User talk:Camyoung54/Archive 1

Your academy page
I've replied to the answers you left on your academy page. For the future would you like me to let you know each time or are you keeping an eye/watchlist on it? Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 23:38, 20 January 2013 (UTC)
 * I can just watch it, thanks for the offer. Camyoung54 (talk) 17:33, 21 January 2013 (UTC)

In response to your feedback
Upload Wizard

Camyoung54 (talk) 03:32, 26 January 2013 (UTC)

&#160;

Disambiguation link notification for February 3
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Medfield Public Schools, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Public school (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:42, 3 February 2013 (UTC)

Unreliable sources tag at Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting conspiracy theories
Hi Camyoung54, could you explain your tagging of Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting conspiracy theories with unreliable sources? If I had to guess, you're probably referring to the primary sources from conspiracy theorists. While these would be inappropriate to explain the actual events of the shooting, they're not being used that way. They're being used simply to verify the existence of the theories themselves, which I believe is appropriate based on WP:PRIMARY. Please consider removing the tag, letting me know what you think here, or starting a discussion on the article's discussion page. See Tagging pages for problems. Thanks, BDD (talk) 20:39, 4 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Just to update you, another editor has removed the tag. If you'd like to discuss the issue further, you're welcome to do so. --BDD (talk) 20:54, 4 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Hi BDD, thanks for letting me know, I miss understood the use of the unreliable source? tag next to some of the references and thought it would be helpful to tag the article with unreliable sources. I understand now and realized I misused that template. Camyoung54   talk  21:40, 4 February 2013 (UTC)
 * No worries. Thanks for understanding. --BDD (talk) 21:51, 4 February 2013 (UTC)

Deltatheroides
Thanks for the notification, i correct the redirect. Burmeister (talk) 02:26, 6 February 2013 (UTC)

A belated welcome!
Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Camyoung54. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia: Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes ( ~ ); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.
 * Introduction
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * How to write a great article

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on, consult Questions, or place helpme on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! The Anonymouse (talk &#124; contribs) 17:48, 8 February 2013 (UTC)


 * Sorry, my Twinkle settings post welcome messages at the top. The Anonymouse (talk &#124; contribs)  17:52, 8 February 2013 (UTC)


 * It's OK, I use Twinkle too. Camyoung54   talk  17:53, 8 February 2013 (UTC)

Bravotv-promotion
There is not very much info. in the section because I just created it. It is possible that it should be a stub, but I see that the stubs are seriously backlogged. I'm just letting you know that even-though it is labeled, "promotions/contests" the intent is not to advertise or promote but to annotate promotions.I also started a topic on the articles talk page if you would care to discuss this 24.0.133.234 (talk) 18:08, 8 February 2013 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks for tagging new articles. If you wait a few moments, it allows refserve to run, and take care of cites. That way you can avoid your tagging being for naught. Best.--Epeefleche (talk) 04:27, 10 February 2013 (UTC)
 * OK, thanks for the tip. Camyoung54   talk  04:28, 10 February 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 10
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Ngando Pickett (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Puma


 * Rafael Casco (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to National Autonomous University

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:27, 10 February 2013 (UTC)

Winter storm naming
I just wanted to make you aware of this discussion I started at Winter storm naming. I have no intentions of making any changes to the article myself, but was just hoping to get input from editors previously involved in the article (or recently-closed AfD) in an effort to improve the article and clarify its purpose. I will leave any changes to the consensus of other editors who decide what's best. Your participation would be welcome, regardless of your views on the issue. Thank you. 76.189.111.199 (talk) 22:22, 18 February 2013 (UTC)

Rabbit
Hello, I'm not sure if you regularly contribute to the article Rabbit or if you just came across it on a check of CAT:ESP (I assume from your edit history it's the latter, same as me). I was in the middle of declining the edit request that you incorporated, not because I disagreed with the request, but because the entire section was a copyright infringement. See my comment at Talk:Rabbit and let me know if you agree. I think that section needs to be rewritten ASAP as it contained really good information if not for the fact that it was copy-pasted. &mdash; KuyaBriBri Talk 15:17, 22 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Yes, I agree. I only accepted the edit request because the numbers didn't make sense to me, however made more sense with the edit that was requested. I had no idea the section was a copyright infringement and definitely agree it needs to be rewritten since it is so similar to the page you mentioned on Talk:Rabbit. Camyoung54   talk  15:22, 22 February 2013 (UTC)

Answering SP edit requests
Hey there. First of all, thank you for your work with WP:SPER. However, when you answer a request asking for clarification or sources, could you change  to   in the Edit semi-protected template? Doing so saves other editors the trouble of looking at requests that have already been answered, and that can't be carried out anyway without further input from the original requester. Thanks. — daranz [ t ] 07:11, 26 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Yes, I will going forward. Thanks, Camyoung54   talk  20:17, 26 February 2013 (UTC)

Amazon.com
Amazon.com is a reliable source and is used on SEVERAL PAGES through out Wikipedia. You cannot call it unreliable if it is used on several pages. 184.58.22.86 (talk) 11:58, 1 March 2013 (UTC)

Your request for rollback
Hi Camyoung54. After reviewing your request for rollback, I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback: If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see New admin school/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing!  Malinaccier ( talk ) 19:22, 2 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
 * Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
 * Rollback should never be used to edit war.
 * If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
 * Use common sense.


 * I've also given you the reviewer user right. Check out WP:REVIEWER for more info. Happy editing!  Malinaccier  ( talk ) 19:22, 2 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Thank you! - Camyoung54   talk  20:04, 2 March 2013 (UTC)

modification Benoit charest
I have edited this page because i contained false information. And for some reason it keeps re-appearing.I will have to report this Thank you Greenrectifier (talk) 20:47, 3 March 2013 (UTC)
 * OK, my mistake, to me it looked like vandalism. - Camyoung54   talk  20:50, 3 March 2013 (UTC)

A.K. Dewdney
Sir, I edited the entry on A.K. Dewdney as per Professor Dewdney's request. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mishipeshu2 (talk • contribs) 02:09, 4 March 2013 (UTC)
 * I have reverted my edits back to your edit, as well as formatted the citations correctly. - Camyoung54   talk  02:18, 4 March 2013 (UTC)

Harry Taylor (swimmer)
Hi there, I am Harry Taylor. I'm trying to remove personal information about myself, but you seem to keep undoing the changes. I'm new to this, but understand that as a non-public figure, this should not be a problem. Could you point me in the right direction if I'm missing something? Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ht1968 (talk • contribs) 03:42, 4 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Under Wikipedia's policies, users are not allowed to blank a page without receiving general consensus from the community. If this policy is violated, the edit will be treated as vandalism and reverted. However in your case, I would propose the article for deletion, see WP:PROD and after ten days if no one objects to the deletion, the article will be deleted. But since olympians are quite notable, see WP:Notability it might be hard for the article to be deleted. - Camyoung54   talk  20:21, 4 March 2013 (UTC)

Regarding NMES and EMS
Hello, I wanted to comment on the opening article of electrical stimulation. I'm in a physical therapy program and in some sense we specialize electrical stimulation. My concerns were of electrical muscle stimulation (EMS) and neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) are actually not the same type of treatment. Nueuromuscular stimulation uses the peripheral nerve to stimulate muscular contractions with parameters that effect the motor fibers. Whereas, electrical muscle stimulation is used in treatments of denervated muscles with parameters that surpass motor-level stimulation. If you wrote that wiki, I would assume you have great insight into a lot of electrical stimulation and how it works. Let me know what you think. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.219.224.110 (talk) 02:04, 9 March 2013 (UTC)
 * I was not involved that wiki, however I patrol for vandalism. When I saw your edit, I noticed that you made commentary about the article in the article. Wikipedia welcomes edits opinions however when discussing the article, please discuss it on the articles talk page. I did not remove your edits because were wrong, but because it was talk with the article. Please place your above statement on the articles talk page to discuss with other edits and have the article changed. Thanks, - Camyoung54   talk  15:03, 9 March 2013 (UTC)

Sorry about that, I realized I commented on the wrong page after the fact. Never commented on the talk page before so I was just figuring it out. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.219.224.110 (talk) 16:19, 9 March 2013 (UTC)


 * It's OK, I'm glad you understand how talk pages work now. - Camyoung54   talk  21:07, 9 March 2013 (UTC)

Joe Rogan Experience
Why revert my edits on Joe Rogan Experience? I set the format to match other popular podcast pages, eg. The Adam Carolla Show and corrected the basic English mistakes on the page. --Thebunni (talk) 02:54, 9 March 2013 (UTC)
 * I'm sorry I do not know why I reverted your edits, please feel free to add them again. - Camyoung54   talk  14:53, 9 March 2013 (UTC)

Saigon has not gone
You applied speedy tags to Saigon Xuan Thanh F.C., Saigon F.C. and three others. This was wrong. All these redirects are well-established and still have several incoming links from articles. Please be more careful. &mdash; RHaworth (talk · contribs) 12:20, 11 March 2013 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

 * Thank you very much! - Camyoung54   talk  20:03, 13 March 2013 (UTC)

Bainki
Your edit comment is not any different than that of the two bots who have already been reverted. Did you have an additional reason for doing this? Thanks, Unscintillating (talk) 23:45, 13 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Yes, before this was a double redirect and I directed it to the correct place. I don't understand why you reverted the bots who tried to fix the double redirect like me. - Camyoung54   talk  23:47, 13 March 2013 (UTC)
 * So your explanation is that the double redirect is "correct"? How did you find this article?  I think that the double redirect is wrong, because this redirect will only be used by someone who doesn't know the name is really Bairiki, and if the user doesn't have Javascript enabled he or she may not even find the intended target.  I'm suspecting that I should make it a soft redirect.  Unscintillating (talk) 00:09, 14 March 2013 (UTC)
 * I found this double redirect at Special:DoubleRedirects, it compiles the list of double redirects in an attempt to get editors or bots to fix them. I directed Bainki to the place where Bairiki directed to, in order to have a single redirect on Bainki. There is no article for Bairiki, so the person would end up at South Tarawa even if they do know the correct name. Please leave the redirect the way it is. Thank you. -  Camyoung54   talk  00:40, 14 March 2013 (UTC)

Congratulations from STiki!

 * Thank you very much! - Camyoung54   talk  19:18, 14 March 2013 (UTC)

Kwanzaa
Hi.

As far as I can tell I was pretty accurate with my description of Kwanzaa. If you can prove me wrong in claiming that it is something other than "fake african christmas" then forward the links to NO@gmail.com.

Thanks

Bastardshack. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.100.129.121 (talk) 03:08, 16 March 2013 (UTC)
 * I reverted your edit because it was vandalism. Please either edit constructively or you will be blocked from editing. - Camyoung54   talk  13:19, 16 March 2013 (UTC)

Madagascar wagtail
Thanks for your note. I am not familiar with how to "remove speedy deletion tags" etc, but it seems to me that there exists a page called Madagascar Wagtail, and that Madagascar wagtail ought to redirect there. I haven't actually changed anything in case I misunderstood your note. DanielPAustin (talk) 20:31, 4 March 2013 (UTC)
 * The page was a double redirect in which it redirected to itself. These pages are considered not useful and are deleted, however I can recreate the page and direct it to the correct page if you would like me to. - Camyoung54   talk  20:37, 4 March 2013 (UTC)
 * I think this redirect should exist. But I am not sure if there is a Wikipedia policy on whether common names of animals should be capitalised (Madagascar Wagtail, Black Bear, White Rhinoceros...) or not (Madagascar wagtail, black bear, white rhinoceros...). Having worked for a number of publishing houses, my impression is the consensus is the latter nowadays, but Wikipedia seems to follow neither format with any consistency. The pages for black bear and white rhinoceros, for example, use lower case. There is an argument, then, that Madagascar Wagtail should actually redirect to Madagascar wagtail rather than the reverse. Perhaps Wikipedia already has a stated style policy on which convention should be used...?? DanielPAustin (talk) 01:18, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
 * I have recreated the redirect, however this time I directed it to the correct target (Madagascar Wagtail) instead of before when it just redirected to itself and got caught in a redirect loop which is why it was deleted. Thanks for discussing this with me. - Camyoung54   talk  01:36, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Just to note, the policies on article titles are located at Article titles. - Camyoung54   talk  01:42, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Thanks. It turned out that the policy generally is to use lower case for common names of animals (except where the name contains a proper noun, of course). However, owing to contrary traditional usage among ornithologists, bird names are standardly capitalised on their own page, but not where mentioned elsewhere. Given this anomaly, I think we did the correct thing in ensuring the lower redirects to the upper. DanielPAustin (talk) 00:30, 19 March 2013 (UTC)

SHONDA RHIMES
I REALLY DON'T APPRECIATE SOMEONE TRYING TO CLAIM MY WORK,NOR THE PICTURE POSTED ON WIKIPEDIA  FOR SHONDA RHIMES IS NOT ME,THAT IS MY GHOST NAME FOR MY WORK. THAT'S IS FRAUD TO PUBLIC AND ALSO THEFT FROM ME. MY IS LASHANDA MICHELE FARMER I HAD A PICTURE POSTED WITH MY WIKIPEDIA PAGE BUT I GOT A MESSAGE SAYING TO RESUBMIT,ON WIKICOMMONS. I WANTED IT PUT ON MY WIKIPEDIA PAGE. I NEVER GAVE ANYONE PERMISSION TO ACT LIKE SHONDA RHIMES. I HAVE COMPLAINED REPEATEDLY. I ALSO WOULD LOVE IF ANYBODY HAS ANY INFO ABOUT ANYONE AND OR ABOUT THAT WOMAN THAT'S CALLING HERSELF SHONDA RHIMES PLEASE CONTACT THE F.B.I 217-522-9675......I AM THE OWNER OF ABC TELEVISION NETWORK®,SHONDALAND®,MARK GORDON PRODUCTION CO®,AMONG OTHER SUBSIDIARIES.″LaShanda Michele Farmer 21:32, 27 March 2013 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lashanda farmer (talk • contribs)


 * I am sorry that you are in this situation, however there is not much that I can do. A few things:

Once again I apologize that you are in this situation, and unfortunately I am unable to help you too much. Thanks, - Camyoung54   talk  00:31, 28 March 2013 (UTC)
 * 1) Please do not make edits that are in ALL CAPS. Always use proper capitalization and grammar when using Wikipedia.
 * 2) Discuss this matter with other editors at the Shonda Rhimes talk page. There are others that may have more information on this issue and will be able to help you.
 * 3) If the above suggestion does not help, you can discuss this matter with the Wikipedia Administrators, they have more power on the wiki and could possibly help you. They can be reached at one of their noticeboards.

Talkback
Gold   Standard  16:15, 31 March 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Compton and Bloomfield
Hello Camyoung54. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Compton and Bloomfield, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Target fixed. Thank you. ~ Amory ( u  •  t  •  c ) 19:58, 10 April 2013 (UTC)
 * OK, I tag the double redirects and let the author know they were tagged, in the hope that they will fix them and remove the tag. I try to fix them myself, but in the case where I don't know where the redirect is supposed to go, I tag it for speedy deletion. Thanks for fixing it. - Camyoung54   talk  20:47, 10 April 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: High School Confidential: Secrets of an Undercover Student
Hello Camyoung54. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of High School Confidential: Secrets of an Undercover Student, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Clear and useful target. Thank you. ~ Amory ( u  •  t  •  c ) 19:59, 10 April 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Sharon and my Mother-in-Law
Hi, I'm new to wikipedia. I got your message and speedy deletion notice. I'm still trying to figure out what works and what doesn't for wikipedia. We are learning about wikipedia in our social media class and today we were all trying it out. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rabahya (talk • contribs) 16:33, 20 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Hi Rabahya, the speedy deletion notice you are referring to was not left by me but by Deadbeef, please discuss any questions you may have about why the article was deleted on his talk page. The reason I left a message was to left you know that I had removed your edit from Outline of the Palestinian territories because your contribution had been previously deleted. Please remember to always sign your name using the four tildes ~, and feel free to check out the new contributor's help page. Let me know if you have any other questions. Thanks, - Camyoung54   talk  21:41, 20 April 2013 (UTC)

Thanks Camyoung54, I'm still getting the hang of this :) --Rabahya (talk) 12:59, 21 April 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Arlene's Grocery
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Arlene's Grocery. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — RFC&#32;bot (talk) 16:18, 21 April 2013 (UTC)

Mountain Dew original slogan
Hi, your reversion of my edit to the Mountain Dew page is incorrect. Based upon the print, and memorabilia advertising created by Mountain Dew, along with the television commercials following their acquisition by Pepsi, it is evident that their original slogan was, "It'll tickle yore innards." The edit I performed was neither incorrect, nor unnecessary, as it corrects a factual inaccuracy in the article text. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bobartig (talk • contribs) 20:02, 21 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Based on the the source given on the Mountain Dew page following the original slogan, it reads as “Ya-Hoo Mountain Dew. It’ll tickle your innards.” Please do not change this without a reliable source. Also, please always sign your name using the four tildes ~ . Thanks - Camyoung54   talk  23:48, 21 April 2013 (UTC)

AFT5 re-enabled
Hey Camyoung54 :). Just a note that the Article Feedback Tool, Version 5 has now been re-enabled. Let us know on the talkpage if you spot any bugs. Thanks! Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 00:45, 24 April 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Taliban
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Taliban. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — RFC&#32;bot (talk) 17:31, 25 April 2013 (UTC)

CVUA
Hi Cam, sorry I just seemed to drop off the radar and not get back to you. I've been looking through your contribs and you seem to be doing a great job as is. If you'd like to continue with the CVUA or have any questions you'd like answered let me know. I'm happy, if you'd like, to do a quick focus on a few areas then give you the final test so you can officially graduate. If you'd rather not, that's fine and I wish you the best on Wikipedia for the future. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 12:06, 28 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Hi Callanecc, nice to hear from you. Thanks for the offer, but I feel like I have enough experience with vandalism now and feel like I no longer need help. Thank you for what you have done to help me and if I have any questions I will definitely ask you. - Camyoung54   talk  18:05, 28 April 2013 (UTC)

Forgot to tell you...
I've retargetted Erasa Chocolate Moth to the article about it under its scientific name. The creator of the redirect probably copied and pasted - and forgot to check which one he'd pasted... Does happen. Peridon (talk) 17:59, 28 April 2013 (UTC)
 * OK, thanks for letting me know. - Camyoung54   talk  18:01, 28 April 2013 (UTC)
 * I made that look as though I knew, didn't I? Actually, I wondered if it were a hoax or not and Googled it... Peridon (talk) 18:15, 28 April 2013 (UTC)
 * I was wondering the same thing myself, but I trust you that it is not. - Camyoung54   talk  00:06, 29 April 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Play-Doh
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Play-Doh. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — RFC&#32;bot (talk) 14:17, 29 April 2013 (UTC)

Help test new SuggestBot design
We have developed an exciting new version of SuggestBot’s interface with some cool features! Volunteer to be one of the first users to try it and help us make it better by answering a short survey! If you’re interested in participating, leave us a message on SuggestBot’s user talk page. Regards from Nettrom, SuggestBot’s caretaker. 18:52, 22 April 2013 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:45, 28 April 2013 (UTC)

SuggestBot beta test
Hi, and thanks so much for volunteering to try out the new SuggestBot design! You can find your suggestions and the survey on this page. Let me know if there's anything. Regards, Nettrom (talk) 19:51, 29 April 2013 (UTC)


 * No problem, love the bot. - Camyoung54   talk  11:46, 4 May 2013 (UTC)

General Purpose Macrogenerator
I’ve fixed the redirect at General Purpose Macrogenerator (got page name and anchor backwards); thanks for the note at my talk page!
 * —Nils von Barth (nbarth) (talk) 02:58, 5 May 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Deaths in 2013
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Deaths in 2013. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — RFC&#32;bot (talk) 11:16, 7 May 2013 (UTC)

Hershey High
I believe my edits were proper and in line with Wikipedia standards.

The alma mater does contain extra words that are sung at the end of a line. Alumni of the school will surely tell you this, as it is a tradition. Otherwise, the alma mater is incorrect.

As for the notable alumni, it seems that the one I deleted included himself only for personal promotion. The inclusion of him and the many details that the description includes, lowers the bar for "notable" so low, that you might as well put all alumni on the page. It should also be noted that the first alum appears to be a pornographic actor/director.

64.115.12.73 (talk) 18:34, 10 May 2013 (UTC)


 * Please see WP:NLIST.- Camyoung54   talk  19:49, 10 May 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/John C. Meringolo
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/John C. Meringolo. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — RFC&#32;bot (talk) 06:16, 11 May 2013 (UTC)

Just wanted to know
Hi, I recently got an email notification saying that you have posted on my talk page, though when I checked clearly you haven't. Just wanted to clear things up. I'm new here and want to know if this is some kind of bug with the email notifications thing, because I think I have disabled email notifications anyway. -Ugog Nizdast (talk) 13:53, 13 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Hi Ugog, I have not posted on your talk page, and so it must have been an email notification bug, although I have never seen that before. If this issue persists, discuss it at the WP:Village pump, where editors experienced in technical issues can help you solve the problem. Thanks, - Camyoung54   talk  19:37, 13 May 2013 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 03:31, 14 May 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Anime and manga
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Anime and manga. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — RFC&#32;bot (talk) 01:17, 15 May 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Rape and pregnancy controversies in United States elections, 2012
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Rape and pregnancy controversies in United States elections, 2012. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — RFC&#32;bot (talk) 19:32, 18 May 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Westboro Baptist Church
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Westboro Baptist Church. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — RFC&#32;bot (talk) 14:16, 22 May 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Moldova
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Moldova. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — RFC&#32;bot (talk) 09:16, 26 May 2013 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot's suggestions. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information on the SuggestBot study page.

IMPORTANT CHANGES: We have modified the selection of articles SuggestBot suggests and altered the design to incorporate more information about the articles, as described in this explanation.

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information.

Changes to SuggestBot's suggestions
We have changed the number of suggested articles and which categories they are selected from. The number of stubs has been greatly reduced, the number of articles needing sources doubled, and two new categories added (orphans and unencyclopaedic articles). We have also modified the layout of the suggestions and added sortable columns with various types of information about each article. The first two columns are:


 * Views/Day : Daily average number of views an article's had over the past 14 days.
 * Quality : Predicted article quality on a 1- to 3-star scale. Placing your cursor over the stars should give you a pop-up describing the article's quality (Low/Medium/High), current assessment class, and predicted assessment class.

The method we use to predict article quality also allows us to assess whether an article might need specific types of work in order to improve its quality. The work needed might not correspond to cleanup tags added to the article, since our method is not based on those. We have added five columns reflecting this work assessment, where a red X indicates improvement is needed. Placing your cursor over an X should give you a pop-up with a short description of the work needed. The five columns seek to answer the following five questions:


 * Content : Is more content needed?
 * Headings : Does this article have an appropriate section structure?
 * Images : Is the number of illustrative images about right?
 * Links : Does this article link to enough other Wikipedia articles?
 * Sources : For its length, is there an appropriate number of citations to sources in this article?

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 00:09, 28 May 2013 (UTC)