User talk:Candywalton

Speedy deletion of KAOR
A tag has been placed on KAOR requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ShakingSpirit talk 17:38, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

March 2008
Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself. Please use the template on the page instead if you disagree with the deletion. ShakingSpirit talk 17:44, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

Welcome!
Regarding KAOR, before you create the article you should build it up to the level that it can be considered a WP:STUB, stating why the subject is notable. ShakingSpirit talk 17:50, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to KAOR. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. · AndonicO  Hail!  17:53, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Regarding that - it was reverted because you added personal contact details, which should not be on Wikipedia. ShakingSpirit talk  18:04, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. The next time you create an inappropriate page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Tanthalas39 (talk) 04:03, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:Kaorin2007.JPG
Thanks for uploading Image:Kaorin2007.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 18:24, 15 April 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? MECU ≈ talk 18:24, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

File:Kaorin2007.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Kaorin2007.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Kelly hi! 19:11, 19 November 2013 (UTC)