User talk:Campusprbeck

Welcome!

Hello, Campusprbeck, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.

I notice that one of the first articles you edited was Warwick Ventures, which appears to be dealing with a topic with which you may have a conflict of interest. In other words, you may find it difficult to write about that topic in a neutral and objective way, because you are, work for, or represent, the subject of that article. Your recent contributions may have already been undone for this very reason.

To reduce the chances of your contributions being undone, you might like to draft your revised article before submission, and then ask me or any other editor to proofread it. See our help page on userspace drafts for more details. If the page you created has already been deleted from Wikipedia, but you want to save the content from it to use for that draft, don't hesitate to ask anyone from this list and they will copy it to your user page.

One firm rule we do have in connection with conflicts of interest is that accounts used by more than one person will unfortunately be blocked from editing. Wikipedia generally does not allow editors to have usernames which imply that the account belongs to a company or corporation. If you have a username like this, you should request a change of username or create a new account. (A name that identifies the user as an individual within a given organization may be OK.)

Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! Captain Conundrum (talk) 09:18, 11 April 2013 (UTC)
 * The plain and simple conflict of interest guide
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Simplified Manual of Style

Hi Captain Conundrum,

Thanks for your edits to the Warwick Ventures page. I've tried to address the issue of notability by including some additional references, which I hope is helpful.

I also notice that some of the external links I had included now show up in red as failed internal links. Could you advise on this? Thanks for your help,

Campusprbeck (talk) 12:34, 1 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Hello Campusprbeck, and thanks for contributing. You might like to have a read of External links: external links shouldn't normally be used in the body of an article, so replacing them with an internal link helps improve the encyclopaedia by creating potential links to new articles, where the subject is WP:Notable. If the companies aren't notable enough for their own article, then the internal link brackets can be removed, to "unlink" the red link. The spin-out companies' websites can easily be found by following the reference at the top of the section, which has an external link to the "Warwick Ventures spin out companies" page. Thanks, Captain Conundrum (talk) 08:47, 15 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Regarding your question about notability, I've found some more references online from WP:Reliable sources, and between those and the references you've already found it looks notable to me, so I've removed the notability tag from the top. Thanks, Captain Conundrum (talk) 09:23, 15 May 2013 (UTC)

(talk) Captain Conundrum Thanks Captain Conundrum: I'm very grateful for your help. Campusprbeck