User talk:CanonLawJunkie/Archive/2020

Help needed in Latin
Hello! I would need your help in Latin for some articles I am trying to turn into Good Articles. 1) Could you translate the following as faithfully as possible: "Novit beatitudo vestra cui se totamque ecclesiam discrimini commiserit Sixtus V. dum juxta propriae doctrinae sensus sacrorum bibliorum emendationem aggressus est; nec satis scio an gravius unquam periculum occurrerit" 2) I tried to summarise the long quotation in Latin in 192-193 by writing: "The first comittee was created by Gregory XIV on 7 February 1591. This commitee was presided by M. A. Colonna[10][11] and comprised of six other cardinals working on the revision; in this committee Bellarmin was, along with 10 other people, an advisor for the revision.[12]" Is it a faithful summary? Is there important details I missed, e.g. the position of the people (editor or advisor)? 3) I tried to summarise the long quotation in Latin in pp. 194-195 by writing: "This commitee was composed of 9 people of which M. A. Colonna, Antonius Agellius, Bellarmine, Petrus Morinus, Frederico Borromeo, Lelio Landi, and A. Rocca." Is it a faithful summary? Is there important details I missed, e.g. the position of the people (editor or advisor)? Thanks in advance! Veverve (talk) 19:53, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Hello again. The article now says: "The fourth commission was created by Gregory XIV on 7 February 1591. It was presided over by M. A. Colonna[8][9] and comprised six other cardinals working on the revision. Ten other people were part of the commission as advisors, including Robert Bellarmine.[7]"; and concerning the second commission: "Two people were members of this commission: M. A. Colonna, its president,[8][12] and William Allen. This commission also comprised eight other people as advisors: Bartholomew Miranda, Andrea Salvener, Antonius Agellius, Robert Bellarmine, Bartholomew Valverde, Lelio Landi, Petrus Morinus, and Angelo Rocca.[12]" Could you check if I got things right? Veverve (talk) 09:46, 28 May 2020 (UTC)

RfC - scope and title for the American Revolutionary War article
I am forwarding this RfC notice to you, along with the ongoing Discussion Summary Chart because you are listed as a History Project member interested in American history. The RfC and discussion is found at Talk:American Revolutionary War. Please feel free to delete this notice if it does not fit your current interests. - TheVirginiaHistorian (talk) 10:21, 6 December 2020 (UTC)

American Revolutionary War, which is within the scope of this WikiProject, has an RFC for value. A discussion is taking place. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. TheVirginiaHistorian (talk) 23:23, 4 December 2020 (UTC)