User talk:CanonNi/Archives/GII

Talk:Irate Gamer
Hello, CanonNi,

I'm not sure why you created this talk page as there is no article here and hasn't been since 2008. So, there is no need for a talk page for a nonexistent article. These just get deleted through speedy deletion because they are unnecessary. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 03:42, 3 April 2024 (UTC)


 * Hi @Liz. I created the talk page as part of an accepted request on WP:AFC/R, but the page itself was blocked from creation from 2008 and only the talk page was successfully changed. CanonNi (talk) 08:53, 3 April 2024 (UTC)

You reverted this
Dearest editor,

I saw you reverted here on Agricultural pollution. Well, I'm was about reverting it as well but remembered the input wasn't bad and doesn't seem like copyvio and maybe the editor may be taking to cite it (or that they don't know got to cite). I was about giving them tips on that before I saw your edits. Please clam down little and know that IP's are humans too. They may not have sources it but reading it makes sense and the article in question looks essay (..I). Just a reminder! Safari Scribe Edits! Talk! 01:03, 4 April 2024 (UTC)


 * Thanks for informing me. I'll be more gentle from now on. CanonNi (talk) 01:05, 4 April 2024 (UTC)

Caution
Hello, CanonNi,

Please be careful when using editing tools like those for disambiguation pages. You created some broken redirects that needed to be fixed. You are responsible for all of your edits so please double-check and don't depend too much on the editing tools. Use your own judgment. Liz Read! Talk! 03:09, 5 April 2024 (UTC)


 * Sorry about that. I'm new to using the tool and have made some mistakes that I'm completely responsible for. I will check all my edits made using such tools from now on, and thank you for fixing my edits. CanonNi (talk) 03:11, 5 April 2024 (UTC)

Articles for creation/Categories
Please, review my requests at Articles for creation/Categories. 202.134.10.142 (talk) 10:47, 5 April 2024 (UTC)


 * Hi, I'm currently busy and will review the requests later. Alternatively, you can try contacting other active editors at AfC/C. Thanks. CanonNi (talk) 10:57, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
 * just visit last 2 requests. 202.134.10.142 (talk) 11:00, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
 * The requests have been reviewed by @Eejit43. CanonNi (talk) 01:54, 6 April 2024 (UTC)

Sockpuppet @Dinkar 108 is back
Hey @CanonNi, I want you to know that sockpuppet master @Dinkar 108 is back with another Sockpuppet @Prominister. Just look at his unconstructive edits with same pattern on same pages Paliwal, Hemu, Kannauj. [Paliwal] [Bahun] [Kannauj] and [Hemu]. He is vandalising these pages with same pattern as @Dinkar 108. Brahaspatya (talk) 12:55, 6 April 2024 (UTC)


 * In short, I don't think the user is a sock. See my comment on the investigation for reasons why.  (talk | contribs) 12:56, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
 * I have seen it sir. You need to check his disruptive edits on Kannauj and Paliwal where he removed authentic sources same like @Dinkar 108 . His account date is also from the same time of Ban on @Dinkar 108. I informed you about this because you are the most active here when it comes to sockpuppets. Please investigate into this. Brahaspatya (talk) 13:01, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
 * I'll look into it and will comment on the investigation later.
 * Also, thanks but I'm definitely not active with sockpuppet investigations. I've only ever participated in a few, and I mainly do maintenance tasks.  (talk | contribs) 13:03, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Thanks for it. I will wait for it. I also request you to make Checkuser request. Brahaspatya (talk) 13:07, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
 * I'm not a CheckUser and probably never will be. See this list for active CheckUsers.  (talk | contribs) 13:09, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Its saying that this page of checkuser list does not exist. I request you to mention some active Checkuser or experienced Sockpuppet investigator here if you don't mind. Thanks. Brahaspatya (talk) 13:13, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
 * My mistake. See this link instead.  (talk | contribs) 13:16, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
 * (talk | contribs) 13:22, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Thanks alot. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Brahaspatya (talk • contribs) 13:48, 6 April 2024 (UTC)

Sock
Hi! CanonNi, check thiw SPI , one of the sock , you are talking on talk page now using other account for vabdalising thr articles. Donald567 (talk) 07:38, 7 April 2024 (UTC)


 * Hi. I really don't mean to sound rude but please leave me alone with the Indian caste edit wars. I don't care who is or isn't a sock, and to be honest, you sound like one too. Thank you.  (talk | contribs) 07:46, 7 April 2024 (UTC)

IP users asking about usernames.
Hi, CanonNi. I notice that you have answered two queries about usernames on the Teahouse from IP users with, essentially "You are an IP user, so you haven't got a username". (That's not your exact wording, but that's the sense I took from it). In both cases, reading between the lines, I think the message is from somebody who has an account, but either they've forgotten it, it's blocked, or they've just forgotten to log in. Your answer is not wrong, but if I'm right (and I might not be) it's not very helpful to them. ColinFine (talk) 17:30, 7 April 2024 (UTC)


 * Sorry about my reply in this question. I misunderstood the question and will pay more attention to the wording in the future. Thanks for reminding me.  (talk | contribs) 23:43, 7 April 2024 (UTC)

Your signature
What is with your recent signature change? It makes it difficult for people to leave you a communication. David notMD (talk) 04:02, 8 April 2024 (UTC)


 * Really? I left the (talk|contribs) in my signature.  (talk | contribs) 04:06, 8 April 2024 (UTC)

My sig ...
...Got old and fighting my phone as well. Four of Sixteen (talk) 09:50, 8 April 2024 (UTC)


 * No problem. Just remember to sign posts with ~ in the future.  (talk | contribs) 09:51, 8 April 2024 (UTC)

Sockupuppet investigation
Hello CanonNi, and thank you for this sock puppet investigation:. This user now has a fourth (?) sock puppet: The user: Frankovsky S may be another sock puppet:. I am a bit unsure how to handle the matter, since I am not that familiar with these things. Perhaps you know better how to add this account to the investigation? My best greetings--Aciram (talk) 18:40, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: the user claims that the three accounts are all three different individuals, who all have the same issues with the article subject. I am not certain how this affects the investigation.--Aciram (talk) 18:56, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
 * It seems that has added Frankovsky S to the investigation.   (talk | contribs) 01:12, 9 April 2024 (UTC)