User talk:Canadianfixerupper

Tesla dispute
Hey there, I invite you to join the discussion here.

Drever
I really don't want to edit war, so I hope you'll come to the article talk page to discuss the info in the thread I've initiated. Connormah (talk) 00:58, 7 May 2015 (UTC)

The information is all fact the image wasn't me, but I am going to add referenced articles about this situation since this is a big swing, she beat a potential cabniet member.

New Democratic Party
Hello, we have asked you repeatedly to take your dispute with the political position of the New Democratic Party to the talk page before making changes to the infobox. Disputes such as this one are common on this page and are best handled by reaching a consensus amongst editors on the talk page. If you persist in changing this on the main page rather than participating in the discussion, you may be barred from editing. EncyclopediaUpdaticus (talk) 14:19, 7 May 2015 (UTC)

Can you please defend your edit at Talk:New Democratic Party. TFD (talk) 15:13, 7 May 2015 (UTC)

June 2015
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Nikola Tesla, you may be blocked from editing. Binksternet (talk) 01:16, 17 June 2015 (UTC)

June 2017
Your recent editing history at Ruth Bader Ginsburg shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Bbb23 (talk) 23:59, 2 June 2017 (UTC)

Political Parties of Supreme Court Justices
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Associate_Justice_of_the_Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States#Political_Party_Affiliations_of_Justices To try and find some common ground, I'd like your two cents. 134.129.203.28 (talk) 02:56, 5 December 2017 (UTC)

→ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:John_Roberts#Political_Party_Affiliations_of_Federal_Justices Moved here 134.129.203.28 (talk) 03:43, 7 December 2017 (UTC)