User talk:Camsjo

August 2022
Hello, I'm Magnolia677. I noticed that you recently removed content from Berry College without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. ''I restored the content from before your edits. You removed content sourced by the Wall Street Journal for some unexplained reason.'' Magnolia677 (talk) 18:47, 23 August 2022 (UTC)


 * Hi Magnolia677. Thanks for the input around using edit summary. I'll be sure to do that moving forward. I am new to editing Wikipedia articles and always open to learning. That being said, my edits were not a mistake. The Wall Street Journal article referenced is 10 years old (only available through the Wayback Time Machine), is a "pay to play" article and also honestly doesn't even back up the sentence it was originally used as a citation for. So, should we be concentrating on making sure Wikipedia maintains old outdated information and becomes no better than an old printed encyclopedia, or should be be trying to update the information to share the current and relevant information people are looking for? In addition, the information under the heading you rolled back doesn't even really fall into that category. It seems like someone stuck it under "Religion" just to make a point. So, what I spent time adding was well thought out, properly cited and relevant to what people might actually be looking for. Camsjo (talk) 23:03, 23 August 2022 (UTC)