User talk:Canon8canon

Welcome
Welcome!

Hello, Canon8canon, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! - Sinneed  03:35, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Manual of Style

I am sorry if your welcome seemed a bit unfriendly below, please don't let the difficulty of editing wp:BLP information put you off! :) We need editors, it is unfortunately sometimes a bit frustrating to get started.-  Sinneed  03:37, 24 June 2010 (UTC)

June 2010 - Natalie Blair
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Natalie Blair. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Everard Proudfoot (talk) 21:30, 22 June 2010 (UTC)

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living persons, as you did to Natalie Blair. Thank you. Everard Proudfoot (talk) 01:16, 23 June 2010 (UTC)

Why I removed the content
Hello, I removed the bulk of the content, not because it was untrue, but because it was unsourced. If this information is published in generally wp:reliable sources, it may merit inclusion, whether true or false. WP cannot assess truth, it can only assess whether or not something has been published, and present the published content neutrally, or with wp:BALANCE. Hope that helps.