User talk:Canadian Paul/Ancient History

Welcome to the Wikipedia
Welcome, newcomer! Here are some useful tips to ease you into the Wikipedia experience: Also, here are some odds and ends that I find useful from time to time: *Policy Library *Utilities *Cite your sources *Verifiability *Wikiquette *Civility *Conflict resolution *Brilliant prose *Pages needing attention *Peer review *Bad jokes and other deleted nonsense *Village pump *Boilerplate text Feel free to ask me anything the links and talk pages don't answer. You can most easily reach me by posting on my talk page. You can sign your name on any page by typing 4 tildes, likes this: &#x7e;&#x7e;&#x7e;&#x7e;. Best of luck, and have fun! ClockworkSoul 04:20, 27 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * First, take a look at the Wikipedia Tutorial, and perhaps dabble a bit in the test area.
 * When you have some free time, take a look at the Manual of Style and Policies and Guidelines. They can come in very handy!
 * Remember to use a neutral point of view!
 * If you need any help, feel free to post a question at the Help Desk
 * Explore, be bold in editing pages, and, most importantly, have fun!

Great job on the EVO article.
It looks great. Very good article for a diamond-in-the-rough game. Siv0r

ERC article
Heh, thanks Paul. I had a little time that should've been spent at the beach instead, but it happens. Were you at the leadership thing today?

ERC article
Heh, thanks Paul. I had a little time that should've been spent at the beach instead, but it happens. Were you at the leadership thing today? Elefuntboy 02:17, 23 May 2005 (UTC)

Wikimedia Canada
Hi there! I'd like to invite you to explore Wikimedia Canada, and create a list of people interested in forming a local chapter for our nation. A local chapter will help promote and improve the organization, within our great nation. We'd also like to encourage everyone to suggest projects for our national chapter to participate in. Hope to see you there!--DarkEvil 17:11, 20 January 2006 (UTC)

Death List
Perhaps you can start by explaining to me exactly what it is that makes Death List notable? If I am not mistaken it is a web forum with a relatively small amount of traffic, and it has had a negligible impact on culture -- you use the example of a Simpsons episode but each one of those has a viewership over 10 million and is *far* more notable than a lightly trafficked webforum. And yes, Death List is lightly trafficked, the Alexa ratings for it have it in the dumps. There are HUNDREDS of celebrity dead pools just like Death List (or similar variants), and none of them are notable, either. Such forums simply don't belong in Wikipedia as anything more than a mention, if at all. Quatloo 07:39, 8 February 2006 (UTC) You wrote: "Your view on significance is a bit skewed I think. Why should numbers be the be all and end all? Should we do a seperate page for every episode of every show that has more than X amount of viewers? I don't think it's necessary, because Wikipedia is an informational source, not a fanclub for TV shows."
 * You ask why numbers matter. The Death List is a creature only of the web and only of the web, and because of that, its relative significance can be easily measured by comparing its ranking with that of other websites. And it falls well into the range of non-notable websites: if something lives only on the web and few people see it, it is almost by definition not notable. If it had a life outside of the web, you might have a point, but it does not. And you act as if I did not consider keeping the text from the old article. That text added very little value to the understanding of a Dead Pool. The right thing to do here is exactly what I did, give a passing mention to it and move on. Quatloo 11:23, 8 February 2006 (UTC)


 * Not actually true. It's been featured in newspapers, and some of the people on the list know they're on it. Also, it began in a student pub in 1987, not on the web.-h i s  s p a c e   r e s e a r c h 18:28, 20 August 2007 (UTC)

Hello from Gretnagod
Greetings and good luck with your fight to restore the Death List to its once proud position of having a unique entry. Gretnagod 12:52, 8 February 2006 (UTC)

Oldest people
Thank you for correction, it was my error with supercentenarian list. Greetings. Berasategui 19:10, 29 March 2006 (UTC) Regarding the 'oldest people' list: the source used is  Birthday Table Announced by Ministry of Welfare and Labor Sept. 16, 2005 The announcement calculates the age as of Sept. 30 of the current year. 22 1895/10/12 Choho Fukuhara (M, Okinawa, Japan) Choho Fukuhara (M, Okinawa, Japan), now 109 years 11 months 10 days old 27 1895/12/19 Hiromi Minakata (M, Wakayama, Japan) Hiromi Minakata (M, Wakayama, Japan), now 109 years 9 months 3 days old Thus Choho (or Chojo) Fukuhara was born Oct 12, 1895 and was Japan's 22nd-oldest living person, as of Sept 30, 2005. Hiromi Minakata was born Dec 19, 1895 and was Japan's 27th-oldest living person, as of Sept 30, 2005. Regarding the GRG list: This is Wikipedia, I don't think the lists have to be exactly the same. Note, for example, Wikipedia includes articles like Florence Reeves, 111, not (yet) on the GRG list. I think the GRG list uses a slightly higher standard. In the case of Choho/Chojo Fukuhara, we were told that the oldest living Okinawan male was '110' years old in Oct 2005. As there was only one candidate, it must have been Chojo. Yet we never received official word of his turning 110. So, he's not on the GRG list. But I think for practical purposes we shouldn't short-sheet the bed just because we don't have a willing and capable Japan correspondent at the moment. The Japan lists are updated once a year, every September, so unless we have a correspondent report from Japan the cases are 'presumed' to be living until the next year's list, when those who are not on the new list are presumed to have passed away. Sincerely, Robert Young Senior Claims Researcher for the Gerontology Research Group and Gerontology Consultant for Guinness World Records → R Young {yak ł talk } 10:23, 7 June 2006 (UTC)

Cat:Living People
Hi I incorrectly used the same category then ended up on a category page with only two entries...  for your future info the category is "Living people" NOT "Living People" as you had used on the William Nyhan article. Garrie 22:34, 30 May 2006 (UTC)

Oldest Living Actor
The title of oldest living actor refers to the oldest living actor still working. Dante August 15, 2006

Robert Earl Jones
No. Sorry. GusF 20:13, 8 September 2006 (UTC)

recent deaths
Hi, when you wikilink people's names from Deaths in 2006, best to check it's the right person, eh? Norman Kelley is not the tenor but a journalist. Richard Dyer is not the actor/singer but the noted queer theorist. If it's already been delinked in the history, there's probably a reason for that. - W guice 02:08, 12 September 2006 (UTC)

Estelle Getty
NOT dead ... as of this minute. Thank you for correcting that. When she does expire, I would be the one to verify it. MrEguy 04:19, 22 December 2006 (UTC)

your favourite movies
consider watching the Shawkshank Redemption, that should make your top 10 easily Somemoron 17:43, 25 December 2006 (UTC)

Article- Leon Davidson
CanadianPaul-

I am the grandson of Leon Davidson. His obit was published in the newspaper on January 6, 2007 for White Plains, New York. I guess no one really cared to put it up on the internet. The family has been trying to keep it low-key; none of his friends know. We just moved his wife, Doris, to a nursing home close to our house. Any other comments, put them on the discussion page of my grandfather's article, okay? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 71.225.107.2 (talk) 22:22, 24 January 2007 (UTC).

re: Category:Date of birth missing
Good evening. Per the discussion about privacy concerns expressed at Biographies of living persons, date of birth should generally not be added to the biographies of living non-public or semi-public figures. So far, that policy has been interpreted fairly strictly with a pretty high bar being set for the definition of "public figures" who are assumed to have given up their rights to privacy.

By the same token, we should not be adding Category:Date of birth missing to articles unless we have made the case that the person meets the "public figures" threshold. Otherwise, we're just baiting new users into adding content even though the community has already said that we shouldn't include that particular data point. Category:Year of birth missing is okay but the exact date is often not. Thanks for your help. Rossami (talk) 00:01, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Bolbox Battle EVO.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Bolbox Battle EVO.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 00:11, 4 February 2007 (UTC)

Discussion at Talk:List of the Oldest People
There is a discussion about whether the article should be merged with Oldest people. Squirepants101 19:21, 18 March 2007 (UTC)


 * Sorry Canadian Paul. I deleted your Emma Bodie Begay entry in error.  (Deaths in 2007)  The topic of "oldest" is ripe with confusion.  For example, I don't think Ms. Begay had been listed on this page: Living national longevity recordholders Que-Can 20:11, 7 April 2007 (UTC)

Otto Natzler
Hi, I've nominated an article you worked on, Otto Natzler, for consideration to appear on the Main Page as part of Did you know. You can see the "hook" for the article at Template talk:Did you know where you can improve it if you see fit. Regards,  howcheng  {chat} 06:00, 26 April 2007 (UTC)

Don Tuzin
Sorry, I am a former student of Don's and if I have any of his books they are in storage. I've been meaning to read Cassowary's Revenge for a while. Please feel free to add to the bio entry if you can. Mccajor 23:54, 26 April 2007 (UTC)