User talk:Can't sleep, clown will eat me/5

Congrats
Congrats on your adminship. Let me know if you need anything. Prodego talk  02:27, 8 April 2006 (UTC)


 * Congrats from me as well, glad things worked out better this time. =) —Locke Cole • t • c 02:29, 8 April 2006 (UTC)


 * Congrats! Finally you have become an admin! The patience you have shown over previous failures were commandable. You truly are my inspiration. Good luck for the future and hope you try for RFB in about a year's time! -- S iva1979 Talk to me 15:07, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Me too, me too! Werdna648T/C\@ 16:56, 13 April 2006 (UTC)

Congratulations!
Congratulations! Consensus having been reached, it is my pleasure to inform you that you are now an administrator on the English Wikipedia. Please take a moment to review the Administrators' reading list and the Administrators' how-to guide before using any of your shiny new buttons. :-) If you need assistance or advice, please feel free to request help from other administrators at the Administrator's Noticeboard and Administrator's Noticeboard for Incidents, or to leave a talk page message for me or any other admin. Again, congratulations!

Also, just wanted you to know, I made a special note to sign back in tonight to make sure your RfA would be closed tonight; wouldn't want that record number of supports to have to wait until tomorrow! :-) Essjay Talk • Contact 02:28, 8 April 2006 (UTC)


 * Hey congratulations, Can't sleep, on a well-deserved win. Use it for the good! :-) SlimVirgin (talk) 02:32, 8 April 2006 (UTC)


 * I too would like to congradulate you. Raul654 02:37, 8 April 2006 (UTC)


 * Congrats! --Syrthiss 02:42, 8 April 2006 (UTC)


 * My earlier comment got deleted, but Congrats, and sorry about those twelve opposes :) We tried to shift their votes ^_^ &mdash; Deckill e r 02:43, 8 April 2006 (UTC)

Ahhh great, now CSCWEM is gonna be noobing it up on WP:ANI. Fehhhhh :-P Cyde Weys 02:48, 8 April 2006 (UTC)

AIIIIIIII! ::victory shriek:: —BorgHunter ubx (talk) 03:54, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Congratulations! Though I'm somewhat dismayed that SlimVirgin stole my RFA-congrats picture. :P   _-M     o     P-_     03:45, 8 April 2006 (UTC)


 * Congrats on the mop - and decimating my record! Don't think this means you can be lax on keeping champagne disambiguated. ;-) bd2412  T 04:05, 8 April 2006 (UTC)

Apparently you are sleeping, since you haven't edited in 5 hours. So was this whole user name thing about not being able to sleep just a lie? I didn't say that out loud, did I? Hey, Congrats on the admin thing. You waited longer than you needed to, but you got this record smashing result for doing so :-). NoSeptember   talk  04:27, 8 April 2006 (UTC)


 * Congratulations on your successful RFA! You've made it to WP:200, the first! :) --Ter e nce Ong 04:53, 8 April 2006 (UTC)

Been busy all day and haven't logged on so I just saw this. Congratulatiions from the land of blizzards. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 05:45, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Congrats! You should have become one a long time ago. VegaDark 06:47, 8 April 2006 (UTC)

Damn you! (Well, everyone else was congratulating you, so I thought I'd go against the flow). --Jeffrey O. Gustafson - Shazaam! - &lt;*&gt; 07:17, 8 April 2006 (UTC)   Congrats

Congratulations on your adminship. --WikiCats 11:19, 8 April 2006 (UTC)

Yes finally! about time.

What took you so long? Oh, by the way, your Cabal application is in the mail. Good luck, and be sure to wear your flame retardant pajamas! – ClockworkSoul 13:12, 8 April 2006 (UTC)

Congratulations from me too! And as to your question, the pants and shoes are also black and match the jacket quite perfectly, but there's no belt (yet). J I P | Talk 16:09, 8 April 2006 (UTC)

Offer a warm congratulations on the RfA; best wishes with all it comes with! May you encounter many a delicious hidden milkshake on your nightly adventures. See you about the RC! ~ PseudoSudo 16:15, 8 April 2006 (UTC)

'''OMG, I'm in for it now. You will not defeat me! I eat newbie admins for breakfast!!1!!111! Page Vandal/Clown Eater 16:25, 8 April 2006 (UTC)''' —The preceding comment was added by 205.188.117.5 (talk • contribs) 16:25, 8 April 2006 (UTC).

Congrats on your adminship. May all your nights be long and sleepless... -- gtdp (T)/(C) 19:55, 8 April 2006 (UTC)

Goncratulations! - O bli (Talk) ? 21:41, 8 April 2006 (UTC)

Congratulations on your new mop and bucket! :) - Cheers, Mailer Diablo 03:46, 9 April 2006 (UTC)


 * Welcome to the fold. — xaosflux  Talk  04:19, 9 April 2006 (UTC)

Hi cscwem, I have a question - why did you move Requests for adminship/Can't sleep, clown will eat me 2 to Requests for adminship/Can't sleep, clown will eat me too? I was just curious - BTW congrats on your recent promotion. :) --Khoikhoi 03:05, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
 * See BD2412's edit at the top of Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/Can't sleep, clown will eat me too. ~ PseudoSudo 03:43, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Ah, thanks. --Khoikhoi 05:35, 9 April 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for reverting vandalism on my user page; it's much appreciated. And congrats on your RfA!!! AmiDaniel (Talk) 03:50, 9 April 2006 (UTC)



LoLzz Man... this is great! I have seen many pages here but ....yours is different! I can safely say (I think) I have never seen anything like it ( I think in my short life of 24 years ha ha ha), from your nick to your profile.. excellent! very original and very innovative..congratz!! P.s.I hope its ok to contact you here (Fireblade)

Belated congratulations on your RfA! Sorry it wasn't on my watch. I knew when you came up again the support would be overwhelming. Considering your user name, you might enjoy my "Ode to a Misunderstood Clown" on my user page. Congrats again and Cheers! -- Cecropia 04:56, 14 April 2006 (UTC)

sorry
I intended no disrespect. But if you considered that "vandalism" you are not familiar with discordianism. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.170.234.249 (talk • contribs)

A Download Is Now Available
I just wanted to let you know that a download of VandalProof has recently been made available. AmiDaniel (Talk) 09:48, 9 April 2006 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 04:02, 10 April 2006 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Fat, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. T B C ??? ???  ??? 07:09, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Hrmm. Looks like VandalProof has some kinks.  8-)  Can&#39;t sleep, clown will eat me 07:10, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Yeah, sorry about that. We were reverting vandalism at the same time, and the Vandalproof tool accidently sent the message to you. Hope you don't mind, T B C [[Image:Confused-tpvgames.gif|18px|]] ???  ???   ??? 07:17, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Not at all, I've been meaning to take it out for a test drive actually. How do you like it? Can&#39;t sleep, clown will eat me 07:18, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Its very useful, as it can revert vandalism in seconds, keep track of all vandals, as well as send warning messages. However, as seen above, it does have a few flaws. -- T B C [[Image:Confused-tpvgames.gif|18px|]] ???  ???   ??? 07:22, 10 April 2006 (UTC)

Inanna
is another one of her socks, currently blanking pages as well. --Khoikhoi 18:59, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
 * She gave herself away on WP:ANI (check the recent history). Unfortunately, the only thing that is going to stop this person is some sort of an IP range block.  I have submitted a request to WP:RFCU regarding this matter.  Can&#39;t sleep, clown will eat me 19:15, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Alright, thanks. Her IP does seem to change all the time, which is how she is able to evade blocks. --Khoikhoi 19:20, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Just got confirmed. --Khoikhoi 19:24, 10 April 2006 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks for your quick revision on Matrix Reloaded. --vex5 21:53, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Actually, you have Wilt to thank for that. This vandal had apparently "visited" a number of different pages within the past few minutes, and my warning note was related to a few of the others.  Can&#39;t sleep, clown will eat me 21:59, 10 April 2006 (UTC)

Hello!
Isn't Can't sleep, clown will eat me said by Bart Simpson in episode 9F08? Anonymous anonymous 23:31, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Yes, the phrase can be heard in the Lisa's First Word episode, amongst other places. Can&#39;t sleep, clown will eat me 23:32, 10 April 2006 (UTC)

Talk:Pearland High School
Discussion about what unsourced statements should be allowed, and which ones shouldn't is now occurring on the article Talk page. Johntex\talk 00:01, 11 April 2006 (UTC)

Cheers
Thanks for clearing the vandalism off my talk page. Have a good one, michael talk 05:14, 11 April 2006 (UTC)

Vandal warning/block messages
Man, you're really going to town reverting and blocking vandals! Thanks. But you're not leaving (m)any warning messages! That doesn't help admins reverting subsequent damage by the same users who need a history of warnings to justify a block. You could try the vandal warning toolbox to make it almost as easy as using the revert button, but it would be good if you would leave messages regardless of the means. --Kbh3rd talk 19:11, 11 April 2006 (UTC)

Western Betrayal concerns
Hi Can't Sleep.

Thanks for reaching out to me. I'm a bit confused. I did just make a number of near all tiny edits, but what material in particular were you referencing?

Thank you in advance for your patience and I do apologize in advance for any mistakes I made. I do not want to be a party to anything even resembling vandalism.

Have a good day, --Gbinal 12:21, 12 April 2006 (UTC)


 * Some examples where you mistakenly removed content include Western betrayal and Coca-Cola .  Again, this can be easily avoided by using the preview button to see the differences you have made before committing the change.  Can&#39;t sleep, clown will eat me 12:24, 12 April 2006 (UTC)

I just read your second message and now these msgs. Thank you for letting me know about that. I will try to be much more careful. A question (and again thank you for your input), but is there a doable way to look back down the list of my contributions to see if there were other such occurances? Rather, do I need to go back indefinitely in search of such major errors or are the ones you listed 'it'. I'll be quite careful from now on. --Gbinal 12:28, 12 April 2006 (UTC)


 * Well, I'm not sure how it is happening that so much content is being erased, but if you use the preview button first just to double check, then you will see what effect you are making on the article before it goes into effect. If you want to verify your previous contributions, just click on "my contributions" (Special:Contributions/Gbinal) in the upper right hand corner.  Can&#39;t sleep, clown will eat me 12:32, 12 April 2006 (UTC)

Changing the duration of a block
Hi, Can't sleep, regarding this, if an admin blocks a user while a previous block is in effect, the shorter block is the one that actually "takes". So if you block someone for a week, and then think you've been a bit harsh and decide to change it to two days, then all you need to do is reblock for two days. However, if you block for two days and then think it's not enough, you need to unblock temporarily in order to extend the block. It's also a good idea, if you think a particular block is the right length, perhaps because you're familiar with the history of a particular vandal, to check the block log (at the top of the vandal's special contributions) a few minutes after you've blocked, just in case another admin saw one or two bits of vandalism without the personal abuse, and gave a short block without checking, just after your long block.

By the way, you're doing great work. I was doing a bit of RC patrol, and every time I was about to rollback, I saw you had done it before me! AnnH ♫ 12:23, 12 April 2006 (UTC)


 * That would explain why I see so many unblock and immediate reblocks in the logs. Thanks for the advice I will keep that in mind.  Can&#39;t sleep, clown will eat me 12:26, 12 April 2006 (UTC)


 * The system really needs to be fixed to tell you that the vandal is already blocked (and for how long). bd2412  T 07:31, 13 April 2006 (UTC)

My RFA
I have responded to your OBLIGITORY question on my RFA :D Cheers! -- light darkness (talk) 14:47, 12 April 2006 (UTC)

Concerning User:209.91.190.82
Thank you for applying the block, but I think the whole mess may have been caused by me...I did block the IP for a very short time (15min), but as I contribute from work, I didn't get around to leave the block-msg (boss came in, meeting for 2 hours....). Cheers. Lectonar 16:34, 12 April 2006 (UTC)

Congrats
Thanks for the nice message on my talk page. That RfA was fun to watch, and it was my pleasure to cast an early support vote for you. Your kind words are much appreciated. Please do the same and drop me a note or feel free to call on me if you need anything, I rarely sleep as well (looking at Interiot's tool, it appears I only sleep between 13-15 UTC!) --Krich (talk) 17:22, 12 April 2006 (UTC)

Thanks!
Thanks for reverting vandalism to my userpage!   _-M     o     P-_     23:08, 12 April 2006 (UTC)

Yeah, same from me.-- MrFi s  h Go Fish 16:01, 19 May 2006 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/D-Mat
Gracias for the fix. I always get tangled up in what goes where how on these things, and if I do somehow manage to get it right, it will change next week anyhow... =) Zotel - the Stub Maker 02:26, 13 April 2006 (UTC)

My talk page reversion
Thanks for reverting the personal attack on my talkpage, but I'd like to keep them there. Unless it's pure vandalism, I kind of want to keep posts there even if they are attacks or whatnot. Just a personal preference. Thanks though. :) Buchanan-H  e  rmit™ .. SCREAM!!! .... 07:56, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
 * No problem, I'll make a note of that. *scribble*  Can&#39;t sleep, clown will eat me 08:03, 13 April 2006 (UTC)

Clown
clown very nice, i like. Unixer 08:44, 13 April 2006 (UTC)

Hi it's me again. Can't sleep, clown will HIT me ! Unixer 13:02, 19 May 2006 (UTC)

Range block
I noticed you blocked the 137.146.175.0/24 range after the user changed IP addresses so often (probably you blocked the computer lab of Colby College). Does this mean the individual blocks that you and I set before will expire earlier now? (which wouldn't be such a bad thing because the vandal has stopped using these addresses anyway). I'm just curious - I'm new to being an admin (and not an experienced vandal-fighter) and this is the first range block I see. Kusma (討論) 02:11, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Probably not, but I'm not the most experienced person to ask. I would assume that the original blocks would expire in 31 hours, and the range block in 99 minutes from when it was originally placed.  But I might be wrong.  Can&#39;t sleep, clown will eat me 02:12, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Since the IP address that the vandal was using resolve to dhip-0xx.public.miller.colby.edu (where xx are digits), and since Colby has a Miller Library, it seems to me that he/she was moving from one public terminal in the library to another. Since such terminals sometimes require log-ins, a complaint to Colby might get our vandal into trouble.  Bucketsofg 02:29, 14 April 2006 (UTC)

revert on my talk
Thanks for taking care of the revert on my talk page! I've apparently drawn the attention of a problem user. *sigh* Thanks, ---J.Smith 18:41, 14 April 2006 (UTC)

Continuing Vandal
Hello, I see that you recently blocked a vandal that I reverted. I believe he is back with a different but similar IP, as he's made the same vandalice edit to Scientology, the first one you blocked was User:80.47.89.176, the new one is User:80.47.185.206. Thanks, Chuck 18:57, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
 * This vandal is being eaten alive by clowns as we speak. Can&#39;t sleep, clown will eat me 19:20, 14 April 2006 (UTC)

Feedback
Dear new admin, You did not reach your quota of 400 blocks in your first week as an admin (although you were close). Please do better in the future ;-). NoSeptember   talk  15:24, 15 April 2006 (UTC)

Thanks (TS page)
Dear cscwem, thanks so much for your ongoing counter-vandalism efforts on the TS page !! That site crops up lots of places ... Sandy 17:25, 15 April 2006 (UTC)

Hello again!
Hi! Just wondering, how long have you been an administrator? (Reply at my Talk Page )

Take care --- Ω Anonymous anonymous Ψ: &#39;&#39;Have A Nice Day&#39;&#39; 23:29, 15 April 2006 (UTC)

Ihateclowns.com
Had you seen this store yet? OSU80 23:36, 15 April 2006 (UTC)

Vandal alert
Hey there. I see that you recently warned anonymous editor User:152.163.101.12 that if s/he vandalised again, s/he would be banned. Well, s/he vandalised List of Fascists by including George W Bush on the list. I know how you would hate to block someone who had this completely original and hilarious idea but them's the breaks. Cheers --Roisterer 05:29, 16 April 2006 (UTC)

VandalProof 1.1 is Now Available For Download
Happy Easter to all of you, and I hope that this version may fix your current problems and perhaps provide you with a few useful new tools. You can download version 1.1 at User:AmiDaniel/VandalProof. Let me warn you, however, to please be extremely careful when using the new Rollback All Contributions feature, as, aside from the excessive server lag it would cause if everyone began using it at once, it could seriously aggitate several editors to have their contributions reverted. If you would like to experiment with it, though, I'd be more than happy to use my many sockpuppets to create some "vandalism" for you to revert. If you have any problems downloading, installing, or otherwise, please tell me about them at User:AmiDaniel/VP/Bugs and I will do my best to help you. Thanks. AmiDaniel (Talk) 06:43, 16 April 2006 (UTC)

Rachel Marsden
I have been meaning to thank you for your sterling help on Rachel Marsden. Now that you are an administrator, please contribute your thoughts to the following discussion. --Cyberboomer 21:20, 17 April 2006 (UTC)

Hulk Hogan
I don't know what the hell happened when I made that edit. I swear to God that when I made it, I had only put that Hogan was dominated (instead of having the upper-hand) during the KOTOR match. For some reason it says I put he was 6'8" and all this other stuff. I do not know what is going on. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 207.177.243.223 (talk • contribs) 17 April 2006 (UTC)

Nil by Mouth (charity)
Hi there, CSCWEM. Could you look at the page Nil by Mouth (charity) and consider reverting back to either Tawkerbot2 or my last revert please? While it's technically vandalism, I don't want to risk 3rring. If the IP vandalism continues, I'll ask for the page to be semi-protected. Thanks. &mdash;Wh o  uk (talk) 08:17, 18 April 2006 (UTC)

Phaser duel
Hi there! No problem: at first, I wondered the reason for the revert, but this was made clear through later edits. Now if only phasers were faster than us, we'd be laughing ... or in pain!? :) Take care! E Pluribus Anthony | talk | 10:41, 18 April 2006 (UTC)

Wikitruth
Sorry about that; I've changed it to be clearer. Tlogmer Talk / Contributions 06:58, 19 April 2006 (UTC)

Anonymous IP vandal
Thanks for cleaning up the vandalism and blocking the IP. Isopropyl 05:39, 20 April 2006 (UTC)

Sara Wilson, The Differences are Fun Collection, Blood On The Popcorn, etc.
Well, you're right about the verify problem there. I was looking at the new article The Differences are Fun Collection, by the same editor, and couldn't verify any of the book titles. (Tried Google, Amazon, and the Library of Congress catalog). Put on a "hoax" tag. Now the article says that the books are "self distributed". It looks like all the contributions of may be questionable. There are about fifteen of them, linked to each other, and they include promotion of a band that has no verifiable notability, or indeed, verifiable existence. I've put a reasonably nice, but somewhat stronger, note on Starchaser65's talk page. If you wish to take stronger measures, that's up to you. I suspect that a bulk AfD may be necessary. --John Nagle 06:35, 20 April 2006 (UTC)


 * OK, you're on it; I'll leave this to you. Thanks. --John Nagle 06:55, 20 April 2006 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks for warning the vandal, O clown-fearing one. I was heading there myself, but you were faster and it's probably better that the warning not come from the person who was attacked. Thanks. —Josiah Rowe (talk • contribs) 15:00, 20 April 2006 (UTC)

The Simpsons
Did you get your username from the Simpsons? Just wondering! ^^ - Brittany 03:26, 21 April 2006 (UTC)

Birthday parties
I guess suffering from coulrophobia means you can't go to birthday parties... Thought I'd bring it up!  K ilo-Lima|(talk) 16:06, 21 April 2006 (UTC)

IP blocks
Hi, I was wondering since you've been blocking vandals for a while, if you block a group IP, do all registered users on it get blocked? I tried and got blocked.. well I got blocked, then could edit, then got blocked again. Thanks, H ig hway Rainbow Sneakers 19:16, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Yes, unfortunately whenever a "shared" IP address is blocked it affects any party using that address. There is a proposal to reform this at WP:BPP if you are interested.  Can&#39;t sleep, clown will eat me 19:18, 21 April 2006 (UTC)

Abusive User
i'm contacting you because i was left an insulting and abusive message on my user page from user:Fr3nZi3 someone i dont even know and who had nothing to do with the current conversation on the page which we were having for reason of another user, they did this completely out of the blue. I've left the very rude and abusive comments there for you if you would like to take a look. Is there anything you can do, thank you for any help you can give. (Lil crazy thing 19:30, 21 April 2006 (UTC))
 * Already taken care of. Can&#39;t sleep, clown will eat me 19:46, 21 April 2006 (UTC)

Thank you i only noticed you had taken care of it once i had already sent the message. Thank you for your help. Lil crazy thing 19:52, 21 April 2006 (UTC)

Thank you!
Thanks for reverting the vandalism to my page! {edit: And thanks for blocking the vandal as well, I was about to list him at AIAV but you beat me to it!} --Doug (talk) 17:36, 24 April 2006 (UTC)

Didn't quite understand that
What specifically was unencyclopaedic about the bit you reverted from Finnish profanity? -- Cimon avaro; on a pogostick. 09:26, 25 April 2006 (UTC)


 * This is what triggered the revert, all done by the same anonymous editor. If you believe this or anything else contributed by this editor was verifiable and encyclopedic, please let me know. Can&#39;t sleep, clown will eat me 15:30, 25 April 2006 (UTC)

Okay, that is a perfectly fine revert. Something wrong with the watchlist diff function, apparently. I didn't see that last added comment in it at all. Very curious.

Although not ideally phrased, the definition of "hinttari" is essentially correct, though hardly NPOV. -- Cimon avaro; on a pogostick. 16:24, 25 April 2006 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lance _________
Wondering if you wouldn't mind eyeballing this for me. I have the feeling that it's a vanity page and fairly strong evidence that some (though not all) of the "Keep" votes are from a group of friends of his. It just feels like they're trying to wikilawyer their way into keeping the page. Is there any strong argument I'm forgetting? Thanks, Girolamo Savonarola 23:42, 25 April 2006 (UTC)

131.181.251.66
User:Ansell is suffering collateral damage from your block of 131.181.251.66. I might suggest they ask their university's network support to investigate the vandalism.--Commander Keane 07:05, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
 * That is a very good suggestion, thanks for your assistance Commander Keane. Can&#39;t sleep, clown will eat me 16:26, 26 April 2006 (UTC)


 * Is it possible to remove the repeat vandal tag from the talk page until WP:BPP is decided on and implemented, given that your evidence on my page was all self-reverted within 1-2 minutes? I don't mind the block on the IP, as long as the collateral damage doesn't occur, and the tag will likely have the IP blocked once again very quickly without warning as it says, causing me a great deal of nuisance when I am at university wondering what to do between morning and evening classes... Maybe a checkuser would confirm for the moment that there have been sufficient good edits from registered users through that IP to support this collateral request. Ans  e  ll  23:11, 26 April 2006 (UTC)

Another vandal
Hey there. Yesterday you warned User:202.6.138.33 that they would be blocked if they vandalised any other article like they did to Chris McDermott. They promptly vandalised Port Adelaide Football Club. Could you please follow through on this blocking? Cheers --Roisterer 04:42, 27 April 2006 (UTC)

Also 195.195.161.3 needs blocking .... Cheers MikesPlant 10:03, 28 April 2006 (UTC)

Gunt vandalism
Hi, The same edits again at this page. Would it be possible to protect it? Dl yo ns 493  Ta lk   07:18, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
 * It is a nuisance, but it doesn't appear to be a serious enough problem to warrant semi-protection at this time. I would suggest asking WP:ANI first to gauge consensus.  Can&#39;t sleep, clown will eat me 08:20, 28 April 2006 (UTC)

Philip Herschkovitz
Now, when the article Philip Herschkovitz looks developed, could we remove the verification and stub tags? (Dmitrismirnov 12:37, 29 April 2006 (UTC))

Orange on wheels!!!
Can you unprotect and delete that. There are several of them and it's easier to tell what the vandal is creating if the links are blue in the deletion log. Thanks. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 20:10, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Sure thing. Is this a habitual problem?  Can&#39;t sleep, clown will eat me 20:15, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Thanks. It started yesterday (I think) and is someone who wants to be a WoW vandal. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 20:21, 30 April 2006 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks for the quick revert on my userpage! Much appreciated. --TeaDrinker 17:00, 2 May 2006 (UTC)

And thanks for the revert on my page as well. --TheKoG (talk|contribs) 12:35, 3 May 2006 (UTC)

And mine! Thanks for dealing with the persistent vandal/spammer who did it too. &mdash; Es  tarriol  talk 12:38, 5 May 2006 (UTC)

Shane McMahon
Hey i just wanted to let you know that i'm having problems with a person that has just joined up saying they are shane mcmahons fiancee and that his is getting divorced and doesnt have a second child like every single wrestling newsite has reported. Now i have asked her many times to stop claiming untrue things but she is ignoring them and rather believe her story of being engaged to a married man. Could you please cotnact her and ask her to stop adding them things because she keeps carrying on and changing the mcmahons pages to suit her story. her user name is User talk:Blueeyes1971. Thanks for any help cos i'm fed up off hearing her lies, if you go to my page under the first comment its under that as she doesnt even know where to put a new comment theres a few i deleted so you'll have to go in my history.

Thanks

Kola Boof article help!
Hello Mr. Clown Will Eat Me,

I saw that you helped out with reverted the Kola Boof vandalism the other day. Thanks!

Unfortunately, the user behind that has continued (and continues now) to keep vandalizing and editing the article to his/her benefeit, and I've been forced to create a "Requests for comment" page here. It would be awesome if you could stop by it and see if you could add anything to it. Thanks again!

Shamrox 20:13, 4 May 2006 (UTC)

Sorry, I should have been a little more clear. Could you go to this page: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment/Fermico2 - and add your signature under "Users certifying the basis for this dispute"? It would be awesome! Thanks! Shamrox 09:18, 5 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Shamrox, considering your recent chat with Danny, the RFC is premature and counterproductive. Would you like me to delete it? We should focus on working on verifying sources in the article. We do have to treat these situations gently. The article will get worked out over the next few days and the end result will be consistent with Wikipedia standards. NoSeptember   talk  10:47, 5 May 2006 (UTC)

Hey guy, yeah, I'd say go ahead and delete it. Just jumped the gun a little. Take care. Shamrox 17:32, 5 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Done. NoSeptember   talk  18:03, 5 May 2006 (UTC)

It's crazy recipe madness day!!
User:Salmaakbar has posted several recipe articles today. At the rate he's going, it'll take forever to get all these deleted. Perhaps you might pursuade him to stop. I don't know if it's kosher for a non admin to do it. --Bayyoc 02:58, 8 May 2006 (UTC)


 * Hi Bayyoc, thanks for bringing this to my attention. I'll inform Salmaakbar that these should be added to the Wikimedia Cookbook project, not Wikipedia.  Can&#39;t sleep, clown will eat me 03:01, 8 May 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for reverting vandalism
Thanks for reverting my talk page. Doesn't look like you saw my alert on Administrator intervention against vandalism re User:81.83.48.223 so I removed it once you blocked him. Hey just curious, of all time frames, why 31 hours? Thanks again :) -  Gl e  n   TC (Stollery)  07:20, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
 * The whole 31 hours thing seems to predate me, but my best guess is that other administrators began using it to ensure that daily vandals received the block message in case they try again at the same time the next day. Can&#39;t sleep, clown will eat me 07:24, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
 * kinda makes sense I guess? ;) Thanks again, -  Gl e  n   TC (Stollery)  07:37, 8 May 2006 (UTC)

Poison pill
Damn man! You are just too fast! I knew I should'nt have voted on your RFA, those tools are just making you faster than you were!! But anyway you got to revert his edit & I got to warn him so I guess we are even!

Cheers & happy vandal hunting

Srik e it ( talk ¦  ✉  )  19:56, 8 May 2006 (UTC)

thanks
Thanks for reverting the vandalism on my user page...however, I allow users/anons to vandalize my page. Unless the vandalism is lame/not funny, I usually keep it and laugh. But thanks anyway. --Osbus 01:36, 9 May 2006 (UTC)

Edit war on Isaac Newton.
Hi, I saw that article Isaac Newton has been vandalized many times as much as Michael Jackson's article has been vandalized. So, Could you make the article Isaac Newton to be protected article for 24hrs because of recent vandalism. Sorry, I'm not administrator or Wikipedia and I don't know how to control the article to make protective page. So, Could you make Isaac Newton's article protected? Please... Sorry to bother you about this. Send me message about it. Daniel5127, 04:45, 9 May 2006(UTC)


 * Excuseme, Do you still check on article Isaac Newton for recent vandalism? I hope you can discuss with me about semi-protected article for Isaac Newton, or not. Please feel free, to send me message on that. ok? Cheers.

Daniel5127, 05:01, 12 May 2006 (UTC)

Tony Gunawan
Hi there, you requested references for this one. Do you like the AsianWeek article I added? Looks rather detailed to me. Cheers, Nikai 13:23, 10 May 2006 (UTC)

Vandalism Water Rocket
Sorry I missed the additional vandalism on Water rocket. I just went to all of the contributions of 168.170.204.100 and fixed his/her vandalism. I did not check for any additional vandalism. Thanks for catching it. Sometimes vandalism slips and remains for a month. See Mike Gallagher (history) for an example of vandalism than remained for almost a month. --Asbl 19:25, 10 May 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for fixing my userpage
I guess I should look at it more often or something, have a good day--M4bwav 19:41, 10 May 2006 (UTC)

Thank you
Thank you for taking care of User:Asoczewko. Love the user name! :) - Emt147 Burninate!  00:51, 11 May 2006 (UTC)

User:67.15.28.21
From User talk:David.Mestel:

Thanks for leaving me a comment David, this IP address has vandalized the same article 3 times and was subsequently blocked. Can&#39;t sleep, clown will eat me 06:46, 11 May 2006 (UTC)


 * But at the time it vandalised, it hadn't been warned at all. --David.Mestel 06:52, 11 May 2006 (UTC)


 * It appears to be a compromised web-proxy, based upon how it is interpreting the backslash characters,, in which case it should be permanently blocked. I am in the process of investigating this now while it is temporarily (31 hours) blocked for vandalism.  Can&#39;t sleep, clown will eat me 06:55, 11 May 2006 (UTC)


 * If he is an open proxy, then sure, block him for ever and a day. If not, though, I think you should unblock him, since he had recieved no warning. --David.Mestel 06:58, 11 May 2006 (UTC)


 * Confirmed and permanently blocked as an open web proxy. Thanks again.  Can&#39;t sleep, clown will eat me 07:02, 11 May 2006 (UTC)

Vandalism from 166.66.0.0/16 range
Thank you very much for your help with dealing with this user's vandalism. Considering his threat left on User_talk:166.66.76.151 of going and finding another computer, could a temporary range block in order? Also arin's whois utility reports these addresses are from Millersville University. Could/Should we contact them to see if they can help in dealing with this vandal too? I'm just curious about procedures in this case. Thanks --Charlie(@CIRL 07:57, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Seconded. --Zpb52 07:58, 11 May 2006 (UTC)


 * Consider it done, 5 minutes ago. 8-)  Can&#39;t sleep, clown will eat me 08:00, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
 * You rock. ^_^ --Charlie(@CIRL 08:02, 11 May 2006 (UTC)

Please help
Hey cscwem, can you please help me out with a banned user? Remember -Inanna-? She's currently trolling as. Thank you. &mdash; Khoikhoi 23:39, 11 May 2006 (UTC)

20 week block
Are you sure you want to block a school IP for 5 times the maximum IP block time? Prodego talk  02:12, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
 * This needs to be investigated and is being added to Abuse reports as it has been blocked over 20 times in the past. Can&#39;t sleep, clown will eat me 02:16, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
 * I knew there had to be a reason, but you had me worried there ;-) I did see all the blocks, but wouldn't a month long one suffice? Happy editing. Prodego  <sup style="color:darkgreen;">talk  02:19, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Probably not, the block is severe because the vandalism is equally so. It is unfortunate, but this seems to be the only way we can obtain the attention of network administrator on the other side.  Can&#39;t sleep, clown will eat me 02:21, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
 * I guess this is exactly why WP:ABUSE was made. Thanks for explaining the block to me, hopefully WP:ABUSE will work. Good luck! Prodego  <sup style="color:darkgreen;">talk  02:25, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
 * I have noticed that you have made several more IP blocks over a month, and I would like to remind you that doing so is against policy. Please limit your IP blocks to a month in the future. Thanks, Prodego  <sup style="color:darkgreen;">talk  17:19, 19 June 2006 (UTC)

Vandal User:GOH
User:GOH is a bad bad boy. --Bayyoc 03:04, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
 * ...and has been put to bed without dessert. Can&#39;t sleep, clown will eat me 04:25, 12 May 2006 (UTC)

Chinese Zodiac Userboxes Revert
Okay, so the left box holds a chinese character, I realize that now. They are still ugly as sin, however. Fake User 09:49, 13 May 2006 (UTC)

Chinese human rights page
Hi there, not sure if you're the one to talk to about this but you're the only admin that's talked to me.. There's an argument breaking out on the human rights in the People's Republic of China page that could probably use some admin attention before too long.. It's getting a little heated. Do you know anyone that might want to do that? TastyCakes 21:32, 14 May 2006 (UTC)

Thanks also
Thank you for saying Happy Birthday. Because Yesterday was my 17th Birthday. Daniel5127, 06:32, 15 May 2006 (UTC)

Quick response to vandalism of Clinton article!
Hi there, I just wanted to thank you for your quick response to the vandalism of the article Bill Clinton, and also to say that I find it funny that three people (you, me, someone else) were reverting the vandalism at almost the same time. --Tachikoma 17:09, 15 May 2006 (UTC)

Ka-pow!
Hey, far be it from me to criticize, since you're the Grand Duke of Antivandalism and all, but NB that 216.81.249.82 seemed to have desisted after I left test4 (and I thought going straight to test4 was pretty bold). The vandalism was pretty egregious and clear, though, so I suppose I understand why you went ahead with the block. Regards, Kaisershatner 17:13, 15 May 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for the punnery
Dear &mdash; Thank you for your support on my recent RfA. It succeeded with a final tally of 72/2/0 and I am now an administrator. I'll be taking things slowly at first and getting used to the new tools, but please let me know if there's any adminnery I can help you with in the future. &mdash;Wh o uk (talk), 29 July 2024 (UTC)

Vandal IP
That IP you warned on May 9. he's back again. Will you block him? --Gangsta-Easter-Bunny 12:54, 16 May 2006 (UTC)

Musicianforums
Sorry about that. I didn't realize there were two of us going for the revert at the same time. My apologies. IrishGuy 21:27, 16 May 2006 (UTC)


 * No problemo, I think we've got it right now. Can&#39;t sleep, clown will eat me 21:28, 16 May 2006 (UTC)

No Worries
I go to the Southlake Carroll High School and that page is terrible, I know. Thats been my "to do" list forever. --Minfo 03:50, 17 May 2006 (UTC)

Most original/imaginative username ever!
Just a quick note to say that your username has got to be the most original username I've ever seen in all my years on the Internet. -- Andrew Parodi 19:29, 17 May 2006 (UTC)

The name actually comes from an episode of the Simpsons called Lisa's First Word. Nevertheless I find this username to be hilarious and a good reminder. Congrats! Simply south 22:28, 17 May 2006 (UTC)

Thanks
Just looked at my page's history (I've been gone a while) and saw that you reverted some extremely offensive vandalism. For that I thank you. Chooserr 06:41, 18 May 2006 (UTC)

Grizzly/polar bear hybrid image
I would not risk keeping Image:Hybridpolargrizzlybear.jpg for the moment - this is indeed a case where our use of an image that appears to be privately owned could diminish its commercial value. In a few weeks, we will see if it is still widely circulating on the internet, which indicates that the owner is not bothering to enforce his right to exclusive use. Our fair use claim will be stronger if the image owner's laxity has already allowed the commercial value of the work to diminish. Furthermore, we should crop it down to just the bear (we have no fair use claim to depict the hunters, who also have publicity rights) and use a lower res than the original. bd2412 T 14:51, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
 * That makes perfect sense, thank you for the advice. Can&#39;t sleep, clown will eat me 15:28, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
 * (Note: copied my response and your reply to my own talk page bd2412  T 15:41, 18 May 2006 (UTC))

vandal 168.99.166.2
Curps had blocked them for 24 hours before you hit your block, care to unblock and reblock them for your time limit? for reference. Syrthiss 16:10, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Will do. Can&#39;t sleep, clown will eat me 16:10, 18 May 2006 (UTC)

VandalProof 1.2 Now Available
<div style="border: 1px solid gray; background-color: ;"> After a lenghty, but much-needed Wikibreak, I'm happy to announce that version 1.2 of VandalProof is now available for download! Beyond fixing some of the most obnoxious bugs, like the persistent crash on start-up that many have experienced, version 1.2 also offers a wide variety of new features, including a stub-sorter, a global user whitelist and blacklist, navigational controls, and greater customization. You can find a full list of the new features here. While I believe this release to be a significant improvement over the last, it's nonetheless nowhere near the end of the line for VandalProof. Thanks to Rob Church, I now have an account on test.wikipedia.org with SysOp rights and have already been hard at work incorporating administrative tools into VandalProof, which I plan to make available in the near future. An example of one such SysOp tool that I'm working on incorporating is my simple history merge tool, which simplifies the process of performing history merges from one article into another. Anyway, if you haven't already, I'd encourage you to download and install version 1.2 and take it out for a test-drive. As always, your suggestions for improvement are always appreciated, and I hope that you will find this new version useful. Happy editing! --AmiDaniel (talk) 02:11, 21 May 2006 (UTC)

QUT proxy block again
You were the admin to last work with the block on 131.181.251.66. I would appreciate it if you could have a look into it again as it has been blocked again. This time for a week, which I think is extreme for an educational institution with 40,000 students. BTW, I can edit here through secure.wikimedia.org, but its really annoying to get into. Thanks, Ans  e  ll  Review my progress! 02:45, 21 May 2006 (UTC)

Astrological Signs
Since we have a lists of births and a list of deaths, why don't we make it more intresting. Like Astrological Signs. Anybody that was born under any sign, I'm not sure, like the Virgo, all we got to do is see if they were born in August 23 through September 21. What do you say? I mean anybody, not just the Virgo. So .. what do you say? - 21 May 2006/12:05 P.M. - A Different World

The golden age of hip hop for deletion?
I see that The golden age of hip hop is up for deletion. I wonder what you think of this. P.O.N.Y. 17:35, 21 May 2006 (UTC)

CJayC
Hi, there was a request to unprotect this page at WP:RFP. The circumstances surrounding the protection seemed a bit strange to me so my response was that the person requesting an unprotect should ask you, since you were the protecting administrator. There seems to be some reluctance to do that on the part of the user requesting the unprotect, so I thought I would leave you a message directly in case you care to weigh in at WP:RFP. Best &middot; Katefan0 (scribble) 07:03, 22 May 2006 (UTC)

AHS Centaur
Hi, Why did you remove the image of the Australian government propaganda poster I added to the AHS Centaur entry? No reason for this was given and I think that the image is highly relevant to the article. --Nick Dowling 01:45, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
 * This was partially my mistake. Thank you for replacing the image.  Can&#39;t sleep, clown will eat me 01:56, 23 May 2006 (UTC)

WP:ABUSE
Hello there. You've expressed some interest in being an investigator over here, and we've a fairly large backlog. If you could come over and help to investigate cases when you've a moment, it'd be exremely helpful. Thanks! Snoutwood (talk) 16:07, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Oh, and why's this page semi'd? Since you're a fairly active RC patroller with a hefty deletion log, it's important for new and unregistered users to be able to contact you. I note that you aren't the protector, but it's been that way for three months. What's the story? Snoutwood (talk) 16:13, 23 May 2006 (UTC)

Tots TV vandal
I just noticed that you tried semi-protecting the Tots TV article for a few days. I tried that myself a month or two back and, while it keeps the Tots TV vandal off that one page, he just hits other pages. And the edits he makes to the Tots TV page are so distinctive, they are one of the easier ways to see that he's active.

In general he's a low volume vandal. He uses one IP address a day, occasionally two, and once blocked that's it until the next day. And he tends to be spotted and blocked fairly quickly because of his distinctive edits, usually by Curps. Given all this, especially the fact that he just moves on to other vandalism when Tots TV is S-protected, I came to the conclusion after my test of S-protection that it was best just to leave it open, keep the page watched, and revert/block him each time he returns. - TexasAndroid 16:08, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Agreed, although it is a nuisance. Can&#39;t sleep, clown will eat me 16:13, 23 May 2006 (UTC)

147.72.109.136
It's 24 hours because we both blocked at the same time. If you want to unblock and reblock it's OK with me. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 17:24, 23 May 2006 (UTC)

User:ExplodingPineapple
Just saw that you're around, so can you review his edits and block him if needed? He's listed on WP:AIV already, but it's persistant and annoying. Thanks. -- Jjjsixsix (talk@ 00:59, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Done, done-done-done. Can&#39;t sleep, clown will eat me 01:07, 24 May 2006 (UTC)

AOL secure connection
Please see my user page for a report of my trial of the secure link. Mixed results -- very slow and I couldn't access this user page, among others. Had to wait to write here until AOL cycled again. Thanks for your continued interest. WBardwin 06:26, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
 * That is a shame that the secure link is so ... slow? I wonder why it underperforms compared to the non-secured version. Can&#39;t sleep, clown will eat me 17:56, 24 May 2006 (UTC)

64.132.172.213
Block them. They are well past last warning. Daniel Case 17:52, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Done as of 17:51 UTC. 8-)  Can&#39;t sleep, clown will eat me 17:53, 24 May 2006 (UTC)


 * Thanks! Daniel Case 17:54, 24 May 2006 (UTC)

Block of school address
You blocked this IP on 23rd of may for 99 hours. This is the IP (61.69.12.19) of my school's computer labs, is there any way to block anon editing whilst allowing legit users (such as myself) to contribute? Also, 99 hours is more han 4 days!, this IP will probably always cause trouble, but can you keep future blocks to <2 hours or so (the time in the computer room is divided into 1 and a half hour blocks). I would also like to say thast i acknowledge that a lot of junk comes from this IP, but i really want to edit during the boring lessons. MichaelBillington 08:17, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
 * If this problem of repeat vandalism persists, please have the system administrator of your school contact me at the email address posted on my user page. Can&#39;t sleep, clown will eat me 08:19, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
 * I've encountered a slight problem, according to the block log, this IP was banned for 99 hours on May 23, I am confused as to why the block has not expired. Also, i'm working on a letter to the admin of our school to alert him of the problem. Why was this page protected, is the vandalism here that bad?!

Thanks for the tip
Thanks for the advice, O great blocker of vandals! Keep up the good work! Srik e it ( talk ¦  ✉  )  08:20, 25 May 2006 (UTC)

Thanks!
Thanks for reverting the vandalism on my userpage! Fabricationary 14:58, 26 May 2006 (UTC)

Why are you vandalizing pages?
You are doing reverts on Colonial Hills and Columbus and Xenia Railroad for no reason. The information you reverted was useful and you gave no reason for your reversions. Please stop vandalizing pages. george 15:11, 28 May 2006 (UTC)


 * Well, I thought I was supposed to put brackets around everything that didn't move. I shall refrain from bracketing dates in the future. Thank you. george 01:13, 29 May 2006 (UTC)

Interesting comment
Hey, check out this comment about your [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:132.33.132.19#Please_get_rid_of_the_clown. userpage] made by a vandal. I found it sort of interesting... :) -- ☆ TBC  ☆  19:49, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Scarred as a child? Who knows, probably just trolling.  8-)  Can&#39;t sleep, clown will eat me 17:33, 29 May 2006 (UTC)

The ghost from Filipino hip hop past
I saw your history in the Filipino hip hop article (where that user told you to go away) and I just wanted to let you know I am dedicating myself for the next few days to do a complete and through cleanup. I have already removed most of the images and have asked a user who is knowledgeable about it to reinsert about 8 of them. Please comment on my entry in the talk page. Talk:Filipino_hip_hop Thanks! --mboverload @ 09:45, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Will do. The two main objections I had last year were the numerous external links to MySpace and the possible violation of fair use with the pile on of copyright imagery.  It appears my first concern has already been resolved.  Can&#39;t sleep, clown will eat me 17:31, 29 May 2006 (UTC)

Userpage renovation
Really sorry, started it and then got caught up in exams, which have honestly found me unaware. If its ok with you, I'll finish the renovation the second I go on summer break, which should be sometime next week. Again, sorry! :( Master of Puppets FREE BIRD!  04:35, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Next week sounds great actually. No complaints here!  8-)  Can&#39;t sleep, clown will eat me 05:18, 30 May 2006 (UTC)

My user page
Hey CSCWEM, thanks for reverting vandalism on my user page :D Happy editing, Tangot a ngo 07:07, 30 May 2006 (UTC)

Rhode Island Network for Education
Hey, just a heads up from another admin: please don't block school IPs for more than, say, 3 hours. Thanks! &mdash; Deckill e r 11:18, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
 * There does not appear to be any consensus regarding this. Your school (or school district) has been constantly vandalizing Wikipedia for several months now, and something should be really done about it.  Please also note that after you unblocked this address, vandalism immediately picked up just a couple hours later. Have you tried contacting the sysadmin at R.I. for assistance with this problem?  Can&#39;t sleep, clown will eat me 15:32, 31 May 2006 (UTC)

Thanks
Early thanks on the RFA vote. Say, what's this?

John Cena protection
Hi there! (I think) your last edit summary on this article said you were going to semi-protect it, which greatly needs to be done and I have been trying to get it to happen for a long time. (See discussion on that article's talk page) However, I don't see the semi-protect notice at the top of the article? Just curious whats up, it really does need to be protected - the article is a hotbed for vandalism and cruft additions. Thanks, --Naha|(talk) 23:17, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Yes it is, we'll try semi-protection for a few days and see what the results are. Can&#39;t sleep, clown will eat me 23:20, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Thanks :) --Naha|(talk) 23:24, 31 May 2006 (UTC)

Turn that frown upside down
"Nice photoshop trick, just realized it today. 8-) Can't sleep, clown will eat me 23:16, 31 May 2006 (UTC) Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:MatthewH"

Haha, so you've noticed, was wondering when someone would, you may alslo want to look at that plate with the brownies on, i've done a few edits to that, lol i do sad things when i'm bored :P

If you want i can revert the pictures back to normal.

oh btw, i used Paint Shop Pro 7, not photoshop :D

Have a nice day, and don't worry only 12% clowns actually enjoy eating people,   the rest find it abit of a chore.

Matthew 23:33, 31 May 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for reverting my user page...
See above...thanks.

Regards, -- Alphachimp  talk  07:25, 1 June 2006 (UTC)

Edit war on Bob Orton Jr.
Can you please try and sort this out i have tried to tell User talk:DaffyDuck619 to add a citation that isn't from imdb because there has been many untrue things on that website on the ortons pages and to cite and interview or article which he will not do. I have a very strong knowledge of the ortons and contact with one of them so i know the information this user keeps adding isn't true. Also this user has a history of adding untrue things to the ortons pages as he keep adding that barry o's son wanted to be a wrestler (just like his now adding bob's other son wants to be) when that was untrue as barry doesnt have a son but the user still kept adding it for a little abit a while back. Please could you try to talk to him as his also insulted me in an edit summary which is not the first time he has done that to someone his also made false threats in edit summaries before saying he will block someone if they remove his information which he does not have the ability to do. Thank you for any help. Lil crazy thing 08:36, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
 * It appears that he has already been warned regarding the personal attacks. Since I'm not really an expert on pro-wrestling, I've brought this up at WikiProject Professional wrestling for resolution, with hopes that this doesn't need to be escalated any further. Can&#39;t sleep, clown will eat me 19:48, 2 June 2006 (UTC)

Personal attacks
Could you please send a warning or block User talk:DaffyDuck619 he has been warnign about personal attacks in edit summaries yet for the 3rd time he has carried on. His put in the edit summary on the randy orton page by putting this (Citation www.Icancontributetoosojustpissofflilcrazything.com) i've had enough of this person, this is the second time he has done it to me and the 3rd time overall and he has been warn on each one which he has ignore. to update with the bob orton problem he is still not takign any notice of anything. Lil crazy thing 06:39, 3 June 2006 (UTC)

Clowns
Are you actually afraid of clowns? I'm just curious. :-p --Lord Deskana Dark Lord of the Sith 09:24, 2 June 2006 (UTC)

Have you dealt with MostWanted05 or the 86.xxxx user?
I have no choice I had to use the Wikipedia:Requests for comment/user:MostWanted05. His actions and his behavior has gone too far. This user refuses to cite sources and reverts articles just because he doesn't like them. The actions located below:


 * 
 * 
 * 
 * 
 * 

Any thoughts? Thanks. LILVOKA. 2 June 2006 04:33 (UTC)

A haiku of thanks

 * Thanks for your support
 * In my RfA, which passed!
 * Wise I'll try to be.

Your assumed big green plus sign image means a lot - thanks again!

-- Nataly a 05:07, 3 June 2006 (UTC)

Nickname
LOL @ your nickname. :) Ъыь 19:40, 3 June 2006 (UTC)

Joel Leyden
Is there a particular reason why you did not unprotect? Kotepho 20:23, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Sorry about that, it has been corrected. Can&#39;t sleep, clown will eat me 22:19, 5 June 2006 (UTC)

Green energy deletion review
Template:user green energy- deletion endorsed, narrowly 17:33, 5 June 2006 (UTC) review Talk

I see how it was called narrowly, Idea I Think it was 14 delete 12 keep. with only a 2 person difference. It is Just that the 56 people who are using the Template (inclusion) were never alerted that it was going to be deleted so the Template never had a notice and so one day the template just disappeared from the page so few would notice. I happened to use it on a sub page so my less directly Wikipedia related userboxes are out of the way. As soon as i realized the template was deleted it took me a while to find this page because there was not deletion review. After i finally found this page I made an offer to Subset the Template. I received no response (But somebody fixed my comment a little bit). I Think in this situation it would be appropriate to reopen the

Of course I understand that only noticing people who are likely to Vote one way, but when only 12 people decide something that effects 56 others I think No Consensus is Appropriate. Not deletion endorsed. Nobody Objected to me going around subset ting all of them but nobody gave me the go-ahead ether. If I Do subset them it would be more difficult to find all the users. But it would still be possible.

I would like To reopen the Debate and notify a few of the effected parties. At least enough to swing the Vote or require an Article For deletion Vote.

I can understand a small body of people deciding things for a template one or 2 people use but because of the Popularity of this template it should not have been speedy deleted and the view rejected all with most the affected users unaware.

It's just many Templates for deletion end in keep or Subset and this never got that chance. I'm not saying i want Wikipidia to be a Blog or a host sight. I'm just saying we should revote. These Templates are really valuable for finding articles I am interested in. If I see a user box i I like i read the article. However i agree we should not cloud our user page. For that reason i have these templates on a sub user page.--E-Bod 23:01, 5 June 2006 (UTC)


 * Its just that many Wikipidia Editors who want to keep these templates spend their time editing articles and not Patrolling all these Voting Pages To Prevent these things from being Deleted.--E-Bod 23:05, 5 June 2006 (UTC)


 * As far as I understand it, and I may be wrong, Deletion review outcomes are based upon simply majority rather than an interpreted consensus. I have no objection to this template being recreated or relisted for a secondary review by others if I am mistaken.  Can&#39;t sleep, clown will eat me 23:06, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
 * See Deletion_review which states If there is a simple majority to endorse a decision, then no further action is taken — the decision stands. regarding this decision. Can&#39;t sleep, clown will eat me 23:09, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Thanks. That's why I Asked first.  You did Everything Right.  It's just A little upsetting to know that it is possible (But I'm not saying it happened) for one admin to Delete something on a whim and then a simple majority on a random page to Confirm instead of taking the Moral rout that tries more consensus.  Darn Loopholes.--E-Bod 01:20, 6 June 2006 (UTC)

I now make tbe count 15/14 supporting the deletion (a similar margin in the opposite direction to the last time I counted. The list (including any username manglings) is:


 * Undelete: Undelete: Elroch ~ Ssbohio ~ 70.213.250.24 ~ Grue ~ TheJC ~ Bastun ~ GRBerry ~ Hong Qi Gong ~ David618 ~ Ashley Y ~ StuffOfInterest ~ Ombudsman ~ Whispering ~ E-Bod


 * Delete: MarkGallagher ~ Stephen B Streater ~ Sean Black ~ Sam Blanning ~ Tony Sidaway ~ Improv ~ Cyde↔Weys ~ Mask ~ GTBacchus ~ Metamagician3000 ~ Rx StrangeLove ~ Timothy Usher ~ Doc ~ Phil ~ Lar

As E-bod has provided an excellent solution to the issue using a subst, everyone should be happy. Elroch 00:17, 7 June 2006 (UTC)


 * Wonderful, I am glad everyone was able to come to find an agreeable solution for this issue. Can&#39;t sleep, clown will eat me 00:22, 7 June 2006 (UTC)

Delete Vanity Page
Articles_for_deletion/Staylefish &mdash; Staylefish, come on!

Please unblock me
I am autoblocked because "my address 152.163.101.14 is used by vandal Cackletta76". Can't sleep, clown will circumcise me - this should be your user name when innocents like me get caught in a block. LOL. --Hokeman 04:25, 6 June 2006 (UTC)

Helpzorz!
I see you revently reverted an edit to an article I'm having a problem with Bishop Druitt College. As you can see in the article's history...it's a mess. See the talk page here where he actually calls me a "penis". Yay. --mboverload @ 08:37, 6 June 2006 (UTC)

Susan Fennell
I've added two external links that include the information in the article and removed the unreferenced tag. I know that it would be better to actually footnote reference the claims in the article, which I will eventually do, but I feel the links are enough for now to be able to remove the tag. When I have time I'd like to not only reference the claims (none of which are controversial), but also add a lot more to the article. I'm planning on waiting until after the municipal election at the end of the year, though, to be sure she's re-elected.

P.S. Congrats on your sysopping, BTW--I was sure I voted in your RfA, but I can't find it, so I guess not. <b style="color:black;">Oz</b> Lawyer  18:04, 6 June 2006 (UTC)


 * Thank you. With time the references can be converted to footnote style, but the current links are sufficient IMHO to remove the tag.  Can&#39;t sleep, clown will eat me 23:09, 6 June 2006 (UTC)

My RFA
, thank you for participating in my RfA. It passed with an amazingly unopposed 77/0/1. Thanks for the support everybody! If you see me doing anything wrong, want to ask me something, or just want to yell in my general direction, leave me a note on my talk page. I promise to try and knock out Wikipedia's problems wherever I may find them!

Staxringold talkcontribs 20:49, 6 June 2006 (UTC)

Can we get this page protected
I'm talking about the untitled Batman Begins sequel as this user keeps posting B.S about Michael Keaton, Robin Williams and Mark Hamill being considered for the role of The Joker in the movie. He puts up articles on other sites (which have surprisingly come up today when I warned him about his vandalising and being blocked for it) to try and cover his vandalising tracks. Now I'm not saying let's block him, I'm saying lets protect the page Batman Begins -- oh and as for Bob Orton, Jr. -- I'm sorry my answer is no, because lil crazy thing keeps deleting anything I put up in those pages. She's harrasing me by excluding me from editing the pages with truthful facts that she likes to edit! So my answer is no — Preceding unsigned comment added by DaffyDuck619 (talk • contribs) 08:17, 7 June 2006 (UTC)

Block request
71.98.22.81 (talk • contribs • [/wiki/Special:Log/move?user= page moves ] • block user • [/wiki/Special:Log/block?page= block log ]) is repeatedly vandalising userpages. No response at the AIV. Please do the needful. Thanks. Srik e it ( talk ¦  ✉  )  08:21, 7 June 2006 (UTC)

Protect Bishop Druitt College
A person has used 3 different logons and 5 different IPs to vandalize the page, and make numerous personal attack on me. Bishop Druitt College and the even more shocking talk and the shameful history.

--mboverload @ 09:28, 7 June 2006 (UTC)


 * Its times like these that I wish I had CheckUser abilities. AmiDaniel has taken care of the protection for now.  Can&#39;t sleep, clown will eat me 09:32, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Wow, didn't think you would be on. I hear there's only 2 active people that actually do checkusers. --mboverload @  09:36, 7 June 2006 (UTC)

Request
Please delete page Furyspawn, user keeps removing speedy tag. The page is an attack on another user. Thanks.--<font style="background:white">Andeh 18:05, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Thanks. Don't let those clowns eat you! :-) --<font style="background:white">Andeh 18:07, 7 June 2006 (UTC)

Inappropriate username?
I notice that you reverted an edit by Fuk U. Isn't that username in violation of the username policy? PrometheusX303 02:28, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Yes, of course -- the account has been blocked as such. 8-)  Can&#39;t sleep, clown will eat me 02:29, 8 June 2006 (UTC)

dKos
There are WP:BLP issues that need to be sorted out - it might be better if the information is left out of the article until they are resolved. Thanks. Guettarda 03:12, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
 * That's fine, what sort of living person issues are you referring to? Can&#39;t sleep, clown will eat me 03:15, 8 June 2006 (UTC)

Report on Secure sign-in for AOL users
Per your request, an update on the use of the secure signin. I got permission from the technical people at work to use the link, and they streamlined my access down to one extra screen and two keystrokes. I have used the secure signin a number of times, and it has been helpful with the apparent increasing rates of autoblocks. But, I assume you are aware that the secure signin is also regularly blocked by autoblocks and must be released by an admin. So, three times in the last ten days, I have had both "signin" systems blocked at the same time, as the IP numbers rotate. So, overall, I don't think it is a real fix of the problem. Thanks for your interest. WBardwin 05:54, 8 June 2006 (UTC)

computer_tom page!!!!!!!!!!!
why did you lock the computer_tom page!?!?!?!?!?!?!? I told my friend i was planing to write a page on wiki so he went and wrote a dumb stupid message and now the page is locked?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?

Your opinion is requested
Since you're a frequent target of such attacks, please see Offensive username proposal. Cheers! bd2412 T 02:35, 12 June 2006 (UTC)

Just to let you know
Not sure what to make of this, but someone uploaded this picture.



Stu  ’Bout ye!  17:45, 12 June 2006 (UTC)

Can't sleep, clown will revert me ;-)
<div style="float:center;border-style:solid;border-color:blue;background-color:AliceBlue;border-width:1px;text-align:left;padding:8px;" class="plainlinks">

Misza 13 T C has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Smile to others by adding {{subst:smile}}, {{subst:smile2}} or {{subst:smile3}} to their talk page with a friendly message. Happy editing! 19:54, 12 June 2006 (UTC)

You blocked this user only temporarily yet he showed a consistent history of no positive edits and the edits he did make were all violent and hostile. Shouldn't this user be indefinately blocked? --Strothra 20:20, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Generally speaking, no, we do not block IP addresses for an indefinite period of time unless it is shown to be an open proxy, due to collateral damage concerns. If this address is dynamically assigned, the odds are that someone else (an innocent party) will be utilizing it in the next few days or weeks after the vandal releases the IP.  Can&#39;t sleep, clown will eat me 20:25, 12 June 2006 (UTC)

Re: my userpage
Thanks for the revert, you're the best, CSCWEM :) --Kuzaar-T-C- 20:51, 12 June 2006 (UTC)

Michelangelo
Hi, Wetman!

The long addition to the Michelangelo re The Artist - Appraisal.

It should probably be elsewhere.

I did'nt realise when I wrote it that there was already a page for the Sistine Chapel and another one for the ceiling- not exactly the same topic.

Problem is- what I've written (Hey, that the title of John Scott's book and an Art movie) relates to all three. I can-


 * Chop it into bits and insert it
 * move it to its own page.

Problem with chopping it up is that the Ceiling and the Last Judgement form an artistic and theological unit, regardless of the fact that they were done years apart, and ought not be separated. Also that section of the article links the characteristics and philosophy/theology of all three works. The only way to separate them would involve a lot more writing to put the comments on each in perspective.

I'm inclined to start another page. But In another way, I'm loathe to have yet another Michelangelo page.

Maybe I should just do it!

--Amandajm 23:16, 12 June 2006 (UTC)


 * Thank you for your interest, but did you mean to leave this message for User:Wetman? Can&#39;t sleep, clown will eat me 02:08, 13 June 2006 (UTC)

Canberra Grammar School vandals
I noticed this morning that my school IP has been blocked indefinitely from editing Wikipedia, and took a look at the previous edits students here had been making. In the course of checking it out, I came across Abuse_reports/203.129.33.225, and noticed that the last comment on the page was that you were still attempting to make contact with the school administration.

Is the investigation still ongoing, and have you been able to contact them? I ask because, if you never received a reply, I would be happy to contact either the Headmaster or Ms Agnew in person, since both of their offices are a stone's throw from my locker. Just thought I should offer to help, if you need it. :) RandyWang (raves/rants) 08:36, 14 June 2006 (UTC)

User:142.22.186.13
Hey CSCWEM. I just wanted to let you know that I blocked this guy at the same time you did...you blocked him for 36 weeks, and I blocked him for one hour (perhaps the largest difference in history?). :o) Anyway, we should probably let the short block stay, since it's an IP that is shared by multiple users, including Tawker. Let me know what you think. E WS23 (Leave me a message!) 20:37, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Tawker and I need to have a tawk. ;-)  Can&#39;t sleep, clown will eat me 20:38, 14 June 2006 (UTC)

Possible sockpuppetry
Hi cscwem,

If the behavior of a user exactly matches the behavior of a banned user, would that be a good enough reason to block them? &mdash; Khoikhoi 05:51, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Well, that all depends on what that type of behavior is. ;-) If behavior is not particularly offensive, then an inquiry should be posted to WP:RFCU just to be on the safe side.  Can&#39;t sleep, clown will eat me 05:52, 15 June 2006 (UTC)


 * Hey, an admin suggest me to tell you to make the CheckIP. No prove you will have. So, stop this harrasment Khokhoi. --Brasoveanul 05:53, 15 June 2006 (UTC)


 * This behavior is particularly offensive. :p I already checked with Jayjg, and he said it would be ok to block him here. You'll notice that all socks of Bonaparte seem to have some deep hatred of Mikkalai, make fake edits as to raise their edit count, and are just generally obnoxious. &mdash; Khoikhoi 05:56, 15 June 2006 (UTC)


 * Sounds good to me then. 8-)  Can&#39;t sleep, clown will eat me 05:59, 15 June 2006 (UTC)


 * So...where should I report him? :D &mdash; Khoikhoi 06:00, 15 June 2006 (UTC)


 * Either WP:ANI, WP:RFCU, or both, as a formality I suppose. Can&#39;t sleep, clown will eat me 06:02, 15 June 2006 (UTC)

NSider thanks
Thanks for protecting the Nintendo NSider Forums Article (and hours of my work) from those Vandals. I really appreciate it. :D -- — Preceding unsigned comment added by ShadowJester07 (talk • contribs) 06:12, 15 June 2006 (UTC)


 * Not a problem, it seems that, whoever they were, had coordinated an attack on both that and the Sony article. If you see a similar pattern with other pages please drop me a note or email me.  Can&#39;t sleep, clown will eat me 06:21, 15 June 2006 (UTC)

Gremlins
Hi Can't sleep, I noticed you commented on the Gremlins FAC, but the article has been promoted. Did you mean to or would you like to comment on Gremlins 2? CanadianCaesar Cæsar is turn’d to hear 08:15, 15 June 2006 (UTC)


 * Thanks :D CanadianCaesar Cæsar is turn’d to hear 08:20, 15 June 2006 (UTC)


 * Oops, ah yes, 'tis been corrected. Are there not afd top/afd bottom-like templates for WP:FAC discussion pages once discussion has concluded?  Can&#39;t sleep, clown will eat me 08:22, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
 * You should see Featured article candidates/Btrieve. A support a full year after the article was promoted (I think that was my fault though, as I had just stumbled across it and added it to BJAODN, and someone must have thought it was still open). CanadianCaesar Cæsar is turn’d to hear 08:51, 15 June 2006 (UTC)

Good Work
You just rv'd a vandal on the Boy George article. Thanks for your contribution :) I was doing the same thing at the same time (by hand), and my rv got swamped by about 12 others (minor exageration) including yours. did you use a bot or do you just type real fast? Either way, great job and thanks again! Doc Tropics 08:27, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Just real fast. You should see me play Guitar Hero.  Can&#39;t sleep, clown will eat me 08:28, 15 June 2006 (UTC)


 * heh heh, you must be fast :) BTW, I'm a newbie here on WP and that was my very first attempt to rv vandalism. I made a couple of very minor edits in other articles but mostly I'm still learning my way around. Please feel free to keep an eye on me and let me know if I'm doing something wrong or not following a convention properly. I know that I really need to improve my skills and I always welcome input. Happy Editing :) Doc Tropics 08:43, 15 June 2006 (UTC)


 * In that case, you may want to visit Counter-Vandalism Unit, as they list a good number of resources to help alleviate some of the day-to-day problems we face with vandalism. Can&#39;t sleep, clown will eat me 08:47, 15 June 2006 (UTC)

Mark de Vries
It would be helpful if you mention on the talk page what you think needs referencing. Thanks --  SLUMGUM    yap    stalk   11:56, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
 * The entire article is unsourced and in need of references. Can&#39;t sleep, clown will eat me 11:57, 15 June 2006 (UTC)

User talk:Manjos
Is claiming you blocked him but nothing in the block log. What's he talking about? CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 11:58, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Not sure, it could be an autoblock or an underlying IP block. I'll leave him a message on his talk page and try emailing him as well.  Can&#39;t sleep, clown will eat me 12:00, 15 June 2006 (UTC)


 * Never mind, I know exactly who this is, and they are trolling. Can&#39;t sleep, clown will eat me 12:01, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Ah well. If you every get tired of vandal fighting and want to make a whole bunch of new friends come and play here. It's quiet now but sometimes get up to 80+ articles. Plus people will come to your talk page and help to fill it up and send you email (sometimes they even send you a new password) because they really like you. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 12:12, 15 June 2006 (UTC)


 * Funny you should mention that, because I just forwarded another life threatening email to the NTL abuse department 12 minutes ago. Well, I think I need some help remembering my password again, so off I go to visit Category:Candidates for speedy deletion!   Can&#39;t sleep, clown will eat me 12:17, 15 June 2006 (UTC)

Vandalism patrol
Thanks for blocking 65.138.68.52 (talk &bull; contribs &bull; [/wiki/Special:Log/move?user= page moves ] &bull; block user &bull; [/wiki/Special:Log/block?page=User: block log ]). :-) Netscott 22:24, 15 June 2006 (UTC)

adminship
sry i havent been long...but i've been making no-user edits and whatnot. i guess i'll try again later to be an admin Aaron teh tennisman 00:52, 16 June 2006 (UTC)

CampusNet
Hi. I left a message yesterday requesting that this IP be unblocked. It was, thank you. However today I found again that it is banned. I did some research and discovered that my friend (the monk) is on an ISP called "Watchdog" that blocks unsafe internet materials. It turns out that "CampusNet" uses this ISP, meaning schools everywhere in New Zealand, which would explain why there were various vandalism's happening from the IP he is on today. I imagine the ISP have routered many connections through a single IP. Is there anyway that the IP can be blocked, but he is able to use his login and overcome this? His login is "Vidyapati dasa". Please let me know and thanks again Dwayne Kirkwood 03:58, 16 June 2006 (UTC)

He rang the ISP, "alright, so they said that they have a cache IP, which is the one that got blocked, but also they have individual IP assigned to their users, but for some reason Wikipedia has only blocked the cache one...or something like that..."

Apparently they are using a non-transparent cache, which means that all HTTP traffic will appear to come from the same IP, while each individual user has his own IP for non-HTTP data.

"They are going to get in touch with wikipedia and can't sleep, clown will eat me to see about getting it sorted out."

Is there anything that can be done? Thanks again Dwayne Kirkwood 04:44, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Depending on how CampusNet has their network configured, they might be a good candidate for our XFF project. Could you please ask your friend Vidyapati dasa to email me?  Can&#39;t sleep, clown will eat me 06:19, 16 June 2006 (UTC)

Possible vandalism?
I noted an RC to List of Communists by Anon IP 200.178.22.27 and briefly reviewed the Talkpage and edit history. While the article is largely inactive it looked to me like the Anon was systematically deleting valid entries and the Talkpage comment would seem to confirm this. OTOH, I may be misinterpreting what I saw; perhaps the entries are being moved to a different article? If you get a chance to look into it I would like to know what you think. If this is vandalism, the Anon is being fairly subtle about it (note the time lapse between edits). PS - I did follow your earlier link to Counter-Vandalism Unit, but as you can probably tell I'm not skilled enough to help out yet...so I'll just make more work for you instead :) Thanks in advance!   Doc Tropics 06:13, 16 June 2006 (UTC)  PS - I'll watch here for your reply. Doc Tropics 06:15, 16 June 2006 (UTC)


 * Those edits (to List of communists) were many months ago, but I don't see any reason to suspect vandalism at this time; the edits from that IP are sparse and few between, the last one being almost a week ago. Can&#39;t sleep, clown will eat me 06:17, 16 June 2006 (UTC)


 * Right-o. I wasn't sure and I'm glad I asked. Thanks for your time :) Doc Tropics 06:57, 16 June 2006 (UTC)

Template:AOLdos
I'm not sure if this was intentional, but you reverted the addition of a link to media wiki's autoblock checker tool, and I realize it doesn't work 100% the way it should on multi-character names, but it can be corrected manually, and does seem to be a useful addition--172.146.254.221 12:24, 16 June 2006 (UTC)

List of Super Smash Bros. series NPCs
THANK YOU for semiprotecting it. The vandalism was getting out of control - on a funny note, both AntiVandalBot and I reverted at the same time in one instance. AVB was actually verting the latest vandalism while I was reverting vandalism that had just been done just two minutes ago. LOL. Anyway, thanks, you saved me from a trip to request page protection. Hbdragon88 13:25, 16 June 2006 (UTC)

AFD
Please review Articles for deletion/List of relationships with age disparity and take a side. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) (talk • contribs) 15:53, 16 June 2006 (UTC)

question
how do you start a wikiproject?Typoqueen 16:54, 17 June 2006 (UTC)

FYI
I've just lifted a 99-hour block that you placed on User:203.213.7.131. It's a shared IP, and the block was interfering with a good-faith editor. If more vandalism occurs from this IP, I have no problem if it gets reblocked. FreplySpang 23:44, 18 June 2006 (UTC)

DRv edit summary
Sorry to kibitz, put could you link the article that you closing in the edit summary, please? It's a busy page and that makes it easier for me to track one discussion. Thanks. - brenneman  color="000000" title="Admin actions">{L} 07:13, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
 * diff
 * Sorry, can you please rephrase your question. ;-)  Can&#39;t sleep, clown will eat me 07:15, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Am I being obtuse to the point of obfuscation again? I need a warning light or something.  What I meant was had I been following the  Template:Major_programming_languages discussion, only to return and find it done, I'd have to do a bit of hunting to find it.  Sure, I could look at the timestamp on "recently concluded" and work it out from the history.  But that's only if I notice it go.  If instead you linked the name in the edit sumary "closed Template:Major_programming_languages - kept deleted" then I get the information I want from my recent changes.  Also, if and when a question arises about a particular discussion or decision, it's also much easier to chase down the diffs.  Was that better? -  brenneman  color="000000" title="Admin actions">{L} 07:25, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Sure, that was much more helpful. Merci beaucoup. Can&#39;t sleep, clown will eat me 07:28, 19 June 2006 (UTC)

Original research
should I go through wikipedia and erase anythign that isn't cited with a source? I was correcting false information, which now remains untrue do to your reversion.

I will be happy however to help with the rest of the article and erase anythign that isn't sourced if that is the rule. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.182.140.115 (talk • contribs) 08:03, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Please review our policy, No original research, which should answer this question better than I could attempt to. Can&#39;t sleep, clown will eat me 08:06, 19 June 2006 (UTC)

Anon vandalism at Pikmin
A long time ago, (March 11) you posted a vandal warning notice on the talk page on an anon user, 207.6.59.235, for vandalizing the page Pikmin. I warned the user myself after another incident of vandalism at the same article again on May 28, and here we are on June 19 with edits such as this. I'm not quite sure what course of action to take. Thank you for your time, RyanG e rbil10 (Drop on in!) 15:39, 19 June 2006 (UTC)

AHHH! Hungry clowns!! --<font color="#000000">Pilot| guy  22:49, 19 June 2006 (UTC)

Love song vandalism
Can I request you block User:4.43.46.13 for yet another vandalism to the article Love song? He has continually vandalised articles & I noticed your name on his talk page. If you are not an admin, would you be able to point me in the direction of one or tell them yourself? I'll give him a warning but I do not think it is getting through to him & I would like him blocked sufficently. Thanks, Spawn Man 02:03, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
 * The vandal seems to have run off now, so there isn't much point in blocking at the moment. If you notice a reappearance please feel free to drop me a note here and notify WP:AIV as well.  Can&#39;t sleep, clown will eat me 06:25, 20 June 2006 (UTC)

BTW, I love your user name. However, I think you could get a scarier looking clown than the one on your user page. Maybe on ewith fangs or evil eyes... Hmmm, evil eyes, scary... Spawn Man 08:03, 20 June 2006 (UTC)

Stevie Nicks revert
Recently had an edit to article Stevie Nicks reverted. I added a notable incident about one of Stevie's late '80s tours during the height of her cocaine addiction. A search of Google reveals quite a few mentions of this incident with the first hit containing an interview in which the interviewee confirms the cocaine rumor. Would this incident, which is a major pop culture reference, appear better in a "trivia" section or something similar? Thanks, 68.13.236.96 06:19, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
 * If you are referring to this edit I suggest that you provide a very reliable source before resubmitting it, or better yet, bring it up on the respective talk page first. Can&#39;t sleep, clown will eat me 06:21, 20 June 2006 (UTC)

block of 213.232.79.238
Hi. Thanks for blocking the IP 213.232.79.238 but 31 hours? The IP is responsible for vandalizing 15 articles in 30 minutes after coming back from repeated blocks! Pascal.Tesson 12:48, 20 June 2006 (UTC)

consider block of 195.188.173.98
You reverted this IP's vandalism of Nile before I got on WP this a.m. (Calif. time) but if you look at this IP's talk page and block history, it's likely to be the same person over and over again rather than a gang of vandals. Please, let's have an end of this IP. Carlossuarez46 17:26, 20 June 2006 (UTC)


 * By the way, I have reverted 2 other vandalisms by 195.188.173.98, i.e., Fairtrade labelling and Image:Promo greenday pic.jpg. Carlossuarez46 17:33, 20 June 2006 (UTC)

Banning of 212.219.230.135
Hi, the referenced IP address is our local councils proxy which all schools in the area use for access to the Internet. We would actually be grateful if you can somehow ensure that this IP stays blocked as we know some of our students like to vandalism Wikipedia. Regards Dan 09:13, 21 June 2006 (UTC)

Wannabe user?
Maybe this person likes your name? - . Just a thought.-- Andeh 22:14, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Yeah. If you only knew how many Can't _____, _____ will ____ me accounts were created a day.  Can&#39;t sleep, clown will eat me 22:17, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Your a wiki celeb?-- Andeh 09:44, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Well, they do say that imitation is the best form of flattery, but this isn't what I had in mind. Can&#39;t sleep, clown will eat me 09:53, 23 June 2006 (UTC)

block requested for 217.206.188.170
Apparently a London school adress but countless vandalism since the latest of 4 blocks since march. Pascal.Tesson 04:25, 23 June 2006 (UTC)

217.33.74.20 block
I know 217.33.74.20 is frustrating, but please don't place lengthy blocks on this shared IP. violet/riga (t) 11:05, 23 June 2006 (UTC)

Libellous vandalism from 217.33.74.20
Your school network has been an ongoing source of vandalism which could be legally actionable due to its often libellous and defamatory remarks. Have you considered having your network administrator investigate the root cause of this problem? Can&#39;t sleep, clown will eat me 11:08, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Impossible, sadly, as it's not a school thing - the IP is used by the Worcestershire County Council and thus most schools and libraries go through it. violet/riga (t) 14:29, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
 * If it is brought to their attention, they should be able to deal with this rather swiftly, as they can determine which school or library is responsible, and trace it down to the originating terminal. If this were just simple vandalism I wouldn't mind it so much, but a good majority of it is vicious and rather mean spirited.  Can&#39;t sleep, clown will eat me 20:12, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
 * I keep track of any that do it at my school, and it is dealt with there. However, we are talking about dozens and dozens of schools and libraries and I know that it isn't just one that is causing the problems.  The devs need to have a ban option that disallows anon editing from an IP and the creation of new accounts from that IP but allows existing users to edit.  violet/riga (t) 20:23, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Your network administrator should be able to locate the source(s) of every edit by comparing outgoing proxy traffic with the time stamps of the Wikipedia diffs. It would be nice if WP:BPP or a similar solution were in effect, but at the same time these other schools and libraries have a right to know how their network is being used in the event they are ever held accountable.  Can&#39;t sleep, clown will eat me 20:27, 23 June 2006 (UTC)


 * They really aren't that good at monitoring traffic, and are generally unwilling to do so. There are lots of schools & libraries that know that this is happening but are unwilling/unable to do anything about it other than blocking Wikipedia entirely.  The point is though that no shared IP should be blocked for any long duration.  violet/riga (t) 20:56, 23 June 2006 (UTC)


 * The counterpoint is that this network is being used repeatedly to post harassing remarks, and in many cases it resumes immediately after block expiration or block removal, and that perhaps we need to be a bit more proactive since there is a good likelihood that this problem can be curbed if brought to the attention of the right group of people. Can&#39;t sleep, clown will eat me 21:16, 23 June 2006 (UTC)


 * The right group of people is the developers - they need to provide a solution, and WP:BPP would be a good step forward. A one hour block will stop most vandals - students will have moved to the next lesson and people in a library will have given up.  violet/riga (t) 21:22, 23 June 2006 (UTC)


 * Well I suppose we will have to agree to disagree then, seeing that WP:BPP was initiated in October 2005, and to the best of my knowledge there has been no progress on the development side, other avenues can and should be explored, don't you agree? Are you opposed to requesting the network group to investigate this?  Can&#39;t sleep, clown will eat me 21:37, 23 June 2006 (UTC)


 * Hence why I said it would be a step forward, but nothing is happening on that front. I'm not going to try and get county to do anything because I've had too much experience of them previously - it's really not something that would concern them enough to spend a minute of their time on.  Frustrating I know, but that's the way they are.  violet/riga (t) 22:13, 23 June 2006 (UTC)

Gang Starr
When you semi-protected Gang Starr, you forgot to tag the article with. I took care of it. Just so you know when you go to unprotect it.

Oh, and this page could use an archive :-P --GraemeL (talk) 00:03, 24 June 2006 (UTC)


 * Thanks GraemeL, I promise to archive this beast on Monday. Can&#39;t sleep, clown will eat me 00:03, 24 June 2006 (UTC)