User talk:Camouflageeelife

November 2019
Your edit here suggest that you have conflict of interest with respect to the painting you persistently trying to insert to the article about Cellini. Please stop.--Ymblanter (talk) 18:45, 8 November 2019 (UTC)

Dear Ymblanter, there is no conflict of interest as all claims are verifiable at the source. I am simply a lover of art.

You have been blocked from editing for a period of indef for likely paid editing, in any case COI and WP:NOTHERE. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. User:Ymblanter (talk) 19:19, 8 November 2019 (UTC) --UTRSBot (talk) 19:47, 8 November 2019 (UTC)

I'll add that if Annex 3 is supposed to be Walden's "authentication", then it's not an authentication at all. Walden carefully describes the painting but does not explicitly provide attribution of either subject or painter. I cannot find any evidence that those experts have indeed written scientific articles about this painting. I also cannot find any press coverage - Google News gives a single press release by the organization controlling the image. Huon (talk) 21:01, 9 November 2019 (UTC)