18, 5 May 2019 (UTC)

September 2020
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Deadman137 (talk) 20:45, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

January 2021
Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Snowpiercer (TV series), it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. — Young Forever (talk)   05:12, 14 January 2021 (UTC)

The One where Rachel Has a Baby moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, The One where Rachel Has a Baby, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:41, 5 April 2021 (UTC)

Reliable sources. Wikipedia is not one of them
I have noticed you are editing various tall building pages and using other Wikipedia articles as a source for your edit. Wikipedia is not a reliable source WP:RS as it is user generated WP:UGC. I have reverted your edits and explained the reason in the edit summary but you reverted my edits removing reliable sources I added. Please do not do this again as it is contrary to Wikipedia protocols. Thanks. Robynthehode (talk) 18:36, 21 August 2021 (UTC)

August 2021
Hello, I'm Donald Albury. Your recent edit(s) to the page Miami appear to have added incorrect information, so they have been reverted for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. ''Existing sources in the Miami article do not support your edits. You need to provide citations to reliable sources.'' Donald Albury 20:52, 21 August 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:The One where Rachel Has a Baby
Hello, Camiloj747. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:The One where Rachel Has a Baby, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occurred, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:02, 5 September 2021 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:The One where Rachel Has a Baby


Hello, Camiloj747. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "The One where Rachel Has a Baby".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 19:13, 5 October 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:31, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

July 2023
Hello, I'm Facu-el Millo. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Avengers: Endgame, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. —El Millo (talk) 23:38, 24 July 2023 (UTC)

September 2023
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Titanic (1997 film), did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Please review WP:FILMLEAD. DonIago (talk) 14:35, 20 September 2023 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Inception. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. —El Millo (talk) 19:07, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.


 * And might I suggest you could usefully look up ‘epic’ in a dictionary, and consult WP’s editing and film policies regarding reliable citations for descriptions included in WP articles? MapReader (talk) 19:36, 21 September 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:47, 28 November 2023 (UTC)