User talk:Canglesea/2011

Nishikawa
Hey there, I saw you assessed the article Nishikawa Castle, and first, I want to say Thank you! However, I don't think the WP: Japan "B-class" becomes official until all the evaluations are filled in (y/n). I added the template, and if you could take another look at Talk:Nishikawa Castle, I'd surely appreciate it! Boneyard90 (talk) 13:06, 6 January 2011 (UTC)
 * ✅ - Canglesea (talk) 14:12, 6 January 2011 (UTC)

C.W.A. Scott
Hi Canglesea I have asked people for their input at the peer review page about this article with the aim of then submitting it for Good or G A status but know-one has come up with any suggestions, so I am wondering if this just means no-one has had time or whether it means that no-one can think of any ways to improve the article, either way I am thinking that it may be time to put the article up for Good or G A assessment. Would you kindly let me know if you agree and if so the best way to put things in motion, cheers Jimmy3d0 (talk) 13:31, 8 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Okay, I will take a critical look at the article this weekend; then we'll submit it for GA review . . . - Canglesea (talk) 20:51, 8 January 2011 (UTC)

Somerset airfields
Thanks for tagging & assessing RNAS Charlton Horethorne (HMS Heron II) & RAF Weston-super-Mare. I've also been working on some of the other Somerset airfields over the weekend & it would be great if you could take a look at: RNAS Yeovilton (HMS Heron), Bristol (Whitchurch) Airport, Yeovil/Westland Airport, RAF Weston Zoyland, RAF Merryfield (which I think should be merged with RNAS Merryfield), RAF Culmhead and RAF Charmy Down.&mdash; Rod talk 18:12, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
 * ✅, thanks for your work, Cheers - Canglesea (talk) 06:56, 24 January 2011 (UTC)

Charles Lindbergh Article Assessment
Please explain on what basis you have chosen to assess the Charles Lindbergh article which is almost 15,000 words long, has had over 5,000 edits by almost 1,900 users over a period of 8.5 years, includes 39 illustrations, 130 citations (footnotes), 21 external links, a bibliography of 24 books, and which had also been previously nominated as a "Good" article, to being nothing more than a "start class" article which is defined as "An article that is developing, but which is quite incomplete and, most notably, lacks adequate reliable sources." Thank you. Centpacrr (talk) 01:51, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
 * As you have indicated, the article meets 4 of the 5 B-Class criteria. The B1 criteria, referencing and citation, is not met as evidenced by approximately 26 "citation needed" tags. -Canglesea (talk) 02:36, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
 * That hardly seems to make this a "start" class article, however, as it already has 130 other citations and I dare say is longer, far more mature and complete, and much better cited than the vast majority of articles on WP. (The "citation tags", by the way, were added by the same editor who had previously nominated the article as a "good" article.) In most cases the source of the requested citation is made clear by being included in the prose of the article, or it is a continuation of already cited material appearing earlier in the same paragraph (and often the immediately preceding sentence) making most if not all of these recently added "citiation needed" tags (which also only appear in just a few of its later sections) specious at best. Either way this is clearly not a "start class" article. Centpacrr (talk) 03:49, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Well, your other choice is B-Class, which can be assigned by any reviewer. Go ahead and change it, I will not protest. Cheers. -Canglesea (talk) 04:08, 6 February 2011 (UTC)

The Bugle: Volume LVIX, January 2011
To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 15:21, 21 February 2011 (UTC)

4th Airborne Division (United Kingdom) Assessment
Thank you for giving the article an assessment. The results were better than I thought they'd be. However I would like some advice on how I can improve the article to bring it up to B-class status.Graham1973 (talk) 12:42, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
 * The article is referenced and well cited, however, it needs more than one reference to satisfy the referencing criteria (B1). Adding information from additional references should satisfy the coverage criteria (B2). The structure criteria (B3) is marginally met; a lead section summarizing the article is needed. See the 23rd Armoured Brigade (United Kingdom) for an example of an article that meets the B-Class criteria. After you develop the article further, please submit it for a B-Class review: WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Requests Cheers -Canglesea (talk) 23:58, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the advice. Improving the references might be tricky though. The book I have been using is heavily based on primary research. In this subject there is very little easily available information once you get past Operation Fortitude. I'm currently working on an article covering Operation Abeam, the first operation designed to insert a fake unit into the British OOB and I'm not getting much partly due to the fact that the unit in question was the 1st SAS Brigade and so you find all sorts of vague references tied in with the David Stirling Story, but not much hard detail. The account in Holt is the first real detail I've uncovered.Graham1973 (talk) 12:19, 18 March 2011 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LX, February 2011
To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 21:19, 17 March 2011 (UTC) +

Captain Daniel Roberts
Thank you for catching Known for Know. How did you happen to look at the article? Sirswindon (talk) 21:52, 25 March 2011 (UTC)
 * My pleasure. I help out clearing up the Military History backlog list. -Canglesea (talk) 21:58, 25 March 2011 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXI, March 2011
To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 01:22, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

Re: War of the Polish Succession (1587–1588) review
Thanks for B-passing this article. Could you look at Battle of Byczyna, which I wrote at the same time? They share a lot of content. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; talk 02:36, 14 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Done. Thanks for your efforts. -Canglesea (talk) 22:49, 14 May 2011 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXII, April 2011
To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 22:01, 17 May 2011 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXIII, May 2011
To begin or stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 22:13, 4 June 2011 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXIV, June 2011
To receive this newsletter on your talk page, join the project or sign up here. If you are a member who does not want delivery, please go to this page. BrownBot (talk) 22:35, 16 July 2011 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXV, July 2011
To receive this newsletter on your talk page, join the project or sign up here. If you are a member who does not want delivery, please go to this page. BrownBot (talk) 21:39, 14 August 2011 (UTC)

SS Norvarg
Why does this article fail B class criterion B3 "structure"? Mjroots (talk) 18:09, 20 August 2011 (UTC)
 * The history section of SS Norvarg is a bit long (4-5 pages). I suggest some sub-sections, perhaps by date? -Canglesea (talk) 21:31, 20 August 2011 (UTC)
 * ✅ Mjroots (talk) 06:00, 21 August 2011 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXVI, August 2011
To receive this newsletter on your talk page, join the project or sign up here. If you are a member who does not want delivery, please go to this page. EdwardsBot (talk) 17:39, 11 September 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion
Hello,

An article you have helped edit, Confirmation and overclaiming of aerial victories during World War II (which was formerly entitled "Confirmation and overclaiming of aerial victories") has been proposed for deletion.

Georgejdorner (talk) 17:25, 2 October 2011 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXVII, September 2011
To receive this newsletter on your talk page, join the project or sign up here. If you are a member who does not want delivery, please go to this page. EdwardsBot (talk) 01:56, 27 October 2011 (UTC)

MILHIST Military Aviation Questionaire
Hi Canglesea! As your MILHIST Military Avation Task Force coordinator, I'd like to conduct a short questionaire to give me an idea of what you would the task force to achieve and the capabilities of yours that might contribute positively to the task force. The four questions of this questionaire are:
 * 1) What are your strengths on Wikipedia?
 * 2) Which four military aviation articles would you like to see be promoted to at least GA?
 * 3) What detailed resources (books, journals, etc) about military aviation do you have access to? Please provide the publications' authors, titles and ISSNs/ISBNs.
 * 4) Which three military aviation articles are you wiling to provide assistance? This can be expansion, copyediting, reference formatting, etc.

Please reply by copying and pasting the following at User talk:Sp33dyphil and filling it out.
 * 1) My strengths
 * 2) Articles I'd like to see the task force improve
 * 3) Sources which I have
 * 4) Articles I'm willing to provide assistance
 * 1) Sources which I have
 * 2) Articles I'm willing to provide assistance
 * 1) Sources which I have
 * 2) Articles I'm willing to provide assistance
 * 1) Articles I'm willing to provide assistance
 * 1) Articles I'm willing to provide assistance
 * 1) Articles I'm willing to provide assistance

Thank you for your assistance. Regards --Sp33dyphil © • © 09:14, 25 November 2011 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXVIII, October 2011
To receive this newsletter on your talk page, join the project or sign up here. If you are a member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. EdwardsBot (talk) 07:56, 28 November 2011 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXIX, November 2011
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Ian Rose (talk) and Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 20:17, 27 December 2011 (UTC)