User talk:CannonCH/Social constructionism/Mcontris Peer Review

CannonCH,

Overall, the original article looks pretty good. It has a strong opening that made me easily understand social constructionism. Would suggest rearranging some of the article like history and development should be more towards the beginning of the article rather than the end. For applications, there are some applications that have very little information written about them, maybe you could expand on some of those. For your contribution, I see that you plan to add to the crime section. First, there is a spelling error “focussed” should be focused in sentence 1. I also noticed the majority of tour sentences don’t have a source or reference attached. I would make sure to add where you got the information to avoid any plagiarism. Overall, great job! Mcontris (talk) 22:18, 26 February 2021 (UTC)

Hey Mcontris, Thanks for the recommendations. I looked over the article myself and decided I may change up the order of the paragraphs as you mentioned but I think it could work either way. I also went back and fixed my spelling mistakes. Thanks for the heads up! CannonCH (talk) 23:16, 7 March 2021 (UTC)