User talk:CanonLawJunkie/Archive/2010

Please stop
Plo Koon is not a notable subject, and the content you are adding fails to meet WP:RS and WP:WAF. Please stop restoring it; your content fails to meet WP:BURDEN. Thank you, and happy editing [elsewhere]! --EEMIV (talk) 17:49, 10 June 2010 (UTC)
 * I have now reverted you twice. Plo Koon is not notable enough for his own article. Please do not continue to revert the Plo Koon article, or you may be blocked from editing. --Deskana (talk) 21:16, 10 June 2010 (UTC)

Welcome
Welcome!

Hello, CanonLawJunkie, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! Schuhpuppe (talk) 15:04, 19 June 2010 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Manual of Style

Request
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. When you make a change to an article, please provide an edit summary&#32;for your edits. Doing so helps everyone to understand the intention of your edit. It is also helpful to users reading the edit history of the page. Thank you. &mdash; Martin (MSGJ · talk) 21:21, 21 July 2010 (UTC)

Re: Please join
Hey thanks for the invite to WikiProject Canon Law! It boggles my mind how people track changes on Wikipedia. I am also discerning the priesthood at this time. Paulmnguyen (talk) 01:56, 23 July 2010 (UTC) - Hi from my cell! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.46.106.9 (talk) 22:19, 24 July 2010 (UTC)

Excommunication (Catholic Church)
Hi CLJ.

I have taken the liberty of replacing the contents of the article you created with a redirect to the RC section in the main Excommunication article. I did this as the article you created seemed to be largely, if not entirely a copy its contents. If you intend to expand your new article then please feel free to revert my edit, but I would suggest that if you do this, then you replace Excommunication with a brief summary and include a link to your new article.

Best Regards WhaleyTim (talk) 11:32, 17 August 2010 (UTC)

Template:WikiProject Federated States of Micronesia
Hi there. This template should be at this name, to match the names of most other WikiProject banners which are at Template:WikiProject XXX. Please see WP:STANDARDIZE for more details. However you can still use WP FSM and WikiProject FSM as shortcuts if you wish. Regards &mdash; Martin (MSGJ · talk) 13:42, 19 August 2010 (UTC)

Welcome!
 Hello and welcome to the Military history WikiProject! As you may have guessed, we're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to military history.

A few features that you might find helpful:


 * Our navigation box points to most of the useful pages within the project.
 * The announcement and open task box is updated very frequently. You can [ watchlist it] if you are interested, or you can add it directly to your user page by copying the following: WPMILHIST Announcements.
 * Important discussions take place on the project's main discussion page; it is highly recommended that you [ watchlist it].
 * The project has several departments, which handle article quality assessment, detailed article and content review, writing contests, and article logistics.
 * We have a number of task forces that focus on specific topics, nations, periods, and conflicts.
 * We've developed a set of guidelines that cover article structure and content, template use, categorization, and many other issues of interest.
 * If you're looking for something to work on, there are many articles that need attention, as well as a number of review alerts.
 * If you have an idea for improving the project, we have a strategy think tank that provides a dedicated forum for discussing it.

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask any of the project coordinators or any other experienced member of the project, and we'll be happy to help you. Again, welcome, and we are looking forward to seeing you around! Kirill [talk] [prof] 17:28, 21 August 2010 (UTC)

Template:cn
I believe that you are misusing this template: To quote from its instructions: ''many editors object to what they perceive as overuse of this tag, particularly in what is known as "drive-by" tagging, which is applying the tag without attempting to address the issues at all. Consider whether adding this tag in an article is the best approach before using it, and use it judiciously. Wikipedia's verifiability policy does not require reliable sources for common facts.'' —Preceding unsigned comment added by 148.177.1.210 (talk) 16:51, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Second that. Also examine WP:LEAD. The opening section of an article very rarely needs references as it summarizes the article content. Materialscientist (talk) 22:35, 30 August 2010 (UTC)

invitation
Hi, CanonLawJunkie. Thanks for the invite. I have to decline at this time, but if you need help from time to time, please let me know and I'll see what I can do. God bless you. Go, Phillies! Eagle4000 (talk) 18:21, 3 September 2010 (UTC)

the Public Policy Initiative Assessment Team wants You!
Hi CanonLawJunkie, I saw some of your contributions on an article that falls within the scope of Wikiproject: United States Public Policy, and I was hoping you would be interested in assessing articles with the | Public Policy Initiative. There is more info about assessment on the 9/13/2010 Signpost. If you're interested or just curious you can sign up on the project page or just contact me. Thanks! ARoth (Public Policy Initiative) (talk) 22:00, 14 September 2010 (UTC)


 * CanonLawJunkie, I am glad you were open to joining and welcome to the Public Policy Initiative Assessment Team. I am excited to get started, the discussion of project details will be on the | WP:USPP/Assessment Talk page. ARoth (Public Policy Initiative) (talk) 22:15, 17 September 2010 (UTC)


 * Thanks for joining the PPI Assessment Team. There is a request for you to review some articles and a description of assessment logistics on the WP:USPP Assessment Page. ARoth (Public Policy Initiative) (talk) 16:28, 23 September 2010 (UTC)


 * Hi CanonLawJunkie, thank you for assessing articles in the Wikiproject: United States Public Policy. This project is probably different than other assessment drives you have worked on, it involves more assessment of lower ranked articles, it has input and staff from the foundation, and specific goals to improve and measure content of public policy articles. It also involves collaboration from some university classes, we are using an experimental assessment rubric, and most articles will be assessed by multiple reviewers to get a range of scores for each article. I have learned a lot from many of the  assessors comments and am really excited about the insight from this group of Wikipedians. I hope you are finding some benefits to involvement in this project. 1) your assessments are part of research that is attempting to increase credibility of Wikipedia in academic circles, 2) there is a great group of assessors involved in discussion of what is article quality and how to measure it, 3) WP:USPP is also piloting the Article Feedback tool, so if interested, those involved in assessment on the project will be asked to help improve and rate this tool as well, and 4) subject matter experts are assessing articles alongside Wikipedians and comparisons of results will provide some insight as to the rigor of Wikipedia quality rating.


 * To give you an update on assessment, about half of the assessments are complete for the first part of this first assessment. I had some trouble finding public policy experts to join us in assessing, but finally managed to recruit a group last week, hopefully some of them will join the discussion on the assessment talk page. Next week, I should have some preliminary results to share with you, I will also post the second assessment request very soon. The discussion on the talk page is very exciting, and I hope if you are interested, you will provide input on the Article Feedback Tool which is being piloted on articles in WP:USPP. Please let me know if there is anything I and the project team can do to make working on this project a more positive experience. Thanks again, ARoth (Public Policy Initiative) (talk) 23:33, 4 October 2010 (UTC)

The Milhist election has started!
The Military history WikiProject coordinator election has started. You are cordially invited to help pick fourteen new coordinators from a pool of twenty candidates. This time round, the term has increased from six to twelve months so it is doubly important that you have your say! Please cast your vote here no later than 23:59 (UTC) on Tuesday, 28 September 2010.

With many thanks in advance for your participation from the coordinator team,  Roger Davies  talk 21:24, 16 September 2010 (UTC)

Joining Star Wars music Wikiproject
How do I join the Star Wars music WikiProject? —Anakiniman (talk) 03:10, 21 September 2010 (UTC)


 * Hi fellow Catholic and Star Wars fan! In response to your question, go to WP: WikiProject Star Wars Music, push "edit" and type 4 tilds (~) after the last person. Thanks and God bless!

 Canon Law Junkie §§§ Talk 15:46, 21 September 2010 (UTC)

Signature
You may not have images in your signature, per the signature guideline. / ƒETCH COMMS  /  20:12, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
 * I have changed my signature. Thanks!  Canon Law Junkie §§§ Talk 16:19, 29 September 2010 (UTC)

Template:Humanities
Hi, I imagine this is a reasonable solution to the issue of proper placement of canon law, theology, philosophy, etc.? ... Kenosis (talk) 20:27, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
 * CanonLawJunkie, thank you for your kind response. --Ancheta Wis (talk) 11:35, 27 September 2010 (UTC)

Regarding Canon law and its applicability to clergy abuse cases
Please see TalK:Catholic sex abuse cases, where I believe some input from someone directly knowledgable about canon law would be appreciated. Thank you. John Carter (talk) 16:02, 29 September 2010 (UTC)

CS&T
CS&T is a great source of info from the Archdiocese. Right at the moment, I'm helping with the rewrite on Catholic Church, and a few other articles. What would you like me to help you with?Malke 2010 (talk) 23:11, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
 * I'll put in something about the founding, and history. Hope that helps.Malke 2010 (talk) 13:06, 2 October 2010 (UTC)

Canon Law wikiproject
Thanks for the invitation! I would be happy to join! --Willthacheerleader18 (talk) 01:06, 4 October 2010 (UTC)

Asia project
Is now up and running http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Asia SatuSuro 04:02, 11 October 2010 (UTC)

WP:USPP thanks you! And hopes you come back!
CanonLawJunkie, thanks for contributing to article assessment in WP:USPP. Your continued involvement would be very appreciated. There is a second assessment request posted. There will be weekly updates about the research for this project posted here, look for the first one tomorrow. The next assessment request will come in early November. There is a lot of expertise and discussion about article quality happening in the project, so if you have any thoughts on the metric, or any ideas keeping project research exciting please let me know. ARoth (Public Policy Initiative) (talk) 22:37, 13 October 2010 (UTC)


 * Hi -- Amy Roth is now out on maternity leave (she had a healthy baby girl this weekend!) so I'll be filling in for a couple of months. (I'm LiAnna Davis, the Public Policy Initiative's communications associate.) I'd like to get the second assessment finished this week if possible. Please let me know if you can't finish it by this weekend! Let me know if you have any questions. Thanks again for all your help! --Ldavis (Public Policy) (talk) 22:27, 20 October 2010 (UTC)

Sorry you won't be able to continue assessing with us, but thanks for your interest! All the best, Ldavis (Public Policy) (talk) 16:26, 25 October 2010 (UTC)

WikiProject North America is OFFICIAL!
Hi. Since you indicated an interest at WikiProject Council/Proposals/North America, I am happy to inform you that WikiProject North America has officially been created. As one of the original supporters, you're at the top of the list of people being invited to join. Sven Manguard Talk  08:45, 24 October 2010 (UTC)

Nintendo task force membership update
It's that time again to update membership status with the Nintendo task force, which we periodically do to keep our membership up-to-date.

All participants have been placed on an "Inactive participants" list. To confirm that you're still a member of the Nintendo task force, simply go to WikiProject Video games/Nintendo and move your name from the "Inactive participants" list to the bottom of the "Active participants" list. If you are no longer an active member in the task force, you may simply remove your name altogether. On 23 December, all entries under the "Inactive participants" list will be removed. Hopefully you can stay with us and continue to work on Nintendo-related articles. Regards, MuZemike delivered by MuZebot 17:27, 19 November 2010 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LVI, October 2010
To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 22:06, 21 November 2010 (UTC)

Confederate States of America
I saw you interest in joining a project to further the scope of CSA article. I was thinking of having a task force instead of an entire project as there seems to be a lot of overlapping WikiProjects anyways. I was wondering if you would still be interested in joining this task force?

A few suggestions for parent projects were Military History, American Civil War, and North America. I was leaning towards the latter as the CSA goes beyond simply the war. All advice would be appreciated.(Lihaas (talk) 02:29, 22 November 2010 (UTC)).
 * I would think starting it in one project and then combining with the other (we can then also combine with MilHist if need be)Lihaas (talk) 20:27, 22 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Sorry, ive been busy and will be for the the next week but then ill start up the taskforce and get abck to you.(Lihaas (talk) 19:23, 2 December 2010 (UTC)).

The Bugle: Issue LVII, November 2010
To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 22:05, 8 December 2010 (UTC)

Happy Holidays from PPI
Hi CanonLawJunkie, you previously assessed articles with WikiProject: U.S. Public Policy. Your input is appreciated, and contributed to the research in the | Public Policy Initiative. The project has been pretty exciting; there are over 25 university classes signed up for spring semester. This project is about more than public policy; it is about using Wikipedia as a teaching tool and recruiting (and hopefully retaining) college students as editors. If you are still interested we will be starting more rounds of assessments in the new year. I am the research analyst for the project, feel free to contact me. If you already responded definitively, I apologize for not following up properly, I just had a baby and have been a bit overwhelmed. Happy holidays, ARoth (Public Policy Initiative) (talk) 01:40, 23 December 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Charter of the Rights of the Family


A tag has been placed on Charter of the Rights of the Family requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Burhan Ahmed (talk • contribs) 13:57, 27 December 2010 (UTC)