User talk:Can't sleep, clown will eat me/Archive 3

Advice?
I am writing because I have seen some of your edits in the past on articles I've edited and your admin actions as well, so I thought you might be able to give me some advice on how to proceed on something.

I won't try to argue the merits of my case, or even mention which article it concerns. I am just looking for advice on what steps to take.

I have had a longstanding dispute with a community on a historical article. This is an article whose editors are largely made up of the ethnic origin that the page covers. (This is clear from their user pages and edit histories, it's not just intuition.) This results, in my opinion, in a general leaning toward portraying the subject other than with a neutral point of view. One piece of information is frequently pushed which is quite misleading and is positioned in a very prominent place, leading casual viewers to get a misleading perception of the subject. (I don't want to get more specific.) The page has been locked on several occasions for edit warring (of which I readily admit I am guilty.)  I more recently tried to get the mediation cabal to look at it, in the hopes that they would and their opinion might create a status quo, but the cabal said no, as they feel it's unlikely that their opinion would be binding.

I asked a fairly well known and highly placed editor what to do, and in his opinion I should just let it go, as there are mutiple users out to push this particular point of view in this article, and on the other side there is me. He said that it doesn't matter if the consensus is groupthink or in fact represents a "closed system," if you will, rather than a consensus arrived at by people with diverse views. I don't want to drag him into this, so I thought I'd ask another experienced admin.

Is this in fact true? I see this as being a "2 + 2 = 5" situation -- something about which consensus should not really matter, as wrong is wrong. Do you agree? And if so, where do I take it from here? Any advice appreciated. Thanks in advance. Larry Dunn (talk) 20:38, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

Unprotect Raymond Chang
Hi there

It's been protected for almost a year. Perhaps it's time to unprotect? --Rifleman 82 (talk) 06:12, 7 June 2008 (UTC)

6 month block
Hi. Could you please explain why you felt that this IP address should be blocked for 6 months? On the face of it there seems to only be a handful of edits from the address over the past couple of years and only a few of them are disruptive, but I am sure there is probably more to it than I can see from the contributions. Cheers TigerShark (talk) 07:18, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Same question with this IP. You blocked them at the same time, were they related? TigerShark (talk) 08:19, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
 * See section "Recent blocks" above. This is a long standing problem with CSCWEM. - auburn pilot  talk  13:40, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks. I would still like to hear his reasoning, as there could possibly be facts that we don't know, suspected sockpuppetry for example. Cheers TigerShark (talk) 17:21, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Please see this post to ANI. You input would be appreciated. Cheers TigerShark (talk) 20:25, 10 June 2008 (UTC)

Signpost updated for June 2, 2008.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 07:32, 8 June 2008 (UTC)

Regarding your blocks
Obviously, we are all volunteers and any service to Wikipedia is appreciated. However, use of the administrative tools requires a willingness to explain your actions, particularly controversial ones. I have randomly flipped through your blocks and found several very questionable ones since your last edit on March 31. I would ask, as have others above, that you be willing to discuss your administrative actions. BP states, "Administrators should also notify users when blocking them by leaving a message on their user talk page unless they have a good reason not to. It is often easier to explain the reason for a block at the time than it is to explain a block well after the fact." Accordingly, if you continue to issue blocks without notifying the user on their talk page or explaining your actions here to users who ask, I will block your account. --B (talk) 02:36, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Also FYI you have been brought up in an AN/I discussion about this. I suggest you respond to it to avoid any future drama. VegaDark (talk) 07:34, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Has anyone considered the possibility that perhaps he went to sleep, the clown ate him, and it is in fact the clown that is now doing the blocking? xenocidic (talk) 19:29, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
 * I think we wait now, just dont make any more unreasonable blocks, or consensus seems to be to open an ArcCom case to maybe get you desysopped, just a friendly warning ...... Dendodge  .. Talk Help 21:22, 11 June 2008 (UTC)

LOL
J00 are funneh guy, HUH!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!>?!?!?!?!?

~Ya Boi Krakerz~ (talk)

Metal bands need protection
After viewing the long articles that the rock bands Tool, Black Sabbath, AC/DC and Guns N' Roses I feel that all of them need to be semi-protected, so that only established users can edit them.

Ya Boi  Krakerz ''

Signshare
Are you a Ja Rule fan like me, if so, you need to check out Max B's music, he sounds just like Ja.

Signpost updated for June 9, 2008.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 06:25, 15 June 2008 (UTC)

Stephen King
Thanks for protectign this one: lots of vandalism lately. What's going on? Bearian (talk) 19:26, 23 June 2008 (UTC)

Rove McManus
Hi. You semi-protected this page in August last year. Are you planning to unprotect it? Was there a consensus to keep it permanently protected? - Richard Cavell (talk) 11:37, 5 July 2008 (UTC)


 * He hasn't edited in awhile, best to ask someone else to unprotect it. Avruch 15:36, 5 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Looks like it was already unprotected this morning. – xeno cidic ( talk ) 15:38, 5 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Actually I unprotected it because I saw this thread. Clown hasn't been around for a while (checked his contribs), so I went ahead. --Rifleman 82 (talk) 20:11, 5 July 2008 (UTC)

Blocking users
Hi there. Please notify the blockee using the uw-block templates. For anonblocks, please add anonblock to the talk page. This is for common courtesy, but also let's the blockee know that they cannot edit, which is especially important for anonblocks. For your reference, your actions are currently being discussed at the administrator's noticeboard. Thanks, PeterSymonds (talk)  11:46, 18 July 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia Weekly
Hello there! New: Episode 58: Wikimania 2008, Jimbo and Reflections. Have a listen. Also, if you haven't heard, all of the other Wikimania episodes are up and accessible through the homepage at http://wikipediaweekly.org. Peace. WODU P bot  09:09, 28 July 2008 (UTC)

You're receiving this because you're listed on WikiProject WikipediaWeekly/delivery. If you'd like to stop receiving these messages, please remove yourself from that list.

Reminder about T-Pain
You are receiving this message because you are listed as the protecting admin for T-Pain. The page has been semiprotected for longer than 2 months without an expiry date set. Because Wikipedia relies on contributers to make the encyclopedia, I'm asking you to review your decision and either I hope that you will do one of the two in order to reduce the backlog of pages that have been semiprotected for very long period of time. Thank you. -Royalguard11 (T) 19:26, 6 August 2008 (UTC) Why am I receiving this message?
 * Unprotect the page if protection is no longer needed, or
 * set a reasonable expiry date for the protection instead of leaving it on forever
 * I know you have a lot of outstanding indefinite semiprotections too dating back over a year, so I won't give you more than the one. It'd be nice if you can go back and check if any can be unprotected though. -Royalguard11 (T) 19:37, 6 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Just FYI, I've requested further input on similar indefinite protections here: WP:Administrators' noticeboard. – xeno  ( talk ) 20:07, 6 August 2008 (UTC)

Request at WP:RfAR for your "without prejudice" desysopping
It is with considerable regret that I would advise you that I have filed a Request per the above matter. I assure you that it was done with utmost concern for both yourself and the encyclopedia/community only, and I hope that you will return to contest the request/removal and to discuss your recent actions. LessHeard vanU (talk) 20:50, 12 June 2008 (UTC)


 * Do you have any response to the request? I'd like to hear your side before getting involved.  BTW, as can me seen on my talk page, I'm dealing with a health crisis, so I might be out of touch for a few days! Bearian (talk) 23:53, 12 June 2008 (UTC)


 * I would advise you the request was declined 0-4-0-0. LessHeard vanU (talk) 12:48, 16 June 2008 (UTC)

Arbitrator comment
Hi,

I'd have emailed this note, but as others have commented, email is disabled.

Obviously this is in furtherance of the concerns others have brought to RFAR. I've taken a look, and note three things - a highly productive history of a good editor and admin on Wikipedia, lack of contact/email, and also (last 2 weeks) lack of blocks issued. My impression is you're on some kind of break, and haven't used that tool a while, in which case, enjoy and have fun!

Can you just make sure that if/as/when you do return to block a problem editor, you'll be able to respond well to any block discussion and unblock requests by others, and maybe also drop a note here in reply to confirm that's all taken care of, or just let people know what the status quo is, and if all's okay. It matters :-)

The other thing is, email per se isn't the important thing, so much as communication. Right now no blocking is going on, so it's not at issue. It's the combination of no activity except blocking, and no email/no posts to any user/no communication, and around 100 blocks, that's a concern. In some of those 100 blocks, surely there was a wish to communicate by some user or admin. If possible, please ensure the communication concerns of other editors (if any) would be addressed quickly, or at any rate, for sure before using admin tools such as blocking again. If you're taking a break, and switched email off to not be disturbed, and won't be using them a while, feel free to let others know, it's fine :)

The only thing is please, only use blocking if there'll be good communication and responsiveness. The tools aren't being touched by stewards (even without communication) simply because there's been no blocking activity for some 2 weeks - all's fine. But the two go together, the tools need communication and responses.

When you get a chance, please let other users know it's fixed and will be okay, before resuming use of these tools. If you don't then the bit will likely be temporarily removed purely until communication's resolved, and - it should be added - without at that point being "under a cloud" at all. But the tools need good care and part of that has got to be responsiveness if they're going to be used.

Apologies for this, and if you need to, or need any help at all whatsoever, please do email me (or [mailto:arbcom-l@lists.wikimedia.org arbcom-l]) without hesitation, and we'll sort it out more fully that way.

If all is in fact okay and it's all good, or you're taking a break and just doing a bit of anti-vandalism housekeeping on the side - hope its a good one, and that this note is not a problem :) But please only engage in blocking, if you'll be contactable and responsive for any discussions that might arise.

Best, and enjoy the break :)

FT2 (Talk 03:22, 13 June 2008 (UTC)

Request for arbitration
With regret, your attention is drawn to the Requests for arbitration page, where a motion has been made regarding your use of the tools. It proposes either that you are directed not to use the tools until concerns are resolved, or the removal of the tools until that time. Your comments, communication, or other input, would be welcomed, as indeed would any action which would render this unnecessary.

Thank you.

FT2 (Talk 17:51, 18 July 2008 (UTC)


 * The Arbitration Committee has passed a motion under which your administrative privilages have been removed pending resolution of various issues described in the case, and below. Steward has enacted the decision, as noted here.  Further comment may be found at WP:AN.


 * This measure is intended to prevent problems whereby users may be blocked and unable to discuss their blocks, and also problems where the block may be questionable and other administrators' concerns cannot be resolved. It was taken because communication via other routes has been unsuccessful and the concerns persist, and it is intended that once the situation is discussed and concerns are resolved, the tools may be restored. The full wording is:


 * "Can't sleep, clown will eat me's administrator privileges are suspended, pending his communicating with the Arbitration Committee, at Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration or by e-mail. This action is intended to be temporary pending resolution of the concerns that have been raised."


 * FT2 (Talk 02:00, 19 July 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Shavit 2
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Shavit 2, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Zack Holly Venturi (talk) 23:34, 20 August 2008 (UTC)

AN/I discussion regarding one of your page protections
Hello,. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. --Kralizec! (talk) 13:25, 8 September 2008 (UTC)

User:Snarklesnappleblast
You blocked him as a vandal back in February. Now, he says he'd like a second chance. Do you have an opinion? -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 16:16, 7 October 2008 (UTC)

Can't sleep, clown will eat me was inducted into The Hall of The Greats
To the legendary insomniac. --David Shankbone  03:21, 3 January 2009 (UTC)

Page Deletion : Phil Barker
I would like to request that you reconsider the deletion of the page Phil Barker.

Under the guidelines for Biographies, the requirement is :

"The person has made a widely recognized contribution that is part of the enduring historical record in his or her specific field"

A quick check on Wikipedia itself:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wargames_Research_Group

Demonstrates that the individual concerned has made notable contributions in his field of historical research and Games Development. I am happy to provide further references beyond those contained in that article if required.

Regards

Doug Me (talk) 04:33, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: I provided the user the deleted content on their talk page. – xeno  ( talk ) 15:13, 2 March 2009 (UTC)

Jojo doesn't have any #1 singles in U.S.
I just want to inform you that Jojo doesn't have any #1 hits in U.S. so you can correct the article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dpstviva (talk • contribs) 15:50, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

Thought of you
I saw this and thought of you. +Angr 05:56, 22 May 2009 (UTC)

206.176.120.83
I have unblocked at the request of Eric Christensen Business Manager, Armour School District who requested the unblock on unblock-en-l. I will monitor this ip as I do all accounts I unblock or create. Fred Talk 02:55, 30 May 2009 (UTC)

Unprotected User talk:Yalbik
I have unprotected this user talk page, which you permanently protected for "trolling" in August of 2007, because I needed to communicate with the user about a copyright problem. Ordinarily, I would check and see if this was okay with you first, but you don't seem to have been here for quite some time. :) Perhaps whatever trolling triggered this protection has passed, since the contributor himself was unblocked that same month to be given a second chance. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 21:53, 16 August 2009 (UTC)

Dude
The fridge is totally empty.  Enigma msg  05:36, 1 November 2009 (UTC)

Krayzie Bone‎
Remember this?
 * 00:47, 6 July 2007 Can't sleep, clown will eat me protected Krayzie Bone ‎ (libel concerns [edit=autoconfirmed:move=sysop]

It's been a couple of years so maybe the problem has gone away. I've initiated a review to see if it's still necessary to semiprotect this article. Please see the talk page. --TS 03:27, 5 September 2009 (UTC)


 * Ditto AFI (band). See the discussion on Talk:AFI (band). --TS 15:49, 5 September 2009 (UTC)


 * Ditto Ray Stevens. See the discussion on Talk:Ray Stevens. --TS 15:54, 5 September 2009 (UTC)


 * This guy hasn't edited for well over one year now, he probably left. I don't see a real point in leaving messages. -- GunMetal Angel  16:52, 18 September 2009 (UTC)


 * Maybe he just... FELL ASLEEP. - Yamara ✉  03:01, 6 October 2009 (UTC)


 * No the clown got him, hacked his Wikipedia account and started making questionable blocks for the fun of it. What else?--Sooo Kawaii!!! ^__^ (talk) 13:32, 8 December 2009 (UTC)

Is this guy ever coming back?
Is he? --Sooo Kawaii!!! ^__^ (talk) 19:31, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Very unlikely.  Enigma msg  19:38, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Looks like he went off the rails.--Sooo Kawaii!!! ^__^ (talk) 10:32, 28 November 2009 (UTC)

RfD nomination of Anry
I have nominated for discussion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. — The Man in Question (in question)  20:31, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Don't bother leaving messeges for this guy, he's long gone.--Misortie (talk) 09:48, 24 December 2009 (UTC)

213.216.199.52
I have unblocked. A scan shows no open ports at this time. Fred Talk 13:53, 19 December 2009 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs
Hello Can&#39;t sleep, clown will eat me! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 2 of the articles that you created  are  Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. Please note that all biographies of living persons must be sourced. If you were to add reliable, secondary sources to these articles, it would greatly help us with the current  article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the unreferencedBLP tag. Here is the list:

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 16:38, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) Paperboy (rapper) -
 * 2) Jake Johannsen -

Martin Crilly
Hi. Patrolling pages and when adding project information to the above page was flagged as previously deleted by you. It's all yours now... :-) (P.S. Apologies for having recreated it before contacting you - message caught my eye just as I was pressing the button.) --Haruth (talk) 08:44, 30 March 2010 (UTC)

Singh Kaur article
Hi! I was about to start an article about Singh Kaur, the musician who passed away 12 years ago after doing nearly 20 albums of music. I was advised to contact you since you had deleted a previous article. Please advise.

http://www.sequoiarecords.com/bio-singh-kaur.html http://www.invinciblemusic.com/singh-kaur

Guru Fatha Singh Khalsa (talk) 14:19, 3 August 2010 (UTC)


 * If this person meets the criteria at WP:MUSICBIO, please feel free to create a well-sourced article that demonstrates notability. The material that was deleted was not written in an encyclopedic tone and a brief glance indicated the sources were not reliable. – xeno talk 14:24, 3 August 2010 (UTC)

Thanks. You are right. I checked the deleted article. New better-sourced article coming up. Guru Fatha Singh Khalsa (talk) 18:53, 8 August 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of 2030 FIFA World Cup


The article 2030 FIFA World Cup has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Total invention

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Kevin McE (talk) 11:12, 4 January 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of 2030 FIFA World Cup


Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as 2030 FIFA World Cup, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Kevin McE (talk) 11:13, 4 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Visitors note that the above notice is misleading CSCWEM was only technically the creator in an admin action securing the page against unwanted creation. This was ages before it was possible to do that in the Mediawiki software. The real page creator would be seen here. Agathoclea (talk) 11:46, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Notification was automaticlally sent here by TWINKLE. I would not wish to accuse CSCWEM of the total invention that was on the page at the time of the prod. Kevin McE (talk) 18:59, 13 January 2011 (UTC)

Haha
Would you believe that almost 5 years ago, I used to be a vandal? Oh yeah lol. I even remember it now. Sitting in computer science class, bored off my duffer. Thought you might enjoy a little humor today. :D Undead Warrior (talk) 22:33, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

User:Can't sleep, clown will eat me/User/Vandalbox
I have deleted this page, as well as the associated User:Can't sleep, clown will eat me/vandalbox header & User:Can't sleep, clown will eat me/vandalbox header, based on the discussion at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:15lsoucy/Vandalize here! and past precedents that such spaces are not generally supported by the community and contrary to What Wikipedia is not. Thanks, &mdash; Scientizzle 16:13, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

Editing Barnstar

 * Well done! --GentlemanGhost (talk) 16:20, 2 July 2011 (UTC)

Ray Stevens
I know that your intervention on this article was ancient, but I thought that you might have a comment on the article's current state. In the UK, our knowledge of Stevens stops around the time of "Don't look, Ethel! But it was too late.  She'd already got a free shot.  Grandstandin', right there in front of the home team."  However, despite the transatlantic cultural differences, the present day article seems a bit more opinionated than "Boogity, Boogity". If you have the time and inclination. Thanks,

Derek R Bullamore (talk) 00:46, 1 March 2011 (UTC)

File:Penny Arcade comic-20051216h.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Penny Arcade comic-20051216h.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Damiens .rf 19:41, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

Merge discussion for Winterbourne, Gloucestershire
An article that you have been involved in editing, Winterbourne, Gloucestershire, has been proposed for a merge with another article. If you are interested in the merge discussion, please participate by going, and adding your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. Skinsmoke (talk) 10:43, 1 June 2011 (UTC)

Non-free rationale for File:Major Havoc title screen.png
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Major Havoc title screen.png. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:37, 12 August 2011 (UTC)

Service award!
Well, you haven't edited in over 3.5 years. It's kind of sad to see a userpage gathering nothing but bits of fallout from actions long past, like leaves on the lawn of house, now long vacant, where happy children once played.

Oh well, you are still accumulating Wikipedia service time (even death cannot stop that), so here's your current award (actually, it won't become accurate until next month, but we'll let that go in your case). Hope you are well and happy! Herostratus (talk) 18:31, 27 September 2011 (UTC)

Damn you clowns!
It is not fair that an editor with one of the funniest names on the whole enWiki hasn't edited in so long. Hmmmm, I just thought of something.... what if he accidentally took a little nap or something, and a clown actually *did* eat him? Moogwrench (talk) 08:36, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
 * That thought depresses me :(. -- Luk  talk 09:28, 3 October 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of The Case of the Franks for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Case of the Franks is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/The O.C. episodes from season 4, volume 1 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. --Gh87 (talk) 16:32, 5 October 2011 (UTC)

A kitten for you!
I passed you on the most-edits list. There's something seriously wrong with me, no doubt. Thanks for all you've done here, and perhaps you'll be back again. All the best!

Drmies (talk) 20:20, 20 April 2012 (UTC) 

Nomination of Jeph Howard for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jeph Howard is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Jeph Howard until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Yunshui 雲&zwj;水 12:00, 11 June 2012 (UTC)

Non-free rationale for File:The Daily Mirror - Sorry We Were Hoaxed.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:The Daily Mirror - Sorry We Were Hoaxed.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:04, 26 June 2012 (UTC)

Non-free rationale for File:Chymos Lakkalikööri.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Chymos Lakkalikööri.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly hi! 06:00, 5 March 2013 (UTC)

Non-free rationale for File:GU vanilla energy gel.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:GU vanilla energy gel.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly hi! 22:44, 23 March 2013 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Don Miguel beef taquitos.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Don Miguel beef taquitos.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Kelly hi! 22:46, 23 March 2013 (UTC)

Non-free rationale for File:Liqueur aux plantes D Absinthe.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Liqueur aux plantes D Absinthe.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly hi! 22:47, 23 March 2013 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Pere Kermanns Absinthe.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Pere Kermanns Absinthe.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Kelly hi! 22:48, 23 March 2013 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Sausage party.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Sausage party.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Kelly hi! 22:49, 23 March 2013 (UTC)

Request to take part in a survey
I am Piotr Konieczny, a fellow Wikipedian (User:Piotrus) and a researcher of Wikipedia (http://scholar.google.com/citations?user=gdV8_AEAAAAJ). I am currently (in collaboration with WMF) embarking on a project trying to understand why the most active Wikipedia contributors (such as yourself) may reduce their activity, or retire. We have a growing understanding of why an average editor may do so (see http://strategy.wikimedia.org/wiki/Former_Contributors_Survey_Results), but we have a very limited understanding of why the top editors would limit their contributions. Yet it is the top editors like yourself who contribute most of Wikiepdia's content, thus understanding this is of vital concern to Wikipedia's project future.

I am contacting you because you are among the top Wikipediana by number of edits, yet your editing activity shows a decline. I would very much appreciate if you would take a minute and answer the following four short questions. Please note this is not a mass email; I am contacting only few dozen of editors like yourself, and each response is extremely valuable. Your response will not be made public, and your privacy will be fully respected.

If you would like to help out in this project and take part in a very short survey, please send me a wikiemail, so that I can send you an email with the survey questions. --<sub style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 19:51, 19 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Hi, I wonder if you had time to consider my request? --<sub style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 11:24, 25 July 2013 (UTC)

File:Cant sleep eating clown cupcakes.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Cant sleep eating clown cupcakes.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Kelly hi! 23:36, 26 November 2013 (UTC)

TfD discussion regarding shorthand flag templates
I'm notifying contributors to USA that it is being considered for merge in a discussion about similar shortcut templates for subdivisions of countries at Templates for discussion/Log/2015 February 12. Any comments are welcome! —PC-XT+ 20:49, 13 February 2015 (UTC)

Can't sleep clown pic
Yes, I know you've been gone forever. I hesitate to put this photo up, because, perhaps, you really can't sleep because of clowns. OTOH when I saw this freely licensed pic, I could only think of your user name. If you don't like clown pics, please delete this without looking at it. File:Tonopah, Nevada Clown collection.jpg

Smallbones( smalltalk ) 20:24, 22 November 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Joe Soares


The article Joe Soares has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing General notability guideline and the more detailed Notability (biographies) requirement. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and ping me back. Thank you. This proposed deletion was started by User:Piotrus

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on |the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. <sub style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 06:22, 20 May 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Ben Brandzel


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Ben Brandzel requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. 13:44, 14 November 2016 (UTC)

Category:German supercentenarians has been nominated for discussion
Category:German supercentenarians, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Legacypac (talk) 06:26, 7 December 2018 (UTC)

Category:Spanish supercentenarians has been nominated for discussion
Category:Spanish supercentenarians, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Legacypac (talk) 09:56, 7 December 2018 (UTC)

Clown-feeding ( 2 things )
1. A live vandal on Wikipedia that is not blocked. Yay! Canninbal clown abuse! 2. So, Pennywise and this cannibal clown are eating another clown. Another Wiki User the 2nd (talk) 13:44, 14 July 2020 (UTC)
 * , this user is inactive. <span style="font-family:'Roboto',sans-serif;font-weight:300;text-shadow: 2px 2px 10px black;color:black;">Ed 6767   talk!  10:00, 31 July 2020 (UTC)

"Spypeout" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Spypeout. The discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 February 24 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 23:16, 24 February 2021 (UTC)

Hi
Hey, I was wondering what this said here before you reverted their edit? cookie monster (2020)  755  05:13, 17 April 2021 (UTC)
 * User:CookieMonster755, that is not a thing we can really talk about. Sorry. Drmies (talk) 23:12, 20 June 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:The Daily Mirror - Sorry We Were Hoaxed.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:The Daily Mirror - Sorry We Were Hoaxed.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 04:16, 11 September 2021 (UTC)

Wonder what happened to you
Every so often I wonder whatever happened to you. I hope you're doing alright. -- Rockstone  Send me a message!  01:46, 24 December 2021 (UTC)