User talk:Cammavin85

September 2013
Hello, I'm Dawn Bard. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Ethics without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry: I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, you can use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Dawn Bard (talk) 13:53, 13 September 2013 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Ethics. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.
 * If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place " " on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Ethics was changed by Cammavin85 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.962447 on 2013-09-13T14:00:10+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 14:00, 13 September 2013 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Elockid  ( Talk ) 14:06, 13 September 2013 (UTC)