User talk:Cannesfan

Jessica Chastain
Hi. Please always provide an edit summary with your changes, unless very clearly reverting vandalism (in which case you should often leave an escalating warning on the corresponding user page). This change is part of a content dispute with an IP editor who left a detailed edit summary with the previous change. By reverting without an edit summary you rather imply vandalism and that is clearly not the case this time.

As far as Chaplin is concerned, the source accompanying that paragraph just says she has a three-legged dog, nothing about her motivations for having it unless I have missed something. Perhaps you could look for a better source which mentions any animal welfare or whatever interests she has? If the material is being challenged for triviality it really needs a better source to justify it. Also, please don't revert too often, remember WP:3RR and take a dispute to the talk page if necessary (I'll mention this to the IP too). --Mirokado (talk) 15:28, 16 May 2012 (UTC)

Thank you for the feedback. Cannesfan (talk) 16:47, 16 May 2012 (UTC)

Your sole edits since last summer have been on Jessica Chastain. That is suspect. Anyways, NY Times is a RS. I am readding the information. Be Blessed! 108.56.237.111 (talk) 23:15, 21 October 2012 (UTC)