User talk:Canto2009

Welcome...

Hello, Canto2009, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: Introduction The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Help How to write a great article Manual of Style

Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place  on your talk page and ask your question there.

January 2009
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. ''Please stop redoing changes that have been reverted by consensus. '' Dougie WII (talk) 18:19, 17 January 2009 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. ''Please stop adding redundant information that has been repeatedly reverted by consensus. '' Dougie WII (talk) 21:43, 25 January 2009 (UTC)

Passions
I really can't understand your continued insistence on adding your rambling phrasing regarding Passions move to DirecTV in every article which mentions Passions. The truth of the situation is clearly presented without noting multiple times that The 101 is "exclusively available on DirecTV" (existing phrases like "DirecTV's The 101 Network" already express that) or that "NBC never released them onto it's own network or anywhere else for viewing in the United States" (what part of "NBC cancelled the series" is unclear?). It's beginning to seem like you are making these edits just for the sake of having your contributions included, which is inappropriate but would be acceptable if they were constructive. They're not. Please stop.&mdash; TAnthonyTalk 01:39, 22 February 2009 (UTC)


 * I am trying to find the good faith intentions of your persistent edits to NBC and Passions-related articles, but frankly, I'm stumped. You are simply not understanding that the entire saga of Passions broadcasting need not be explained in every article which mentions the series. In the particular case of the NBC article, the paragraph in question is about daytime programming on the network, which renders irrelevant your extended explanation of what happened with Passions after it was canceled by the network. The paragraph and section are not about NBC Studios, which produces the series. As a compromise, I previously added the DirecTV info as a footnote for those who may be interested, but it is not information that fits into the context of the section. Please stop trying to restore it as such.


 * Perhaps it will help if I explain that though the series was both produced and broadcast by "NBC," the production company and the broadcasting network are two separate entities which, when written about in these types of situations, need to be considered no more interchangeable than FOX vs. ABC.&mdash; TAnthonyTalk 22:50, 15 March 2009 (UTC)

November 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Template:Sociology has been reverted, as it appears to have removed content from the page without explanation. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Ixfd64 (talk) 22:06, 14 November 2009 (UTC)

Vandalism
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing.

You have deleted the content of the social psychology (sociology) article and replaced it with an endless web of redirects. This is grossly inappropriate and could not possibly be done without adequate agreement. Where is the content for this page, please? --Tomsega (talk) 10:18, 15 November 2009 (UTC)

Vandalism
This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing.

Blocked for sock puppetry
You have been. (blocked by MuZemike 21:29, 11 December 2009 (UTC))

You may contest this block by adding the text below, but please read our guide to appealing blocks first.

As confirmed by CheckUser. See Sockpuppet investigations/Canto2009. MuZemike 21:29, 11 December 2009 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry case
Your name has been in mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Sockpuppet investigations/Canto2009 for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. &mdash; TAnthonyTalk 21:38, 28 February 2010 (UTC)

March 2010
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts (please see Sockpuppet investigations/Canto2009). If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest this block by adding the text below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Tiptoety talk 22:09, 2 March 2010 (UTC)