User talk:Canucklehead/Archive 9

This archive contains messages from my talk page between April 9, 2019 and April 12, 2020

The Signpost: 30 April 2019
 * Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:36, 30 April 2019 (UTC)

The Signpost: 31 May 2019
 * Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:10, 31 May 2019 (UTC)

The June 2019 Signpost is out!
 * Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:52, 30 June 2019 (UTC)

The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, Q2 2019
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:10, 15 July 2019 (UTC)

The Signpost: 31 July 2019
 * Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:17, 31 July 2019 (UTC)

The Signpost: 30 August 2019
 * Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:41, 30 August 2019 (UTC)

The Signpost: 30 September 2019
 * Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:06, 30 September 2019 (UTC)

The Signpost: 31 October 2019
 * Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:11, 31 October 2019 (UTC)

The Signpost: 29 November 2019
 * Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:23, 29 November 2019 (UTC)

The Signpost: 27 December 2019
 * Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:37, 27 December 2019 (UTC)

The Signpost: 27 January 2020
 * Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:09, 27 January 2020 (UTC)

The Signpost: 1 March 2020
 * Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:22, 1 March 2020 (UTC)

March 2020
Your recent editing history at Good News Mission shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.''I actually was reverting that edit and realized that the edit has links to blogging sites, not actual news sources. Feel free to suggest changes on the talk page, but I think an edit summary was needed for that edit.'' Aasim 22:00, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Wait... do you suspect that user is banned or blocked? Aasim 22:01, 24 March 2020 (UTC)  Got confused, but thanks for the clarification Aasim 22:07, 24 March 2020 (UTC)


 * This user is removing the same referenced content without a demonstrated attempt to justify why it doesn't belong in the article. This is exempted by WP:3RR.  Cryptic   Canadian  22:04, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
 * This user is also now blocked for these edits.  Cryptic   Canadian  22:04, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
 * I got confused, but thanks. PS some of these warning messages do not appear friendly :\ Aasim 22:07, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Here, have some cookies instead:

Why are you deleting my page but it has links?
Why? SouthAfricanCitizen (talk) 02:57, 26 March 2020 (UTC)


 * Links are not necessarily references. In order to be considered notable, it needs to be verifiable with reliable sources.  Cryptic   Canadian  03:01, 26 March 2020 (UTC)

There are hundreds of links that talk about the page but I chose those ones because their more telling about the page. Should I convert them to REFERENCES? Even If you search the page on Google you'll see what I'm talking about SouthAfricanCitizen (talk) 03:03, 26 March 2020 (UTC)


 * Ideally, the links should be refs, but each piece of information in the article needs to be directly attributable to a particular ref. Self-published sources, like social media profiles, are not reliable sources.


 * By googling him, I'm not seeing any third-party coverage. The only truly objective information I see here is the music award link you've posted, but that doesn't appear to establish notability on its own. See WP:GNG.  Cryptic   Canadian  03:09, 26 March 2020 (UTC)

Nikola Karev is Macedonian
Check the external links that I added at the bottom of the page before you undo the changes. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.4.174.33 (talk) 03:33, 26 March 2020 (UTC)


 * While I was going by precedent, it turns out that Wikipedia has a policy on this and that I'm wrong. I admit fault. Sorry.  Cryptic   Canadian  03:39, 26 March 2020 (UTC)

How can you protect information when you have proof that the info that you are editing it's true?

The Signpost: 29 March 2020
 * Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:42, 29 March 2020 (UTC)

Questions
1. How do I barn the status of admin?🇺🇸✝️RheieWater2005✝️🇺🇸 (talk) 15:10, 8 April 2020 (UTC)

2. How do I Prevent myself from getting block?🇺🇸✝️RheieWater2005✝️🇺🇸 (talk) 15:10, 8 April 2020 (UTC)


 * Responded on user's talk page  Cryptic   Canadian  01:58, 9 April 2020 (UTC)

I responded
I AM NOT LOGAN DO YOU HEAR ME. I. AM. NOT. LOGAN checkuser will prove everything and show how wrong you are. Light Angél00 (talk) 17:57, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Well, you were right. I just had the wrong master. — { Cryptic  Canadian }  21:38, 11 April 2020 (UTC)