User talk:CanadaSFwriter

Welcome!
Hello, CanadaSFwriter, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Draft:Lactobacillus Acidophilus MPH734, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type help me on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!  DGG ( talk ) 10:06, 2 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Your first article
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Lactobacillus Acidophilus MPH734


A tag has been placed on Draft:Lactobacillus Acidophilus MPH734, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the.  DGG ( talk ) 10:06, 2 December 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Lactobacillus Acidophilus MPH734


A tag has been placed on Draft:Lactobacillus Acidophilus MPH734, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the.  DGG ( talk ) 22:19, 25 December 2019 (UTC)

Reply
Hi, thanks for message. User pages have a degree of protection, particularly for referencing, but cannot be used to host blatant promotion or copyright violations are for you to write about your activities on Wikipedia, and are not for promotion. I deleted your article because
 * it did not provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that it meets the notability guidelines. Sources that are not acceptable include those linked to the company, press releases, YouTube, IMDB, social media and other sites that can be self-edited, blogs, websites of unknown or non-reliable provenance, and sites that are just reporting what the company claims or interviewing its management. Note that references should be in-line so we can tell what fact each is supporting, and should not be bare urls
 * you gave some supposed references as bare urls at the end of the article, but they were not in-line so we can't tell what fact each is supporting, and, more to the point, they are not all independent third-party sources. Just a quick look shows that you are using Wikipedia, a dead link and the company itself as references.
 * Since your text is a little bit about the condition and a lot of unsourced promo, it's not clear why this product is notable. We have no sales figures, awards or anything other than, basically, "this stuff is wonderful"
 * it was written in a promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic. You have ®  symbols, but it's not out job to protect their trademarks. Examples of unsourced claims presented as fact include: Once in place, it produces the necessary lactase enzyme so that all dairy products can be consumed without repercussions... Consumers appreciate the convenience of not having to remember pills, and not having to try and decide if the food they're having may or may not have lactose in it. They also report reduced concerns about travelling with pills of any description in today's security-conscious society... and similar promo throughout. I particularly liked 79% of Amazon buyers give 5 star-ratings (Oct/2019), and 83%  rate it at 3 out of 5 stars, or higher.  Conversely, 17% observe that they were dissatisfied with their results, rating it 2 stars or lower.  Other Amazon customers rated the product at 3.7 stars for meeting Vegetarian requirements, 3.6 stars for meeting their Health & Wellness requirements, and 4.5 stars for meeting the requirements of a Low-Carb Diet.  The Value for Money rating also scored 4.5 stars. where your source is a sales site and you bold the scores too, contra MoS. Having a whole section telling s we can buy it from the company, complete with spamlinks, is pretty blatant too
 * there shouldn't be any url links in the article, only in the "References" or "External links" sections. That's particularly the case when they are spamlinks to affiliated sites.
 * Parts of the article look as if they were copied from an unknown and possibly copyrighted source. I didn'yt check this, but for completeness note that copyrighted text is not allowed in Wikipedia, as outlined in this policy. That applies even to pages created by you or your organisation, unless they state clearly and explicitly that the text is public domain. We require that text posted here can be used, modified and distributed for any purpose, including commercial, and text is considered to be copyright unless explicitly stated otherwise. There are ways to donate copyrighted text to Wikipedia, as described here; please note that simply asserting on the talk page that you are the owner of the copyright, or you have permission to use the text, isn't sufficient.
 * You have said you have no conflict of interest and I'm prepared to accept that and restore in your sandbox. However, I will remove the obvious promo and spamlinks, please don't put them back or I'll delete again. Jimfbleak - talk to me?  06:58, 11 January 2020 (UTC)


 * These are the changes I made, you still need proper in-line refs for all your text Jimfbleak - talk to me?  07:14, 11 January 2020 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Lactobacillus Acidophilus MPH734
Hello, CanadaSFwriter. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Lactobacillus Acidophilus MPH734, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 04:01, 27 May 2021 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Lactobacillus Acidophilus MPH734


Hello, CanadaSFwriter. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Lactobacillus Acidophilus MPH734".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 02:40, 28 November 2021 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Lactobacillus Acidophilus MPH734


Hello, CanadaSFwriter. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Lactobacillus Acidophilus MPH734".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 06:31, 12 June 2022 (UTC)