User talk:CanRes

WhatamIdoing (talk) 16:48, 27 May 2009 (UTC)

Reply to email
Hi CanRes,

If you click the "Discussion" tab (which is the label for what everyone calls the talk page) at the top of the article about immunotoxins, we (and anyone else that is interested) can talk about your article-specific questions there. Alternatively, you can reply on this page; I've put it on my watchlist, so I'll (eventually) notice if you edit it.

In general, the answer is "no". Nobody "owns" an article at Wikipedia, and consequently no one has to get permission to make changes. I don't think that there are too many sections; I think that there is far too little information in the article right now. I think that each of those sections could be turned into a full screen's worth of information. For example: Ontak (which I added to "See also") has been on the market for years, but we ignore it in the article. BL22, on the other hand, which is only in Phase 2, and which is being superseded by HA22, is featured. The article should discuss Mylotarg (yes, Wikipedia uses generic names throughout, but the brands are easier to type ;-), Zevalin, Verluma, and more.

Your involvement in the field means that you're likely to be an excellent content contributor, but it also has the potential to accidentally abuse a conflict of interest. You'll want to make an effort to make sure that you're not using the article to promote one person's work. There are some guidelines about sourcing issues at WP:MEDRS that might be helpful. Since you're in the field, I suspect that you will find them to be "basic common sense": focus on high-quality reviews and books instead of, say, unreplicated experimental work and newspaper reports. You can also ask questions at WT:PHARM and WT:MED.

Again, welcome to Wikipedia, and do please feel free to ask for any kind of help that you need. WhatamIdoing (talk) 16:48, 27 May 2009 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Ira Pastan Portrait Photograph.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Ira Pastan Portrait Photograph.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 23:21, 16 January 2014 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Ira Pastan November 2012.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Ira Pastan November 2012.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 23:23, 16 January 2014 (UTC)