User talk:CanadianPolitics2022

LinkedIn, Rosedeer.blog as sources
Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. However, please do not use unreliable sources such as blogs, your own website, websites and publications with a poor reputation for checking the facts or with no editorial oversight, expressing views that are widely acknowledged as extremist, that are promotional in nature, or that rely heavily on rumors and personal opinions, as one of Wikipedia's core policies is that contributions must be verifiable through reliable sources, preferably using inline citations. If you require further assistance, please look at Help:Contents/Editing Wikipedia, or ask at the Teahouse. Thank you. OhNo itsJamie Talk 16:55, 18 October 2022 (UTC)


 * I will find reliable sources for these items and, if I can't, will delete those parts. CanadianPolitics2022 (talk) 18:04, 18 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Find reliable sources first, please. Also be aware of our WP:COI policy. OhNo itsJamie Talk 18:10, 18 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Thank you. I have provided reliable sources now.  Let me know if there are any further issues. CanadianPolitics2022 (talk) 19:32, 18 October 2022 (UTC)

October 2022
Hi CanadianPolitics2022! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of an article several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. Seraphimblade Talk to me 19:56, 18 October 2022 (UTC)