User talk:Cannywizard

Your submission at Articles for creation: CLIO (satellite) (October 21)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:CLIO (satellite) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User_talk:Cannywizard Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Ahecht&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User_talk:Cannywizard reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Ahecht ( TALK PAGE ) 19:33, 21 October 2014 (UTC)

Draft:CLIO (satellite) concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:CLIO (satellite), a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:31, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:CLIO (satellite)


Hello, Cannywizard. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "CLIO".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the  or  code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by one of two methods (don't do both): 1) follow the instructions at WP:REFUND/G13, or 2) copy this code:, paste it in the edit box at this link , and click "Save page". An administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 04:01, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 17
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited James Jude, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Maple Lake. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 17 August 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 27
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Hazardous Area Response Team, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page NHS. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:11, 27 November 2015 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Exercise Unified Response (May 19)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by 333-blue was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Exercise Unified Response and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Exercise_Unified_Response Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:333-blue&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Exercise_Unified_Response reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

 333-blue  12:14, 19 May 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Exercise Unified Response has been accepted
 Exercise Unified Response, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. . Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! Ringbang (talk) 17:55, 20 June 2016 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Exercise_Unified_Response help desk] .
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Extended confirmed protection policy RfC
You are receiving this notification because you participated in a past RfC related to the use of extended confirmed protection levels. There is currently a discussion ongoing about two specific use cases of extended confirmed protection. You are invited to participate. ~ Rob 13 Talk 15:56, 22 December 2016 (UTC)

ETCS
Hi Cannywizard,

you have deleted a sentence of my creation in the article about European Train Control System. Because I am not a native english speaker, it would be helpful to get it better.

Original: "Unfortunately was a long time no strait release management and so exists no clear numbering scheme and hidden differences in practical installation until BL 3."

This is connected together with mentioned software development methods. People are wondering, what happend between SRS 2.2.2 and SRS 2.3.0 and what means SRS 2.3.0d. In german article it is explained in more details. Possibly this sentence should be moved to chapter for baseline 2, shouldn't it?

Thanks in advance, with regards Saxobav (talk) 15:31, 3 May 2017 (UTC)


 * Hi, even with better English, this statement is primarily opinion-based (what is "strict", what is "clear"?), and doesn't add very much to the article. I suggest that if you really wish for it to be included, we need a reliable third-party source, and perhaps a discussion on the article's talk page. cannywizard (talk) 19:40, 6 May 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:AlphaCollaboration.png
Thanks for uploading File:AlphaCollaboration.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:23, 28 September 2019 (UTC)

"Irish Act 1782" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Irish Act 1782 and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 November 17 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Iveagh Gardens (talk) 09:49, 17 November 2022 (UTC)